You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #65: Did Bush Break the law (IWR) or not? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
65. Did Bush Break the law (IWR) or not?
Bush attacked Saddam, claiming authority under the IWR and UN resolutions passed years prior, so this is easy to clear up once and for all. Why don't the people who were ostensibly duped - Kerry et al - just plead their case that Bush had no authority to invade Iraq and that the war is unauthorized and illegal under the IWR?

Seems easy enough, or am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Clinton on Lieberman ProSense  Aug-15-06 10:14 AM   #0 
  - Man, I miss that guy.  Skinner   Aug-15-06 10:22 AM   #1 
  - I missed Clinton saying this in 2003 and 4 when it could have HELPED,  blm   Aug-15-06 01:14 PM   #15 
  - oh man, Skinner  Skittles   Aug-16-06 12:05 AM   #41 
  - Remember back when we had a real president? Those were good days....  Rowdyboy   Aug-16-06 12:55 AM   #42 
  - The Hug is over! Amen!!  Larkspur   Aug-15-06 10:30 AM   #2 
  - So when will Bill Clinton start campaigning for Ned? n/t  invictus   Aug-15-06 10:32 AM   #3 
  - A reminder of how it was to have an intelligent president.  Hope2006   Aug-15-06 10:35 AM   #4 
  - Errrr...I smell bullshit!  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-15-06 11:30 AM   #5 
  - Can Clinton be more transparent?  karynnj   Aug-15-06 11:49 AM   #6 
  - I don't understand it, either!  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-15-06 12:13 PM   #7 
  - Damn skippy  sandnsea   Aug-15-06 12:18 PM   #8 
  - Well, for now at least, we need Clinton.  KaptBunnyPants   Aug-15-06 12:31 PM   #9 
  - And there you are repeating the lie!  ProSense   Aug-15-06 12:37 PM   #10 
     - I stand corrected.  KaptBunnyPants   Aug-15-06 01:52 PM   #18 
  - Good points. Bill's use of continued sanctions against Iraq was a  Tom Joad   Aug-15-06 12:52 PM   #12 
  - The most gullible people in the world sit in the US Senate. Or?  Tom Joad   Aug-15-06 12:48 PM   #11 
  - That is patent nonsense! This thinking is part of the problem n/t  ProSense   Aug-15-06 01:09 PM   #13 
  - They can explain it away all they want...  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-15-06 01:10 PM   #14 
  - Actually, YOUR thinking was the danger - YOU chose to believe IWR gave  blm   Aug-15-06 01:27 PM   #16 
     - Correction: It wasn't the so-called "Left" who are at fault...  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-15-06 02:06 PM   #19 
     - There has been a lot of political spin in characterizing the vote, much  ProSense   Aug-15-06 02:39 PM   #22 
     - There was also this.  desi   Aug-15-06 02:56 PM   #23 
     - My point is that those on the left who didn't correctly COMPREHEND the IWR  blm   Aug-15-06 03:04 PM   #24 
        - Why are you blaiming the Left???  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-15-06 03:17 PM   #26 
           - Read it without a chip - THOSE ON THE LEFT who misread the IWR is not the  blm   Aug-15-06 03:21 PM   #27 
           - I read and comprehend what you're saying...  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-16-06 01:11 PM   #43 
           - That is exactly the problem:  ProSense   Aug-15-06 03:36 PM   #28 
           - That's a damned good post right there.  Major Hogwash   Aug-15-06 05:14 PM   #32 
           - Don't you understand? Oppose the war, means you are really for it  Tom Joad   Aug-15-06 08:30 PM   #37 
              - No - but not comprehending the IWR accurately led to baseless attacks  blm   Aug-16-06 03:46 PM   #57 
     - It was a stupid, foolish resolution, that the wiser ones opposed.  Tom Joad   Aug-15-06 08:28 PM   #36 
     - No, the wiser ones opposed it from the get go cause  politicasista   Aug-15-06 08:41 PM   #40 
     - AMENNNNN!!!!!!  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-16-06 01:24 PM   #44 
        - "I STILL think it's bullshit!" And this is still nonsense!  ProSense   Aug-16-06 01:30 PM   #45 
           - I didn't agree with Feingold's support of Israel's actions...  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-16-06 01:41 PM   #48 
              - "Feingold also supported Alito." Huh?  ProSense   Aug-16-06 01:45 PM   #49 
                 - Go check his record!!  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-16-06 02:10 PM   #53 
                    - You're telling me to go check his record, but you misspoke? n/t  ProSense   Aug-16-06 04:20 PM   #58 
     - Did Bush Break the law (IWR) or not?  sampsonblk   Aug-16-06 10:42 PM   #65 
  - Clinton still has the magic. Be prepared to see a lot more of him. (eom)  oasis   Aug-15-06 01:27 PM   #17 
  - ''Be prepared to see a lot more of him.'' I certainly hope so...  desi   Aug-15-06 02:21 PM   #20 
  - Not me!  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-15-06 03:14 PM   #25 
     - Plenty of "evidence and intelligence" was juiced up by Bushco  oasis   Aug-15-06 04:05 PM   #29 
        - That's right!  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-16-06 01:30 PM   #46 
           - "Kerry or any other syncophantic DemoCrap"  ProSense   Aug-16-06 01:36 PM   #47 
              - I'm a true blue Democrat! Not a DemoCrap!  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-16-06 01:53 PM   #50 
                 - That's crap. Your posts are all over the place!  ProSense   Aug-16-06 01:59 PM   #51 
                    - I said he WAS!!!  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-16-06 02:08 PM   #52 
                       - Maybe you can stop calling people  ProSense   Aug-16-06 02:10 PM   #54 
                          - If you're not a Kerry apologist, then...  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-16-06 02:16 PM   #55 
                             - Anyone can claim anything, but the facts are there for all to see! n/t  ProSense   Aug-16-06 04:22 PM   #59 
  - delete n/t  politicasista   Aug-15-06 08:40 PM   #39 
  - Interesting...kick  politicasista   Aug-15-06 02:38 PM   #21 
  - With all due respect, Lieberman's position is different  dolstein   Aug-15-06 04:06 PM   #30 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Aug-15-06 08:36 PM   #38 
  - Who cares? He is not a Democrat anymore.  Dr Fate   Aug-16-06 04:36 PM   #61 
  - FWIW  cmkramer   Aug-15-06 04:33 PM   #31 
  - Having endorsed Lieberman in the primary, it's going to be . . .  dolstein   Aug-15-06 06:55 PM   #33 
     - Another good point. n/t  ChipsAhoy   Aug-16-06 10:03 PM   #64 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-15-06 07:35 PM   #34 
  - You do! Look what you chose to do with your life! n/t  ProSense   Aug-15-06 07:43 PM   #35 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-16-06 03:41 PM   #56 
        - "Need I say more?" Yes, what does that have to do with Senator Kerry? n/t  ProSense   Aug-16-06 04:23 PM   #60 
           - ProSense, read my posts...  TrueFunkSoldier   Aug-17-06 09:41 AM   #66 
              - "Only NOW when public opinion has turned against..." Nonsense!  ProSense   Aug-17-06 10:14 AM   #67 
  - Bill Clinton backed Bush invading Iraq, so wtf is he talking about?  Imagevision   Aug-16-06 05:18 PM   #62 
     - Bill Clinton backed Bush invading Iraq  ChipsAhoy   Aug-16-06 10:02 PM   #63 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC