You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: Hi Apple! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
35. Hi Apple!
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Would a Clinton Clinton ticket be legal? APPLE314  Mar-22-06 12:16 PM   #0 
  - no  notmypresident   Mar-22-06 12:18 PM   #1 
  - that makes sense  APPLE314   Mar-22-06 12:20 PM   #3 
  - the "same state" requirement can be circumvented  unblock   Mar-22-06 12:33 PM   #7 
  - Yep the very first CHEAT by Bush/Cheney.......  NativeTexan   Mar-22-06 12:41 PM   #12 
     - There is nothing illegal  Yupster   Mar-22-06 10:22 PM   #21 
        - Actually, it IS illegal.....  NativeTexan   Mar-23-06 12:12 AM   #30 
           - Just read the Twelfth Amendment  Yupster   Mar-23-06 08:55 AM   #34 
              - But, that means that since electors vote for a ticket....  NativeTexan   Mar-23-06 09:33 AM   #39 
                 - Sorry - I don't understand your post  Yupster   Mar-23-06 10:20 AM   #40 
  - have to be from a different state? i didn't know that.. ..  radio4progressives   Mar-22-06 12:38 PM   #9 
  - I think it is the 12th amendment  notmypresident   Mar-22-06 12:54 PM   #14 
  - What would have happened in 00  Yupster   Mar-22-06 10:28 PM   #23 
  - OK....I think YOU have finally got closer than the rest of us...  NativeTexan   Mar-23-06 06:20 PM   #41 
  - It's not correct that if Cheney was ruled a Texan  Yupster   Mar-23-06 07:05 PM   #44 
  - You didn't know it because  Yupster   Mar-22-06 10:22 PM   #22 
  - There wouldn't be any Democratic Candidates...  itzamirakul   Mar-23-06 08:38 AM   #33 
  - Former Presidents can't run again so NO it would NOT be legal nt  Minnesota Libra   Mar-22-06 12:20 PM   #2 
  - Grover Cleveland was a former president  Yupster   Mar-22-06 10:29 PM   #24 
  - First the VP must meant the same Requirements as the President  happyslug   Mar-22-06 12:20 PM   #4 
  - but on the other hand  notmypresident   Mar-22-06 12:23 PM   #5 
  - No. It would not be Constitutional.  bowens43   Mar-22-06 12:29 PM   #6 
  - GAAAAACK! Thanks for ruining my morning. As if it wasn't bad enough  Southsideirish   Mar-22-06 12:34 PM   #8 
  - The people have spoken  Freddie Stubbs   Mar-22-06 12:40 PM   #11 
  - You can serve but not be elected twice  democrat_06   Mar-22-06 12:38 PM   #10 
  - You are correct  notmypresident   Mar-22-06 12:57 PM   #15 
  - Hi democrat_06!!  newyawker99   Mar-22-06 01:43 PM   #16 
  - Hello  APPLE314   Mar-23-06 09:07 AM   #38 
  - No it is not correct  Yupster   Mar-22-06 10:32 PM   #25 
  - Hello!  bigwillq   Mar-23-06 08:57 AM   #36 
  - Aside from the same state thing...  TreasonousBastard   Mar-22-06 12:48 PM   #13 
  - Splitting fine hairs? No worries...that's what we are supposed to do in  MJDuncan1982   Mar-22-06 03:56 PM   #20 
     - The last line of the Twelfth Amendment is  Yupster   Mar-22-06 10:35 PM   #26 
        - That's the fine hair...  TreasonousBastard   Mar-23-06 12:41 AM   #31 
  - This question comes up here every few weeks  MathGuy   Mar-22-06 01:50 PM   #17 
  - Yup it sure does....and considering Bill never took a majority of the vote  formernaderite   Mar-22-06 03:08 PM   #18 
  - Shades of grey - it could go either way - I'm leaning toward not.  APPLE314   Mar-22-06 03:30 PM   #19 
  - Doesn't ineligible mean  Yupster   Mar-22-06 10:36 PM   #28 
  - Absolutely, and Chelsea will make a fine running mate.  mtnsnake   Mar-22-06 10:36 PM   #27 
  - I don't think he can because of the order of succesion. In other words  Crazy Guggenheim   Mar-22-06 10:44 PM   #29 
  - It could not happen  Apollo11   Mar-23-06 08:17 AM   #32 
  - Hi Apple!  bigwillq   Mar-23-06 08:57 AM   #35 
  - Hello  APPLE314   Mar-23-06 09:05 AM   #37 
  - The question would end up in the supreme court, which would say "no"  orangepeel68   Mar-23-06 06:44 PM   #42 
     - I think it is clear that Bill could not be Hillary's  Yupster   Mar-23-06 06:59 PM   #43 
        - I think so, too, but not every Constitutional scholar does  orangepeel68   Mar-23-06 07:19 PM   #45 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC