You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: That's what a family is. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. That's what a family is.
Honestly, I don't see why we give corporations an easier time than individuals.

However, many states limit partnership sizes for tax purposes, so there is a logic to limitiing civil unions to two people.

Also, if they're formed around the logic that you need to address the legal relationship between two people who tend to raise children/reproduce themselves, through adoption or procreation, or whatever, there is legal logic to the idea that to make things simple only two people can share the partnership status at one time.

You're free to break off the legal relationship and reform it with any ONE other person you chose. However, how are you going to control the conduct of your life when you're sharing these basic rights and responsibilities, duties and obligations with more than one other adult?

Let's limit it to a union of two people at any one time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Solution to the Gay Marriage Election Issue Nederland  Feb-05-04 06:27 PM   #0 
  - Yea the repugs are in charge of all federal law and they  lastknowngood   Feb-05-04 06:34 PM   #1 
  - I agree that the hypocrisy shouldn't continue  Terwilliger   Feb-05-04 06:37 PM   #2 
  - I don't think the distinction is equal  truhavoc   Feb-05-04 06:48 PM   #3 
  - Question  HFishbine   Feb-05-04 07:18 PM   #6 
  - It sounds reasonable to me, and would also cover  DemBones DemBones   Feb-05-04 07:13 PM   #4 
  - What issue?  tinanator   Feb-05-04 07:16 PM   #5 
  - Civil rights is indeed an issue  tishaLA   Feb-05-04 07:31 PM   #10 
  - play into their hands then  tinanator   Feb-05-04 07:59 PM   #16 
  - Gay Marriage isn't an Issue?  Nederland   Feb-05-04 07:33 PM   #11 
     - If you think this election year distraction  tinanator   Feb-05-04 08:02 PM   #19 
  - a little late in the game for that  arewethereyet   Feb-05-04 07:21 PM   #7 
  - Two people should be able to pair up just like lawyers in a law firm, or  AP   Feb-05-04 07:24 PM   #8 
  - But (a hypothetical)  HFishbine   Feb-05-04 07:35 PM   #12 
  - Why not?  Nederland   Feb-05-04 07:46 PM   #14 
  - Good point. Utah might pass a law that you can have a CU with more than  AP   Feb-05-04 08:01 PM   #18 
  - That's what a family is.  AP   Feb-05-04 08:00 PM   #17 
     - Ha!  HFishbine   Feb-05-04 08:35 PM   #24 
        - It's not like 2 is an arbitrary number.  AP   Feb-05-04 08:43 PM   #25 
  - Well, lots of religions are quite fine with gay marriage  tishaLA   Feb-05-04 07:35 PM   #13 
     - It's harder to change ones government? Chaning gov't is what democracy  AP   Feb-05-04 08:02 PM   #20 
        - Right.  tishaLA   Feb-05-04 08:29 PM   #23 
  - Libertarians would be happy with that!  Carl Spackler   Feb-05-04 07:28 PM   #9 
  - Excellent idea.  Darranar   Feb-05-04 07:51 PM   #15 
  - Republicans will say...  TexasMexican   Feb-05-04 08:10 PM   #21 
  - They will say that no matter what.  Carl Spackler   Feb-05-04 08:11 PM   #22 
  - Rationalist perspective  TorchesAndPitchforks   Feb-05-04 08:47 PM   #26 
  - Here's the response argument you can anticipate  Carl Spackler   Feb-05-04 08:57 PM   #28 
     - Rights and Rationalism and Religion  TorchesAndPitchforks   Feb-05-04 09:13 PM   #29 
  - Separate but equal...  tobius   Feb-05-04 08:56 PM   #27 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC