MH1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-29-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
Who needs 'em and why would you base your positions on them?  |
| -Cowering Dems - Only 3 Senators' names are on Feingold's resolution. |
paineinthearse |
Mar-29-06 03:54 PM |
#0 |
 -
We know what to do! Time to make some more calls, DUers! |
fooj |
Mar-29-06 03:56 PM |
#1 |
  -
WRONG - demanding censure vote now is SIDING with GOPs. |
blm |
Mar-29-06 04:14 PM |
#10 |
| -
I don't think everyone is demanding |
guidod |
Mar-29-06 05:53 PM |
#33 |
| -
Caving in to demand for quickvote by GOPs and bypassing investigation by |
blm |
Mar-29-06 06:04 PM |
#37 |
| -
so it's been moved to committee... that happend already.. |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:07 PM |
#39 |
| -
Dems wanting to stop committee and investigation and side with GOPs |
blm |
Mar-29-06 06:12 PM |
#42 |
| -
I think that was to show who was willing to Censure Clinton but is AWOL on |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:35 PM |
#48 |
| -
Willing to censure Clinton INSTEAD OF impeaching him. If you AREN'T on |
blm |
Mar-29-06 06:41 PM |
#50 |
| -
If we give up on censure, will we still even be opposing the GOP at all? |
Ken Burch |
Mar-30-06 02:42 PM |
#114 |
| -
exatly so.. |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 02:51 PM |
#118 |
| -
Who is giving up on censure? The committee investigation is FOR censure. |
blm |
Mar-30-06 03:19 PM |
#123 |
| -
Never mind, I guess I don't understand what those who oppose Feingold |
Ken Burch |
Mar-30-06 07:37 PM |
#131 |
| -
Calling for left blogs to stop harrassing senators supporting Feingold's |
blm |
Mar-31-06 08:45 AM |
#134 |
| -
when does siding with censure = quick vote? |
dionysus |
Mar-30-06 10:29 PM |
#132 |
| -
READ and understand - we are FOR CENSURE and the moment Feingold |
blm |
Mar-31-06 09:21 AM |
#135 |
| -
LOL.. |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:06 PM |
#38 |
| -
I understand that the word trength |
guidod |
Mar-29-06 06:17 PM |
#45 |
| -
I don't think everyone is demanding |
guidod |
Mar-29-06 05:53 PM |
#34 |
| -
Woops! Hit the button twice, sorry |
guidod |
Mar-29-06 05:55 PM |
#35 |
| -
Drinkin Arlen Specter/Joe Biden Cool aid - It's called another Cover Up |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:04 PM |
#36 |
| -
Either you side w/Feingold and furthering censure debate or side w/GOP |
blm |
Mar-29-06 06:09 PM |
#40 |
| -
My apologies.. i'm frustrated. |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:38 PM |
#49 |
| -
WRONG - Hearings are set for Friday and John Dean and Bruce Fein are |
blm |
Mar-29-06 06:49 PM |
#53 |
| -
I stand Corrected! Good More Testimony! |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 07:05 PM |
#57 |
| -
Why are you spreading that BOGUS list of Dems who wanted censure INSTEAD |
blm |
Mar-29-06 04:00 PM |
#2 |
| -
I wholeheartedly agree it is much better strategy. |
AtomicKitten |
Mar-29-06 04:04 PM |
#4 |
| -
Feinstein tried to bring up censure resolution again right after acquittal |
flpoljunkie |
Mar-29-06 04:06 PM |
#6 |
| -
Okay, I'm convinced. Feingold is an ass. |
MH1 |
Mar-29-06 05:08 PM |
#24 |
| -
I Hope you mean FeinSTEIN (a DINO), NOT FeinGOLD... |
BlueCaliDem04 |
Mar-30-06 02:26 AM |
#66 |
| -
Feingold WAS a senator in the Clinton years |
Mass |
Mar-30-06 07:10 AM |
#68 |
| -
Haven't been into politics until *after* the 2000 Debacle. But... |
BlueCaliDem04 |
Mar-31-06 02:05 AM |
#133 |
| -
I meant FeinGOLD. Please read my post. |
MH1 |
Mar-30-06 08:43 AM |
#78 |
| -
Feingold did NOT support the Clinton censure. |
incapsulated |
Apr-01-06 01:39 AM |
#166 |
| -
Disappointed in Levin, Stabenow from Michigan |
faygokid |
Mar-29-06 04:01 PM |
#3 |
| -
Their constituency is not a monolith composed of DUers and like-minded. |
MH1 |
Mar-29-06 05:14 PM |
#28 |
| -
I think it's the right thing to do. |
faygokid |
Mar-29-06 05:19 PM |
#29 |
| -
We're all for censure - and FOR Feingold moving it into committee |
blm |
Mar-29-06 05:30 PM |
#30 |
| -
oops... self delete duplicate |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:11 PM |
#41 |
| -
Wrong - Feingold had said it was set for Friday. |
blm |
Mar-29-06 06:13 PM |
#44 |
| -
BLM it was moved to committee two weeks ago, the moment Feingold |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:12 PM |
#43 |
| -
You may be right (or not), but in any case it is beside my point. |
MH1 |
Mar-29-06 05:33 PM |
#31 |
| -
Censure Could have Meaningful Consequence, but Not with These Dems |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:22 PM |
#46 |
| -
I'm FOR censure but know it has no meaningful consequence and |
blm |
Mar-29-06 06:33 PM |
#47 |
| -
do you actually believe impeachment investigations and hearings |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:41 PM |
#51 |
| -
I trust that Conyers and others are dead serious. I hope the Clintonites |
blm |
Mar-29-06 06:43 PM |
#52 |
| -
Want to make a wager that the Clintonistas will quash that attempt |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 06:54 PM |
#55 |
| -
Is anyone who wants us to lay off of Bush even going to think about |
Ken Burch |
Mar-30-06 02:44 PM |
#115 |
| -
K & R! |
msgadget |
Mar-29-06 04:05 PM |
#5 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-29-06 04:07 PM |
#7 |
| -
k&r |
radio4progressives |
Mar-29-06 04:09 PM |
#8 |
| -
THIS IS NOT TRUE - The moment Feingold moved censure into committee is the |
blm |
Mar-29-06 04:12 PM |
#9 |
| -
It wasn't Feingold who moved the Resolution to Committee, it was Durbin |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 01:59 PM |
#102 |
| -
Thanks paineinthearse |
AuntiBush |
Mar-29-06 04:22 PM |
#11 |
| -
Except it's selling A FALSE PREMISE. The info in it is BAD. |
blm |
Mar-29-06 04:24 PM |
#13 |
| -
The info is not bad - it is revealing who voted for Censure of Clinton |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 01:36 PM |
#92 |
| -
YES, it's bad - If you're NOT on that list you wanted IMPEACHMENT PROCESS |
blm |
Mar-30-06 03:45 PM |
#128 |
| -
STUPID left bloggers supporting GOP demand for quick censure vote to STOP |
blm |
Mar-29-06 04:23 PM |
#12 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-29-06 04:46 PM |
#22 |
| -
Siding WITH Feingold's moving censure into committee to continue |
blm |
Mar-29-06 04:58 PM |
#23 |
| -
No. It's stupid to call people stupid because they don't agree with you. |
katinmn |
Mar-29-06 05:09 PM |
#25 |
| -
There are left bloggers spreading BAD INFO because they're not getting |
blm |
Mar-29-06 05:14 PM |
#27 |
| -
Committee investigation? Please. I'm getting a side ache. |
katinmn |
Mar-29-06 09:50 PM |
#58 |
| -
Apparently you disagree with Feingold whose committee is holding hearings |
blm |
Mar-30-06 09:09 AM |
#82 |
| -
People don't seem to be writing in to support blm on this... |
Iowa |
Mar-29-06 10:07 PM |
#60 |
| -
Facts, schmacts. |
MH1 |
Mar-29-06 05:10 PM |
#26 |
| -
Schmacts is right. Post 19 clearly shows the author's true color n/t |
ProSense |
Mar-29-06 06:57 PM |
#56 |
| -
Sorry...The question is: Why aren't they listed as Co-sponsors? |
farmbo |
Mar-30-06 08:03 AM |
#77 |
| -
WRONG - The MOMENT Feingold moved censure into committee the action |
blm |
Mar-30-06 09:17 AM |
#83 |
| -
Strawman alert: The co-sponsors aren't saying " vote now, no investigation |
farmbo |
Mar-30-06 11:57 AM |
#86 |
| -
Their SUPPORT for investigation helped GET THOSE HEARINGS FRIDAY. |
blm |
Mar-30-06 12:08 PM |
#87 |
| -
Bush has admitted skirting FISA...and given Congress the old "Vaffanculo!" |
farmbo |
Mar-30-06 01:02 PM |
#88 |
| -
Some already do and have been helpful to Feingold's push for hearings. |
blm |
Mar-30-06 01:11 PM |
#89 |
| -
Farmbo, I missed this little factoid... please clarify for me.. |
radio4progressives |
Apr-01-06 12:45 AM |
#163 |
| -
Check this out: from March 17th (Rove's handiwork) |
farmbo |
Apr-01-06 08:50 AM |
#169 |
| -
I agree with you |
Norquist Nemesis |
Mar-30-06 01:46 PM |
#98 |
| -
are you serious? Schumer's move was a complete OUT and END RUN |
radio4progressives |
Apr-01-06 12:48 AM |
#164 |
| -
hey, i like the aesthetics of your photo arrangement. |
rodeodance |
Mar-29-06 04:27 PM |
#14 |
| -
Act locally |
paineinthearse |
Mar-29-06 04:28 PM |
#15 |
| -
WHY are you supporting GOPs position instead of Feingold? |
blm |
Mar-29-06 04:41 PM |
#20 |
| -
I have called Kohl's office but will do so again. |
rodeodance |
Mar-29-06 04:29 PM |
#16 |
| -
the hearing is Friday (below)--email cspan and ask to cover. I checked |
rodeodance |
Mar-29-06 04:33 PM |
#17 |
| -
here is email address for cspan |
rodeodance |
Mar-29-06 04:37 PM |
#18 |
| -
BEWARE - The OP benefits the GOP position, NOT Feingold's. |
blm |
Mar-29-06 04:43 PM |
#21 |
| -
Why does this person's list keep changing? |
ProSense |
Mar-29-06 04:38 PM |
#19 |
| -
I've called Feinstein three times now. |
guidod |
Mar-29-06 05:39 PM |
#32 |
| -
DUers, take a BREATH!! |
WesDem |
Mar-29-06 06:52 PM |
#54 |
| -
absolutely correct. |
AtomicKitten |
Mar-29-06 09:51 PM |
#59 |
| -
I'm inclined to agree wth Paul Craig Roberts' assertion that Dems are |
Nothing Without Hope |
Mar-29-06 10:59 PM |
#61 |
| -
It would explain some of the very strange behavior of elected officials |
katinmn |
Mar-29-06 11:07 PM |
#62 |
| -
Exactly. Some of the GOPs, too, have acted very strangely, first |
Nothing Without Hope |
Mar-29-06 11:15 PM |
#63 |
| -
RFK Jr estimated last year that 95% of the GOPs and 75% of the Dems |
Nothing Without Hope |
Mar-29-06 11:19 PM |
#64 |
| -
Listen to what blm is saying... |
Andromeda |
Mar-30-06 01:18 AM |
#65 |
| -
"The time has come for Senate Democrats to stand up to George Bush and..." |
paineinthearse |
Mar-30-06 07:05 AM |
#67 |
| -
The author is not credible. Why does he keep changing the list? |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 07:24 AM |
#69 |
| -
The problem is that the focus is wrong - They should be calling committee |
Mass |
Mar-30-06 07:31 AM |
#72 |
| -
That's fine, but this article promotes a bogus argument on many levels n/t |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 07:35 AM |
#73 |
| -
We'll see what happens Friday - Specter seems committed to bring this |
Mass |
Mar-30-06 07:39 AM |
#74 |
| -
So, what is Feingold's excuse voting for Roberts? for Ascroft? ... |
Mass |
Mar-30-06 07:25 AM |
#70 |
| -
What is Feingold's excuse for not supporting DSM investigation? |
MH1 |
Mar-30-06 08:47 AM |
#79 |
| -
Except Feingold WANTS THEM TO SUPPORT INVESTIGATION AND HEARINGS |
blm |
Mar-30-06 09:36 AM |
#85 |
| -
Dems voted to Censure Clinton For a Blow Job, but Refuse to Censure Bush |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 01:38 PM |
#93 |
| -
You do know that censure then was to STOP impeachment process in the |
blm |
Mar-30-06 03:22 PM |
#124 |
| -
you seem to suggest that Censure is always in lieu of Impeachment |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 01:19 PM |
#150 |
| -
I never suggested that even once. |
blm |
Mar-31-06 01:29 PM |
#154 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-30-06 07:29 AM |
#71 |
| -
Not people who disagree, bloggers who spread FALSE INFO and help the GOP |
blm |
Mar-30-06 08:02 AM |
#76 |
| -
Show me the "FALSE INFO" |
paineinthearse |
Mar-30-06 08:55 AM |
#80 |
| -
The false info is saying the list supported censure for Clinton but DON'T |
blm |
Mar-30-06 09:31 AM |
#84 |
| -
Where's the Evidence that any of these Senators support Impeachment? |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 01:57 PM |
#100 |
| -
Senators have no business pre-judging impeachment, especially since |
blm |
Mar-30-06 03:35 PM |
#126 |
| -
Reading the Tea Leaves is not citing Secret Knowledge... |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 12:23 PM |
#140 |
| -
BLM this is getting a little bit over the top here... |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 01:42 PM |
#95 |
| -
Censure INSTEAD OF IMPEACHMENT |
WildEyedLiberal |
Mar-30-06 03:09 PM |
#121 |
| -
YOU don't know who is against censure because they haven't VOTED ON IT. |
blm |
Mar-30-06 03:26 PM |
#125 |
| -
i got this automated response from bill nelson |
flblu2 |
Mar-30-06 07:48 AM |
#75 |
| -
cowering???? or just dont agree with feingold on approach |
seabeyond |
Mar-30-06 09:05 AM |
#81 |
| -
yes, cowering. |
garybeck |
Mar-30-06 01:30 PM |
#91 |
| -
I can think of more for impeachment, Censure is weak! |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 01:40 PM |
#94 |
| -
If they won't go for Censure, they won't go for Impeachment.. |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 01:45 PM |
#97 |
| -
Isn't it obvious that until they take back Congress it's moot? n/t |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 01:58 PM |
#101 |
| -
I've been suggesting, that we won't see a Democratic Congress Impeach |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 02:25 PM |
#107 |
| -
Why stop everything. Is there Republican support for censure? n/t |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 02:31 PM |
#110 |
| -
Stop? Stopping what? |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 02:41 PM |
#113 |
| -
Hear ! Hear! |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 01:44 PM |
#96 |
| -
well they are doing "something". but obviously it doesnt matter to |
seabeyond |
Mar-30-06 02:03 PM |
#104 |
| -
btw, censor is fine with me, impeachment is fine with me, |
seabeyond |
Mar-30-06 02:04 PM |
#105 |
| -
speaking of rhetoric... what exactly ARE they doing? |
garybeck |
Mar-30-06 02:47 PM |
#116 |
| -
that's what i want to know.. exactly what are they doing? |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 02:53 PM |
#119 |
| -
exactly. the lack of response is your answer... |
garybeck |
Mar-31-06 12:38 PM |
#142 |
| -
Their lack of response reminds me of Scalia's jesture |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 01:17 PM |
#149 |
| -
What I don't get is that we have two men |
LittleClarkie |
Mar-31-06 12:47 PM |
#144 |
| -
I never saw this as a political stunt, or that Feingold would succeed |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 01:01 PM |
#146 |
| -
Did you see Kerry and the fillibuster as a stunt? |
LittleClarkie |
Mar-31-06 01:04 PM |
#147 |
| -
absolutely not... I was very pro-filibuster |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 01:15 PM |
#148 |
| -
Groovy. I was very disturbed when a Dem/near Green co-worker |
LittleClarkie |
Mar-31-06 01:28 PM |
#153 |
| -
Actually, R4P didn't support Kerry |
WildEyedLiberal |
Apr-01-06 01:03 PM |
#171 |
| -
Kerry shouldn't have HAD to lead it - he's not a judiciary Dem. |
blm |
Mar-31-06 01:37 PM |
#155 |
| -
Kerry wanted to lead this because it was a campaign promise |
radio4progressives |
Apr-01-06 12:39 AM |
#162 |
| -
BULLSHIT you did not! |
WildEyedLiberal |
Apr-01-06 01:01 PM |
#170 |
| -
the BIG missing point in all of this discussion is:::::> |
garybeck |
Mar-30-06 01:21 PM |
#90 |
| -
exactly |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 01:48 PM |
#99 |
| -
And how exactly does censure, attempted or real, stop Bush? |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 02:01 PM |
#103 |
| -
Censure Resolution Officially Puts him "On Notice" and |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 02:22 PM |
#106 |
| -
An investigation, with or without censure, can lead to impeachment n/t |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 02:26 PM |
#108 |
| -
true, but don't we also want prosecution and conviction? |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 02:28 PM |
#109 |
| -
Censure is not prosecution, and has no impact on an investigation. n/t |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 02:33 PM |
#111 |
| -
omg. i know that. |
radio4progressives |
Mar-30-06 02:38 PM |
#112 |
| -
I don't think you do. |
WildEyedLiberal |
Mar-30-06 03:11 PM |
#122 |
| -
who cares. |
garybeck |
Mar-30-06 02:49 PM |
#117 |
| -
I do. I don't want an apology from Bush. Americans don't know? n/t |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 02:53 PM |
#120 |
| -
no, they don't know. |
garybeck |
Mar-30-06 04:09 PM |
#129 |
| -
About 65% of the other half don't care, and the rest want proof. n/t |
ProSense |
Mar-30-06 04:17 PM |
#130 |
| -
Kennedy and Leahy already demanded ALL the NSA documents for the committee |
blm |
Mar-30-06 03:39 PM |
#127 |
| -
I note with interest |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Mar-31-06 11:35 AM |
#136 |
| -
Everything "Reflects Badly" on the Democrats |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 11:52 AM |
#137 |
| -
"censure motion's inevitable failure will reflect badly on the Democrats." |
garybeck |
Mar-31-06 12:41 PM |
#143 |
| -
I'm afraid this is rather what I mean. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Mar-31-06 01:26 PM |
#152 |
| -
Since when did defending the Bill of Rights become a "Far Left" issue? |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 02:49 PM |
#157 |
| -
Empty rhetoric. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Mar-31-06 03:10 PM |
#159 |
| -
Talk about Empty Rhetoric and Tortured Logic |
radio4progressives |
Apr-01-06 12:55 AM |
#165 |
| -
But it won't happen! |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Apr-01-06 04:04 AM |
#167 |
| -
they are all dirty and they know it. |
NVMojo |
Mar-31-06 11:54 AM |
#138 |
| -
My Hunch Proved Out Today & Feingold Nailed it when he said Cover Up! |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 11:58 AM |
#139 |
| -
Russ |
mdmc |
Mar-31-06 12:26 PM |
#141 |
| -
yes he does... bless his freedom rocking heart and soul... |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 12:50 PM |
#145 |
| -
I think you're wrong - Feingold SUCCEEDED TODAY - he forced media to cover |
blm |
Mar-31-06 01:23 PM |
#151 |
| -
Huh? There was no accountability for the Public Record Today.. |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 02:45 PM |
#156 |
| -
He got the Republican's defense on RECORD and the testimony FOR censure |
blm |
Mar-31-06 03:02 PM |
#158 |
| -
Yes I agree with this point, which is why I supported it to begin with |
radio4progressives |
Mar-31-06 03:14 PM |
#160 |
| -
That's what happens when you act on the fly - preparation and friends are |
blm |
Mar-31-06 06:47 PM |
#161 |
| -
Feingold 'succeeded' today? |
robcon |
Apr-01-06 07:55 AM |
#168 |
| -
Jesus! |
0007 |
Apr-01-06 01:04 PM |
#172 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread