Reply #93: The last thing we need is to alienate mainstream voters.

[skyblue]

Several candidates is probably better because I think it might be a better moneymaker. The problem is that eventually 1 candidate will rag on another making both weaker in a general election. The problem is that eventually 1 candidate will probably suck up to Dem constituents with ideas that won't fly in a general election which might cause them to win the primary, but will become a major problem when it comes to the general election. But people get all pissy and want candidates to follow their own agenda up to and beyond the white picket fence rather than follow a winning agenda..........

Whatever It Takes! If that means voting for someone who voted to authorize Chimpy to use force then Hey I DON'T GIVE A CRAP!!!! If he's a candidate who will WIN that is FAR more important than that vote.
I want a President who will acknowledge Global Warming and not be a sissy when it comes to standing up to corporate polluters who perhaps may have mercury emissions et al.. which could possibly help to cause children's asthma and the breast cancer that 1 in 7 women get. I don't want my taxes to pay for another Terry Schiavo to spend over a decade in a hospital. I want these Recreeps out of office!


:kick: