LincolnMcGrath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-04-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 30. Well, at least she would get her chance to ban flag burning maybe? |
|
Problem is, what if another BK bill come to the floor, who will be co-leader as Hillary hides under her chair?
|
| -FWIW: Rumor of plan for HRC to succeed Harry Reid IF she doesn't run in 08 |
AlGore-08.com |
Aug-03-06 11:35 AM |
#0 |
-
Senate leader or presidential candidate |
dwickham |
Aug-03-06 11:39 AM |
#1 |
 -
In 2016 she will be about 70 years old |
bottomofthehill |
Aug-03-06 11:49 AM |
#5 |
-
Not necessarily, with modern medicine 70 isn't "too old" to be President |
AlGore-08.com |
Aug-03-06 11:58 AM |
#6 |
-
she was born in 1947 |
dwickham |
Aug-03-06 02:44 PM |
#12 |
-
Reagan was 69 when he first ran |
AlGore-08.com |
Aug-03-06 03:59 PM |
#13 |
-
And he turned out fine! |
rep the dems |
Aug-04-06 03:49 PM |
#24 |
-
I would much rather see her as Senate Leader now... |
madame defarge |
Aug-03-06 11:44 AM |
#2 |
-
Great... The top DLC bigwig in charge of the Democrats in the Senate... |
Totally Committed |
Aug-03-06 11:45 AM |
#3 |
-
Maybe a position as leader in the Senate will keep her from running |
Warpy |
Aug-03-06 11:48 AM |
#4 |
-
Having Hillary would bring more media attention to what Dems are doing |
Mabus |
Aug-03-06 12:03 PM |
#7 |
-
That would be a nightmare, non-progress for Dem party to put DLC in charge |
zann725 |
Aug-03-06 12:07 PM |
#8 |
 -
she'd tack back toward the left as dem leader |
BlueManDude |
Aug-03-06 05:32 PM |
#19 |
-
She would do an excellent job... |
SaveElmer |
Aug-03-06 12:08 PM |
#9 |
-
Reid is nervous about being re-elected in 2010. |
TheVirginian |
Aug-03-06 12:12 PM |
#10 |
 -
Which is why... |
SaveElmer |
Aug-03-06 12:13 PM |
#11 |
 -
He didn't have much trouble in '04 |
Hippo_Tron |
Aug-03-06 04:03 PM |
#14 |
-
And the GOP targeted him big time. Remember them calling him a traitor? |
AlGore-08.com |
Aug-03-06 04:07 PM |
#16 |
-
Richard Ziser was a neo-phyte, and '96 proved Reid was vulnerable. |
TheVirginian |
Aug-03-06 04:26 PM |
#17 |
-
Senator Durbin should get the job, IMO |
Hippo_Tron |
Aug-03-06 04:07 PM |
#15 |
 -
Yes, Durbin would. We have to look at seniority and duty to the party |
nealmhughes |
Aug-03-06 08:20 PM |
#21 |
 -
Agree 100% |
WildEyedLiberal |
Aug-04-06 12:40 PM |
#23 |
-
anything to keep her out of 2008. n/t |
BlueManDude |
Aug-03-06 05:31 PM |
#18 |
-
I think she'd be a losing presidential candidate.. |
sendero |
Aug-03-06 06:07 PM |
#20 |
 -
she'd be a losing candidate |
dwickham |
Aug-04-06 12:29 PM |
#22 |
-
Would you rather vote republican? |
rep the dems |
Aug-04-06 03:53 PM |
#25 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-04-06 05:29 PM |
#26 |
-
So in other words don't vote vote for the republican, |
rep the dems |
Aug-04-06 09:49 PM |
#27 |
-
and Hillary has a chance to win? |
dwickham |
Aug-04-06 10:39 PM |
#28 |
-
She would have a better chance than any 3rd party candidate. |
rep the dems |
Aug-04-06 10:43 PM |
#29 |
-
probably actually did? |
dwickham |
Aug-05-06 10:17 AM |
#32 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-05-06 11:50 AM |
#33 |
-
You're right. |
rep the dems |
Aug-05-06 03:35 PM |
#34 |
-
maybe if Kerry would have challenged the vote in Ohio |
dwickham |
Aug-05-06 10:11 PM |
#35 |
-
I agree with you to an extent, but despite all that |
rep the dems |
Aug-06-06 02:41 PM |
#36 |
 -
Nader was never a Green |
dwickham |
Aug-06-06 10:57 PM |
#37 |
-
I don't care what bullshit party he considers himself, |
rep the dems |
Aug-07-06 03:29 PM |
#39 |
-
first of all, I never voted for Nader |
dwickham |
Aug-07-06 05:09 PM |
#40 |
-
If you're going to run for President of the United States |
rep the dems |
Aug-07-06 05:26 PM |
#41 |
-
You just contradicted yourself. |
blm |
Aug-07-06 02:44 PM |
#38 |
-
Well, at least she would get her chance to ban flag burning maybe? |
LincolnMcGrath |
Aug-04-06 10:45 PM |
#30 |
-
I'd rather have her in that position. |
Vidar |
Aug-05-06 01:21 AM |
#31 |