Which is why they are not supposed to be judging that the death penalty is the proper sentence. Do you not even see the dichotomy of your own words? You are saying that they are not judge and jury while advocating that they should, in fact, take matters into their own hands. In addition, they would only know what he was arrested for if they knew for sure who he was. Did they establish that first? Or did they only find out who he was after they shot him and got identification on him?
No one is saying they should have done nothing. But they could have subdued him in other ways than to kill him.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
