You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: On edit: That should have been W.R. Pitt regarding Scott Ritter. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. On edit: That should have been W.R. Pitt regarding Scott Ritter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Just another brick in the wall BurgherHoldtheLies  Apr-06-06 07:29 PM   #0 
  - It's horrifying isn't it? To think of these "ordinary" persons planning  patrice   Apr-06-06 07:37 PM   #1 
     - Sometimes, having your suspicions confirmed is bittersweet.  BurgherHoldtheLies   Apr-06-06 07:45 PM   #2 
        - It is good to know one isn't going nuts.  patrice   Apr-06-06 08:05 PM   #3 
           - For months before the invasion of Iraq I was telling people that  Arkansas Granny   Apr-06-06 08:13 PM   #4 
              - I was reading Scott Ritter before Bush's "decision".  patrice   Apr-06-06 08:18 PM   #5 
                 - Oh, I know. Bush was in such a hurry to get his licks in on Saddam  Arkansas Granny   Apr-06-06 08:21 PM   #6 
                 - Make you weep: First-graders get sad news about 'adopted' soldier  BurgherHoldtheLies   Apr-06-06 08:29 PM   #7 
                 - Oh, how terrible. I can't imagine how hard it must have been to  Arkansas Granny   Apr-06-06 08:48 PM   #8 
                 - On edit: That should have been W.R. Pitt regarding Scott Ritter.  patrice   Apr-07-06 12:35 PM   #10 
                 - Scott Ritter  AusGail   Apr-07-06 01:58 AM   #9 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC