second edition
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 22. The Republicans don't want Kerry to run. This is a right wing paper. |
|
The article is done for no other reason but to sell the magazine and the paper is carrying it as a service to the conservative viewership. If John Kerry had no support, it wouldn't be news and it wouldn't be carried by this news-rag paper or even written about in the magazine.
I would consider the sources with this hit piece.
I will also add, I personally don't care what the so called "insiders" or other supposedly former Kerry supporters have to say-they all have their own agendas and I'm sure none were quoted with names given.
If John Kerry runs again, and he is certainly entitled to do that, he will have my support.
|
| -NYDN gossip: Kerry spokesman battling upcoming GQ story |
DeepModem Mom |
Jan-19-06 11:24 AM |
#0 |
 -
I'm sorry did Kerry do something embarassing like put on a flight suit |
noahmijo |
Jan-19-06 11:29 AM |
#1 |
| -
Kerry is toast. |
Teaser |
Jan-19-06 11:33 AM |
#2 |
 -
Which Democratic "tool" controls the editting rooms of broadcast media? |
blm |
Jan-19-06 11:40 AM |
#4 |
| -
I disagree!! n/t |
second edition |
Jan-19-06 12:07 PM |
#23 |
| -
I don't agree. |
renie408 |
Jan-19-06 12:16 PM |
#31 |
| -
I would like a Kerry presidency but i do think he is toast. His moment |
henslee |
Jan-19-06 12:50 PM |
#41 |
 -
I'm not looking for a tool at all |
LittleClarkie |
Jan-19-06 07:45 PM |
#98 |
| -
Maybe they're pissed he gave Esquire an exclusive interview |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 11:39 AM |
#3 |
| -
Anyone who supports Kerry for 2008 might as well just vote Republican |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 11:41 AM |
#5 |
| -
He's a viable candidate, but can't win? Bush stole the WH, twice. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 11:45 AM |
#7 |
| -
Hey, I voted for him |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 11:49 AM |
#10 |
| -
Who says he's a loser in the public mind? The Media? |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 11:54 AM |
#15 |
| -
No. |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 11:57 AM |
#17 |
| -
Not true. The Republicans are scared and are in Democrat attack mode. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 12:12 PM |
#28 |
| -
I mean...come on guys! |
jackbourassa |
Jan-19-06 10:34 PM |
#113 |
| -
For a person who's supposed to be down and out the Republicans and these |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 10:38 PM |
#115 |
| -
Alright, he has the support |
jackbourassa |
Jan-20-06 10:48 AM |
#130 |
| -
As much as Sen. Clinton's high numbers are. Here are polls. |
ProSense |
Jan-20-06 11:11 AM |
#131 |
| -
I disagree here, too. Gore has the perfect built in campaign slogan. |
renie408 |
Jan-19-06 12:23 PM |
#36 |
| -
ECONOMY is icky...you have to go back 30 years since DJI were down 5 years |
Sparkman |
Jan-20-06 11:24 AM |
#132 |
| -
I have been looking into it. I keep thinking we would be better off |
renie408 |
Jan-20-06 11:58 AM |
#134 |
| -
The most famous American silver/gold horder, not Hunts, but Jack Binion |
Sparkman |
Jan-20-06 01:32 PM |
#137 |
| -
And which democrat will they not attack? |
FreedomAngel82 |
Jan-19-06 01:55 PM |
#50 |
| -
Who is immune from media swiftboating? Clinton was impeached, Gore is |
blm |
Jan-19-06 11:51 AM |
#13 |
| -
A Republican |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 11:55 AM |
#16 |
| -
Except the charges are OLD and DEBUNKED by now. The swift-type charges are |
blm |
Jan-19-06 12:00 PM |
#19 |
| -
I respectfully disagree |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 12:03 PM |
#21 |
| -
But people do move past what they perceive as old news - and I doubt that |
blm |
Jan-19-06 12:08 PM |
#24 |
| -
Hey, that's a good point |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 12:12 PM |
#26 |
| -
DNC will hopefully expose the machines in a way that MacAuliffe |
blm |
Jan-19-06 12:45 PM |
#40 |
| -
Says who? You? Don't mind me if I don't listen to your bad advise. |
second edition |
Jan-19-06 12:10 PM |
#25 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jan-19-06 01:54 PM |
#49 |
| -
So I guess the answer is "no" |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 10:57 PM |
#120 |
| -
He can win in 2008 because he did win in 2004. |
abbiehoff |
Jan-19-06 03:26 PM |
#81 |
| -
oh please |
Snivi Yllom |
Jan-19-06 04:42 PM |
#93 |
| -
Ahem. |
LittleClarkie |
Jan-19-06 04:14 PM |
#89 |
| -
If he's on the ticket I'll vote for him |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 04:25 PM |
#91 |
| -
I'll deal with that when I get there |
LittleClarkie |
Jan-19-06 04:27 PM |
#92 |
| -
Could be. Offer us an alternative then. n/t |
Dr Fate |
Jan-19-06 10:05 PM |
#108 |
| -
Swift Boaters have been firmly debunked... |
zulchzulu |
Jan-19-06 10:26 PM |
#111 |
| -
Sounds like Dem powers want Kerry silenced exactly as during BCCI. |
blm |
Jan-19-06 11:43 AM |
#6 |
| -
No surprise there - probably the same ones who wanted him silenced |
Mass |
Jan-19-06 11:51 AM |
#12 |
| -
In light of current events |
Capn Sunshine |
Jan-19-06 11:53 AM |
#14 |
| -
I got into the internet posting through the Gore 2004 website. |
cindyw |
Jan-19-06 09:57 PM |
#104 |
| -
This points out two major problems people in the media and Kerry's Aides |
radio4progressives |
Jan-19-06 11:45 AM |
#8 |
| -
He ran a better campaign than media would show. That's why he won . |
blm |
Jan-19-06 11:47 AM |
#9 |
| -
to be fair, C-Span covered the campaign without the right wing punditry |
radio4progressives |
Jan-19-06 12:32 PM |
#38 |
| -
Kerry won the debates DECISIVELY. And the DU research forum proves the |
blm |
Jan-19-06 01:01 PM |
#42 |
| -
Total Agreement see post #65 and # 66 |
radio4progressives |
Jan-19-06 02:36 PM |
#62 |
| -
But how many people watch CSPAN - I loved its coverage |
karynnj |
Jan-19-06 10:31 PM |
#112 |
| -
48.3%, 48.3%, 49.2%, 43% |
sandnsea |
Jan-19-06 01:15 PM |
#44 |
| -
I think your numbers are wrong. |
jackbourassa |
Jan-19-06 10:36 PM |
#114 |
| -
You posted the same numbers |
sandnsea |
Jan-20-06 11:54 AM |
#133 |
| -
they don't discuss election fraud for a reason |
Snivi Yllom |
Jan-19-06 04:51 PM |
#95 |
| -
Lloyd Grove - F* him. This is a non story!!! |
Mass |
Jan-19-06 11:50 AM |
#11 |
| -
You mean that Crowley found Democrats ready to badmouth other Democrats |
Mass |
Jan-19-06 11:57 AM |
#18 |
| -
More circlular firing squads by a bunch of people with no difficulties. |
cindyw |
Jan-19-06 09:59 PM |
#105 |
| -
Yet another attempt to cut fundraising. |
TayTay |
Jan-19-06 12:03 PM |
#20 |
| -
The Republicans don't want Kerry to run. This is a right wing paper. |
second edition |
Jan-19-06 12:06 PM |
#22 |
| -
GQ is hardly right wing. NYDN is middle — New York Post is the right-wing |
NYCGirl |
Jan-19-06 12:12 PM |
#27 |
| -
Disagree, on the paper. I didn't mean to imply that GQ was RW, |
second edition |
Jan-19-06 12:19 PM |
#34 |
| -
I'm thinking that it really is old Dem powerstructure talking. They never |
blm |
Jan-19-06 12:24 PM |
#37 |
| -
This GQ article was linked, mentioned in the snarky ABC's The Note today |
flpoljunkie |
Jan-19-06 04:49 PM |
#94 |
| -
Exactly |
FreedomAngel82 |
Jan-19-06 01:58 PM |
#51 |
| -
"Wade responded hairily"...What does that MEAN? |
renie408 |
Jan-19-06 12:13 PM |
#29 |
| -
Exactly! I did a double take on "responded hirsutely." |
DemBones DemBones |
Jan-19-06 11:45 PM |
#125 |
| -
You know it's inevitable, you can always count on these posts |
second edition |
Jan-19-06 12:14 PM |
#30 |
| -
You're right. I just thought it was an interesting report/exchange -- |
DeepModem Mom |
Jan-19-06 12:17 PM |
#33 |
| -
I understand. n/t |
second edition |
Jan-19-06 12:21 PM |
#35 |
| -
I worked for the Kerry campaign in the DC HQ... |
displacedtexan |
Jan-19-06 12:17 PM |
#32 |
| -
Exactly! |
kerrygoddess |
Jan-19-06 01:02 PM |
#43 |
| -
Perhaps you should withhold final judgement until you read the story. NT |
NYCGirl |
Jan-19-06 01:16 PM |
#45 |
| -
perhaps you should too... |
kerrygoddess |
Jan-19-06 02:04 PM |
#52 |
| -
I haven't read it (and neither have you). I've only read what was posted |
NYCGirl |
Jan-19-06 02:16 PM |
#55 |
| -
I tend to believe that forces within the party don't want Kerry in just as |
blm |
Jan-19-06 01:20 PM |
#46 |
| -
That's nice to hear. |
jenndar |
Jan-19-06 01:47 PM |
#47 |
| -
Great post, because since we at DU seek the truth, you would |
tinfoilinfor2005 |
Jan-19-06 10:46 PM |
#118 |
| -
Expected timing on smear for comments by Clinton, Gore and Kerry |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 12:33 PM |
#39 |
| -
I think you are reaching. |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 02:08 PM |
#53 |
| -
Reaching? The post was about smearing Democrats. Entitlement? n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 02:21 PM |
#56 |
| -
It was reporting gossip |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 02:58 PM |
#64 |
| -
News reports are gossip? n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 03:19 PM |
#75 |
| -
That report is gossip. |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 03:21 PM |
#76 |
| -
My post referred to news. The gossip was about an actual article. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 03:25 PM |
#80 |
| -
The actual article is also about Gossip. |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 03:27 PM |
#82 |
| -
So then it's not credible. So why write Kerry off based on it? n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 03:32 PM |
#84 |
| -
I didn't need to read this article to write off Kerry |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 10:52 PM |
#119 |
| -
Support another candidate. We'll see n/t. |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 11:00 PM |
#121 |
| -
I do. |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 11:02 PM |
#122 |
| -
Good for you! n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 11:03 PM |
#123 |
| -
Another thing, support who you want, Kerry is the one to catch. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 02:22 PM |
#58 |
| -
The one to catch? |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 02:59 PM |
#66 |
| -
We'll see. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 03:14 PM |
#73 |
| -
Cat fight! Love it. |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 01:52 PM |
#48 |
| -
Sometime mid last year |
FreedomAngel82 |
Jan-19-06 02:12 PM |
#54 |
| -
Presumably you mean 2004 |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 02:21 PM |
#57 |
| -
You really want to believe this, don't you. |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 02:30 PM |
#59 |
| -
I'd take any Democrat over Bush, but I'd prefer one who's electable in '08 |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 02:55 PM |
#63 |
| -
Are you saying that 100% of Dems can't win? Don't see it that way. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 03:01 PM |
#69 |
| -
I'm not sure I understand you |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 03:04 PM |
#72 |
| -
Voters other than Democrats voted and will voted for Kerry. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 03:21 PM |
#78 |
| -
Enough? Do you know that for sure? How? |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 03:23 PM |
#79 |
| -
Do you know for sure? I do know he broke the Dem record for votes. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 03:28 PM |
#83 |
| -
I'm not convinced that it was on the strength of his candidacy |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 04:23 PM |
#90 |
| -
Good RW impersonation. So you connected w/Bush in the real debates? n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 05:18 PM |
#96 |
| -
Say, that's a funny one! |
Orrex |
Jan-19-06 09:00 PM |
#99 |
| -
RW TP. If you dont have that impression, why push it off on others? n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 09:14 PM |
#100 |
| -
Look |
Orrex |
Jan-20-06 08:10 AM |
#127 |
| -
You don't like Kerry's statements, but you also hate sound bites? n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-20-06 08:40 AM |
#128 |
| -
(nt) |
Orrex |
Jan-20-06 08:47 AM |
#129 |
| -
What? |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 03:03 PM |
#71 |
| -
You can't know that 9/10 were ABB? Where do you get your information? n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 03:17 PM |
#74 |
| -
I voted for Kerry because he was the strong and most knowledgeable |
wisteria |
Jan-19-06 03:00 PM |
#67 |
| -
Actually 2005 is the correct year! he had slighrly more in 2004. n/t |
wisteria |
Jan-19-06 03:02 PM |
#70 |
| -
That doesnt' tell you |
iconoclastNYC |
Jan-19-06 03:01 PM |
#68 |
| -
I think the most important point of concern this article reveals is that |
radio4progressives |
Jan-19-06 02:34 PM |
#60 |
| -
Media is the PR Dept of the fascist agenda. |
blm |
Jan-19-06 02:59 PM |
#65 |
| -
Eggsactly ... I watched all of that unfold right in front of my eyeballs |
radio4progressives |
Jan-19-06 03:52 PM |
#86 |
| -
The Fascists Corporate Media is the ENEMY of the Democratic Party. |
radio4progressives |
Jan-19-06 02:35 PM |
#61 |
| -
I suspect you might be correct |
LittleClarkie |
Jan-19-06 07:45 PM |
#97 |
| -
John Kerry is running again... |
KerryReallyWon |
Jan-19-06 03:21 PM |
#77 |
| -
well, we always knew that right? and that might explain why Gore was |
radio4progressives |
Jan-19-06 03:56 PM |
#87 |
| -
I don't think Gore was dissed by Reid. |
ProSense |
Jan-19-06 03:59 PM |
#88 |
| -
Not a fan, I take it. I remember when that Kerry campaign movie came out |
LittleClarkie |
Jan-19-06 03:51 PM |
#85 |
| -
Hirsutely? |
AnnieBW |
Jan-19-06 09:26 PM |
#101 |
| -
I like that. |
TayTay |
Jan-19-06 09:40 PM |
#102 |
| -
In the face of lossing our Democracy, Dems choose to argue over Kerry? |
cindyw |
Jan-19-06 09:52 PM |
#103 |
| -
Holy shit. You go girl. |
LittleClarkie |
Jan-19-06 10:02 PM |
#106 |
| -
Well stated |
rockymountaindem |
Jan-19-06 10:13 PM |
#109 |
| -
Four excellent points |
Inuca |
Jan-20-06 08:09 AM |
#126 |
| -
I'm not a huge Kerry defender at all- and I call B.S. |
Dr Fate |
Jan-19-06 10:04 PM |
#107 |
| -
Indeed. It's just so... anonymous and all |
LittleClarkie |
Jan-19-06 10:39 PM |
#116 |
| -
I agree with Wade...GQ is for pickin' ties...not picking World leaders... |
zulchzulu |
Jan-19-06 10:21 PM |
#110 |
| -
Smart response from the Kerry flack. GQ is very good. |
Bleachers7 |
Jan-19-06 10:41 PM |
#117 |
| -
kerry must be hitting some nerves, this GQ piece is junk and comes |
wisteria |
Jan-19-06 11:29 PM |
#124 |
| -
The entire article referenced is here: |
NYCGirl |
Jan-20-06 12:00 PM |
#135 |
| -
So what, one jackass has it in for Kerry and does a smear piece |
second edition |
Jan-20-06 01:02 PM |
#136 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread