You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: Of course they are [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. Of course they are
Edited on Sat Mar-04-06 06:50 PM by FreedomAngel82
It's because they think they can beat her. Remember the thing with Karl Rove is that he turns someone's strength into a weakness. So this could be what is going on. They could be using Hillary to make us go against our good canidates out there like Feingold, Kerry and any potential governors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Do you get the sense they are trying to force Hillary on us? joeprogressive  Mar-04-06 01:47 PM   #0 
  - Yes  senseandsensibility   Mar-04-06 01:51 PM   #1 
  - ditto ;-)!  Quakerfriend   Mar-04-06 01:57 PM   #4 
  - The thing I like most about Gore  senseandsensibility   Mar-04-06 02:46 PM   #18 
  - The thing I dislike most about Gore...  Digit   Mar-05-06 12:14 AM   #56 
     - That bothers me too  senseandsensibility   Mar-05-06 12:37 AM   #59 
        - Don't get me wrong, I really like Al Gore....  Digit   Mar-05-06 01:30 AM   #61 
           - politically  marions ghost   Mar-05-06 05:28 PM   #83 
  - At least not now anyways  FreedomAngel82   Mar-04-06 06:51 PM   #34 
  - ABSOLUTELY!  kick_them_hard   Mar-04-06 03:34 PM   #22 
     - And your proof is where now?  FreedomAngel82   Mar-04-06 06:51 PM   #35 
  - Yes, yes, yes.  barbaraann   Mar-04-06 01:54 PM   #2 
  - Absolutely. They have to give the "Base" a focus for their hate...  TomInTib   Mar-04-06 01:55 PM   #3 
  - Yes and I'm getting tired of hearing it. nt  Vinca   Mar-04-06 01:57 PM   #5 
  - I don't know about "rightful heirs" altho I love Gore  CTyankee   Mar-04-06 01:58 PM   #6 
  - Hillary is the safety valve for the ruling class!  IndianaGreen   Mar-04-06 02:01 PM   #7 
  - A new 'new deal' is exactly what would inspire me. I'd like to see...  laststeamtrain   Mar-04-06 02:17 PM   #11 
  - Symbolism  marions ghost   Mar-05-06 05:38 PM   #84 
  - Correct..  Donna Zen   Mar-05-06 08:45 AM   #64 
  - Yes, for over a year. They'd LOVE to run against Hillary. I guess what  lulu in NC   Mar-04-06 02:04 PM   #8 
  - I think and feel that is so  libodem   Mar-04-06 02:07 PM   #9 
  - no doubt about it.  mexicoxpat   Mar-04-06 02:14 PM   #10 
  - And you also have to remember with the republicans  FreedomAngel82   Mar-04-06 06:53 PM   #36 
  - Yes.  TankLV   Mar-04-06 02:19 PM   #12 
  - Oh, most definitely. Hillary would divide the Dems and rally the  Nay   Mar-04-06 02:21 PM   #13 
  - The only ones talking about Hillary running are the Repukes  liberal N proud   Mar-04-06 02:29 PM   #14 
  - Al Franken, Jerry Springer, and Ed Schultz are talking about it too...  Frank Cannon   Mar-05-06 10:07 AM   #68 
  - Why would any Dem want to sink Hillary's  Deb   Mar-04-06 02:35 PM   #15 
  - Yes they are, that way they can make the election about her (lots  madmom   Mar-04-06 02:40 PM   #16 
  - Let them talk her up--it's ALL GOOD  MADem   Mar-04-06 02:43 PM   #17 
  - Watch for them to start pouring money  spindrifter   Mar-04-06 02:48 PM   #19 
  - Recently I remember reading earlier this week  FreedomAngel82   Mar-04-06 06:55 PM   #37 
  - Yes I do  Sydnie   Mar-04-06 02:53 PM   #20 
  - "It is entirely possible that people are that dumb"  greyhound1966   Mar-04-06 03:27 PM   #21 
  - Why else do they have the "liberal media" myth?  FreedomAngel82   Mar-04-06 06:56 PM   #38 
  - Hillary Shouldn't Run  originalpckelly   Mar-04-06 03:36 PM   #23 
  - When I mention Gore -- "He lost his home state."  ChipsAhoy   Mar-04-06 03:38 PM   #24 
  - When Tucker Carlson kept baiting James Carville on the  senseandsensibility   Mar-04-06 03:45 PM   #25 
  - OH wow!!  ChipsAhoy   Mar-04-06 03:48 PM   #26 
  - There was quite a bit of election fraud in Tennessee.  kath   Mar-04-06 04:31 PM   #27 
  - Only by 3% and things have changed since 2000 too  FreedomAngel82   Mar-04-06 06:58 PM   #40 
  - There were voting irregularities in TN, too.  Lars39   Mar-04-06 10:08 PM   #47 
  - It's the corporate-funded MSM.....  election_2004   Mar-04-06 04:41 PM   #28 
  - I say GORE/HILLARY in 2008!!!!  laugle   Mar-04-06 05:23 PM   #29 
  - I would love Al Gore to run in 2008.  AtomicKitten   Mar-04-06 05:29 PM   #30 
     - I totally agree with you! It's obvious to me that  laugle   Mar-04-06 09:53 PM   #44 
     - *gasp*  election_2004   Mar-04-06 10:11 PM   #48 
        - Hey election 2004, how you doing?  laugle   Mar-04-06 10:17 PM   #51 
           - If it's too early....  election_2004   Mar-05-06 12:04 AM   #54 
     - Then why is it....  election_2004   Mar-04-06 10:08 PM   #46 
        - let's do the math  AtomicKitten   Mar-04-06 10:27 PM   #53 
           - So if Hillary's main priority was to serve the people of NY....  election_2004   Mar-05-06 12:06 AM   #55 
  - Hillary will be a formidible candidate...  SaveElmer   Mar-04-06 05:32 PM   #31 
  - I'm with you.  mantis49   Mar-04-06 06:40 PM   #32 
  - Of course they are  FreedomAngel82   Mar-04-06 06:49 PM   #33 
  - YES - Corporate media is trying to create an aura of inevitability  iconoclastNYC   Mar-04-06 06:58 PM   #39 
  - Yes. And I hope to hell we DON'T FALL FOR IT!  hippiechick   Mar-04-06 07:02 PM   #41 
  - Here We Go Again!  ChiciB1   Mar-04-06 07:04 PM   #42 
  - None of this makes any difference until after the '06 election...  rasputin1952   Mar-04-06 07:04 PM   #43 
  - I agree about Gore but disagree that Hillary's "been an embarrassment  mtnsnake   Mar-04-06 10:06 PM   #45 
  - My examples would start with voting for war  joeprogressive   Mar-04-06 10:12 PM   #50 
     - Ok but you said "as of late". On the war vote you cant just single her out  mtnsnake   Mar-04-06 10:21 PM   #52 
        - Hmmmm, don't see Dean, Clark, Feingold or Gore on that list  joeprogressive   Mar-05-06 01:27 PM   #76 
  - A Hillary nomination  Blue_In_AK   Mar-04-06 10:11 PM   #49 
  - Yes, because they know she can't win  Digit   Mar-05-06 12:16 AM   #57 
  - Agreed  Czolgosz   Mar-05-06 12:19 AM   #58 
  - The Republicans are acting as if Hillary's nomination is a done deal  Lydia Leftcoast   Mar-05-06 12:39 AM   #60 
  - Repubs want you to eat your own and.......  Minnesota Libra   Mar-05-06 06:45 AM   #62 
  - Sure they are. She's an easy target. She's a woman and a Clinton.  spanone   Mar-05-06 08:37 AM   #63 
  - You were fine until the endorsement of Gore.  MookieWilson   Mar-05-06 08:49 AM   #65 
  - here's an internet trend analysis that indicates otherwise  AtomicKitten   Mar-05-06 12:36 PM   #71 
  - What's an "Internet Trend Analysis?" nt  MookieWilson   Mar-05-06 01:07 PM   #75 
     - It's from AmericaBlog.com - an analysis of internet buzz  AtomicKitten   Mar-05-06 03:29 PM   #78 
        - The Internet blog population is not indicative of the general US ...  MookieWilson   Mar-05-06 04:16 PM   #80 
           - Still I believe his popularity is more than you give him credit for.  AtomicKitten   Mar-05-06 05:01 PM   #82 
              - I like Gore and LOVED his speech at DAR hall.  MookieWilson   Mar-05-06 07:26 PM   #85 
  - He's popular as hell with me  HeeBGBz   Mar-05-06 12:47 PM   #73 
  - I have to disagree  joeprogressive   Mar-05-06 01:30 PM   #77 
  - Yes  Vidar   Mar-05-06 09:01 AM   #66 
  - Yes. It's to fire up the base and nothing more. nt  blondeatlast   Mar-05-06 09:38 AM   #67 
  - We need to start pushing Dan Quayle as the only serious successor...  Frank Cannon   Mar-05-06 10:14 AM   #69 
  - I agree totally...  infogirl   Mar-05-06 12:28 PM   #70 
  - Very much so  HeeBGBz   Mar-05-06 12:46 PM   #72 
  - NO!  0007   Mar-05-06 01:04 PM   #74 
  - become a media activist now (link)  radio4progressives   Mar-05-06 03:52 PM   #79 
     - It's not about Sen. Clinton.  Disturbed   Mar-05-06 04:54 PM   #81 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC