You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: not sure what your point is ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. not sure what your point is ...
Edited on Sat Mar-04-06 08:40 PM by welshTerrier2
it is the sole domain of Congress to allocate funds for war ... the Constitution gives Congress the ability to fund wars and cut-off funding for wars ...

Congress can say that no funds are to be spent after any date they choose ... that date would be a deadline date ... providing such a date for the cut-off of funds would force the President to operate according to the will of the Congress ... it would force the President to make a plan that is controlled, at its end point, by a "date certain" ...

no ultimate outcome is guaranteed ... the President and the military might or might not achieve whatever stated objectives they have provided by the "date certain" ... they would, however, have been put on notice that the Congress will not allow an open-ended conflict ...

it is certainly valid to argue, as too many Democrats have argued, that the situation in Iraq should dictate events rather than a cut-off date ... I disagree ... if you want me to pick a date, my date certain is Sunday, March 5, 2006.

my argument with those supporting "benchmarks" without supporting a cut-off date is that I don't believe anything positive is being achieved in Iraq ... we'll be talking about benchmarks 10 years from now while the US continues to exploit Iraqi oil through PSA's and pressure from the World Bank and continues to destabilize Iraq's internal politics for their own greedy objectives ... if I had an ounce of faith in the goals of those who control the levers of power in the US, I might consider, given demonstrable progress, a phased withdrawal based on benchmarks ...

because I do not trust those in power or the objectives of the US government, nor do I see any progress in Iraq after 3 years of war and occupation, I see no viable path beyond immediate withdrawal ... for those who like to toss around "purist" labels, yes, I would be willing to compromise to some degree ... but the compromise can never result in an open-ended war ... absent a "date certain" or clear proof of progress in Iraq, compromise on either immediate withdrawal or a "near-term" date certain is not possible ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC