RogueTrooper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-22-06 04:30 AM
Response to Original message |
|
the best way for the Democrats to capitalize on this politicaly is to do nothing? Otherwise we are demogogues? When has that play ever worked for the Democrats?
|
| -Dubai Ports -- Inept Dem politics AGAIN |
JamRock |
Feb-21-06 12:01 PM |
#0 |
-
Dems just don't seem to know ... |
NanceGreggs |
Feb-21-06 12:05 PM |
#1 |
 -
It's the media that makes hay of things. |
iconoclastNYC |
Feb-21-06 01:02 PM |
#11 |
-
it is the Corporate Neo Conservative Media that is upset with the ports |
Supersedeas |
Feb-21-06 02:30 PM |
#23 |
-
At least we have Air America. n/t |
iconocrastic |
Feb-22-06 12:33 AM |
#31 |
-
actually, your post is premature expectoration. |
antifaschits |
Feb-21-06 12:05 PM |
#2 |
 -
One name Joe Biden, the scourge of pooches everywhere. |
gordianot |
Feb-21-06 12:11 PM |
#3 |
-
Good ol' Joe Leiberman has been there already |
canichelouis |
Feb-21-06 12:28 PM |
#6 |
 -
No kidding, is Holy Joe going against *? |
gordianot |
Feb-21-06 12:55 PM |
#8 |
-
UH, Joe veneers over cooked at the tanning salon n/t |
Tellurian |
Feb-23-06 07:36 AM |
#54 |
-
Your analysis is simplistic and devoid of any data to |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-21-06 12:18 PM |
#4 |
 -
I happen to have a little knowledge about Port Facilities Operators |
JamRock |
Feb-21-06 12:52 PM |
#7 |
  -
One thing to remember about ports. Favorite target of spies. |
gordianot |
Feb-21-06 01:05 PM |
#13 |
   -
that's an interesting point to observe... |
radio4progressives |
Feb-21-06 01:48 PM |
#17 |
   -
Dubai run opperations is the worst cover for any spy in anti-arab environ |
JamRock |
Feb-21-06 11:37 PM |
#30 |
  -
So I am correct that you are positing that keeping quiet now and |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-21-06 02:05 PM |
#21 |
 -
Not as true Security issue. So oppose but don't demagogue until the |
JamRock |
Feb-21-06 04:17 PM |
#25 |
 -
And real damn dangerous |
RazzleDazzle |
Feb-21-06 04:57 PM |
#28 |
 -
Bingo. n/t |
iconocrastic |
Feb-22-06 12:35 AM |
#32 |
-
Agreed |
John Barrett |
Feb-21-06 12:24 PM |
#5 |
 -
The Democrats won the last two elections. Where have you been? |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-21-06 01:04 PM |
#12 |
  -
Comments |
John Barrett |
Feb-23-06 09:50 AM |
#59 |
 -
Whoa!! I am frankly staggered by the sanity of your remarks here. |
JamRock |
Feb-21-06 01:17 PM |
#15 |
 -
As a Leftist, very Intent in Having the Left Be Heard, Please Demonstrate |
radio4progressives |
Feb-21-06 01:51 PM |
#18 |
-
Defined The Party |
John Barrett |
Feb-23-06 10:05 AM |
#60 |
-
The Republicans HAVE to disagree, if they are smart..... |
NativeTexan |
Feb-21-06 12:56 PM |
#9 |
-
Did Anyone See Pres. Jimmy Carter's Remarks With Wolfie B. Yesterday? |
ChiciB1 |
Feb-21-06 12:58 PM |
#10 |
 -
Apparently the Ports have been Owned and Controlled by Multi-Nationals |
radio4progressives |
Feb-21-06 01:53 PM |
#19 |
-
Actually, this was an issue that enraged Conservative pieces of |
FrenchieCat |
Feb-21-06 01:08 PM |
#14 |
-
I'm no Defender of stupid politics but Bush has been given so much |
radio4progressives |
Feb-21-06 01:35 PM |
#16 |
-
Whatever!!! |
Dawgs |
Feb-21-06 02:02 PM |
#20 |
-
I don't agree with the premise of this post - what i want to know : |
radio4progressives |
Feb-21-06 02:25 PM |
#22 |
 -
Check this post. |
gordianot |
Feb-21-06 02:34 PM |
#24 |
 -
Not only this, but aren't they running the British Ports too? |
dubya_dubya_III |
Feb-21-06 04:35 PM |
#27 |
-
Clever screen name. n/t |
iconocrastic |
Feb-22-06 12:39 AM |
#33 |
-
But seriously tho |
dubya_dubya_III |
Feb-22-06 07:43 AM |
#37 |
-
No! You do not put the country at risk just to have |
karynnj |
Feb-21-06 04:21 PM |
#26 |
 -
This Port Conglomerate Deal -- Not a real Port Security problem. |
JamRock |
Feb-21-06 05:24 PM |
#29 |
-
You are saying that |
RogueTrooper |
Feb-22-06 04:30 AM |
#34 |
-
Guess how the GOP would respond? |
Azathoth |
Feb-22-06 04:36 AM |
#35 |
 -
This was not subject to Congressional oversight, but Admin review |
JamRock |
Feb-22-06 10:07 AM |
#43 |
-
I agree -- there are far more serious issues the Dems should be addressing |
Azathoth |
Feb-22-06 09:02 PM |
#50 |
-
another bush fuck up..... another attack dem thread. n/t |
seabeyond |
Feb-22-06 07:07 AM |
#36 |
 -
Yep. Interesting how that works, isn't it? n/t |
QC |
Feb-23-06 10:15 AM |
#62 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-22-06 07:45 AM |
#38 |
-
Not true! This issue couldn't be let to simmer. Deadline for the deal |
napi21 |
Feb-22-06 07:55 AM |
#39 |
-
first of all... |
Acebass |
Feb-22-06 09:18 AM |
#40 |
-
But we're not blind... |
Acebass |
Feb-22-06 09:26 AM |
#41 |
 -
The time is now to undermine Bush's "tough on terror" campaign-not in Oct |
submerged99 |
Feb-22-06 10:02 AM |
#42 |
-
The irony is... |
Acebass |
Feb-22-06 10:17 AM |
#44 |
-
My point is that some Dems are jumping the gun without strategy |
JamRock |
Feb-22-06 10:26 AM |
#45 |
 -
Why would he back out? |
submerged99 |
Feb-22-06 10:33 AM |
#46 |
-
Just watch! We have given Repub enough warning of the price |
JamRock |
Feb-22-06 10:39 AM |
#47 |
-
Agree, a sustained pressure campaign |
OzarkDem |
Feb-23-06 08:11 AM |
#58 |
-
Or you could look at it another way. |
AtomicKitten |
Feb-22-06 01:24 PM |
#48 |
 -
Good Points. I do think SOME Dems are demagoguing for Short-term advantage |
JamRock |
Feb-22-06 01:43 PM |
#49 |
-
It doesn't matter what the repuglicans do.. |
Tellurian |
Feb-22-06 09:32 PM |
#51 |
-
you don't - it's as simple as that. |
AtomicKitten |
Feb-22-06 09:46 PM |
#52 |
-
I'll drink to that, AcomicKitten! n/t |
Tellurian |
Feb-23-06 02:42 AM |
#53 |
-
This is your Fifth Thread telling Dems to make political hay... |
Bridget Burke |
Feb-23-06 07:42 AM |
#55 |
-
LOL! Yeah, there's a strategy - just lie low and don't criticize |
FLDem5 |
Feb-23-06 07:50 AM |
#56 |
-
Welcome to DU - I disagree |
OzarkDem |
Feb-23-06 08:09 AM |
#57 |
-
Inept Republican politics - AGAIN |
Beelzebud |
Feb-23-06 10:08 AM |
#61 |
-
So Democrats should shut up, do nothing, let BushCo do whatever it wants |
Sparkly |
Feb-23-06 10:17 AM |
#63 |