I'll tell you what is wrong, the hoards of Pitt loyalists that decided to ride his LAME whine piece as justification to attack Howard Dean and/or his supporters. Words like tyrant being bantied about by some "sensible" Democrats against those that they don't agree with.
Do you really think that it was necessary for Pitt to identify this "alleged" DUer as a Dean supporter? What purpose did it serve other than to insure more devisiveness on DU? He got his message out and it wasn't just that he had been "attacked" by a DUer to his boss, it was that A DEAN SUPPORTER did it. Those dastardly devils in the Democratic party.
Pitt made the decision to post on this board under his real name. He happily used the influence that this gave him to try to sway the opinions of many activists on DU. He'll have to accept the respercussions that come when any journalist shows a bias. And no, that doesn't just apply to their published works.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
