You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #106: Resolution in Support of Election Reform (Adopted by DNC) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
106. Resolution in Support of Election Reform (Adopted by DNC)
The following resolution was adopted by the DNC Resolutions Committee at its meeting
on December 1, 2005, in conjunction with the meetings of the Democratic National Committee,
December 1-3, 2005.

Submitted by: Donna L. Brazile, At Large/District of Columbia
Hartina Flournoy, At-Large/District of Columbia
Ben Johnson, At Large/District of Columbia
Inola Henry, california
Leon Lynch, At Large/Pennsylvania
Betty McElderry, Oklahoma
Doug Palmer, National Conference of Mayors/New Jersey
Gregory Pecoraro, Maryland

Resolution in Support of Election Reform

WHEREAS, in June, 2005, the Democratic National Committee completed its exhaustive
review of the presidential campaign in Ohio; and

WHEREAS, the resulting report, “Democracy at Risk: The 2004 Election in Ohio” documents
that more than one quarter of Ohio voters reported problems with their voting experience, and
African Americans were more than two times as likely as white voters to claim they encountered
problems with their voting experience; and

WHEREAS, this report confirms evidence of widespread voter confusion; voter suppression;
negligence and incompetence on the part of election officials; long lines at the polls; improper
requests for voter identification, particularly among young voters and African American voters;
the failure to properly process absentee ballots and the improper use of provisional ballots in
Ohio on Election Day 2004; and

WHEREAS, evaluations of the administrative processes and technology used by election
officials in Ohio revealed that inadequate and insecure voting systems were pervasive
throughout Ohio—unreliable punch card systems and insecure, unverifiable direct record
electronic (DRE) machines; and

WHEREAS, 71 percent of white voters in Ohio were very confident their vote was counted but
only 19 percent of African American voters were confident their votes were counted; and

WHEREAS, the right to vote and to have that vote accurately counted is the bedrock on which
our democracy stands and nothing is more fundamental to our freedom than our confidence in
the integrity of our democratic institutions; and

WHEREAS, “Democracy at Risk: The 2004 Election in Ohio” makes recommendations for
future action by parties, legislators and local election officials to improve future elections;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) will
continue to work with Members of Congress, lawmakers in all 50 United States, the District of
Columbia, and all U.S. Territories, local election officials, and community leaders to update and
reform our election laws to ensure that voter confidence in our election system is restored and
maintained;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC “Democracy at Risk: The 2004 Election in
Ohio” recommends several actions; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommends states, the District of Columbia
and all U. S. Territories codify into law all required election practices, including requirements for
the adequate training of official poll workers; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommend lawmakers adopt uniform and clear
published standards for the distribution of voting equipment and the assignment of official poll
workers among precincts, to ensure adequate and nondiscriminatory access, and that these
procedures be based on set ratios of numbers of machines and poll workers per number of voters
expected to turn out, and should be made available for pub lic comment before being adopted;
and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommends lawmakers adopt legislation to
make clear and uniform the rules on voter registration; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommends lawmakers and local election
officials adopt clear and uniform rules on the use of, and the counting of, provisional ballots, and
distribute them for public comment well in advance of each Election Day, and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommends touch screen (DRE) machines not
be used until a reliable voter verifiable audit feature can be uniformly incorporated into these
systems and that in the event of a recount, the paper or other auditable record should be
considered the official record; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommends remaining punch card systems
should be discontinued; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommends lawmakers make it easier for
college students to vote in the jurisdiction in which their school is located; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommends lawmakers develop procedures to
ensure that voting is facilitated, without compromising security or privacy, for all eligible voters
living overseas; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommends lawmakers make voter suppression
a criminal offense in all states, the District of Columbia and all U.S. Territories; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DNC recommends lawmakers and election officials
should improve the training of poll workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Open Letter to Howard Dean, Re: "Election Fraud" reprehensor  Dec-04-05 09:44 AM   #0 
  - r'd.  Al-CIAda   Dec-04-05 09:49 AM   #1 
  - I just think it'd be easier, faster, and have a MUCH larger response...  zann725   Dec-04-05 09:59 AM   #2 
  - I can't thank you enough for posting this  sasha031   Dec-04-05 10:15 AM   #3 
     - Didn't the Dem's' call Dean in for a little talk some time ago?  sasha031   Dec-04-05 10:29 AM   #5 
  - An excellent post that spoke from my heart! Kicked, copied and sent! n/t  Talismom   Dec-04-05 10:25 AM   #4 
  - Shilling for a Green Party candidate on Democratic Underground?  MH1   Dec-04-05 10:30 AM   #6 
  - Hmmmmmmmm, he's running as an independent.  sfexpat2000   Dec-04-05 10:42 AM   #10 
  - FITRAKIS IS RUNNING AS A *GREEN* , according to his website.  MH1   Dec-04-05 10:59 AM   #12 
     - He's running as a Green? Great! Now I have one more reason  sfexpat2000   Dec-04-05 11:04 AM   #14 
        - Myself,,, I am voting Green over ANY DLCer  wakeme2008   Dec-04-05 11:10 AM   #16 
        - Even if it takes votes from the Dem (prob'ly Strickland) and throws the  MH1   Dec-04-05 11:14 AM   #17 
  - democracy = choosing the one you want regardless of afiliation nt  msongs   Dec-04-05 10:54 AM   #11 
  - Democratic = Democratic Party according to DU Rules  MH1   Dec-04-05 11:04 AM   #15 
  - Democratic principles should take precedence over arbitrary affiliations  NoFederales   Dec-04-05 08:01 PM   #54 
     - Bravo, well said. Vote only for Democrats that support Democratic  rhett o rick   Dec-04-05 11:52 PM   #90 
  - Better America=When dems are in power,Worse America=When reps are in power  skipos   Dec-04-05 12:01 PM   #26 
     - So you'd support Zell Miller ?? nt  rhett o rick   Dec-04-05 11:54 PM   #91 
        - Why not ask "If Hitler came back from the dead and ran as a dem"  skipos   Dec-05-05 07:26 AM   #99 
           - Zell Miller is an extreme example  rhett o rick   Dec-05-05 10:54 AM   #100 
              - I hear ya on the Clinton thing.  skipos   Dec-05-05 06:30 PM   #105 
  - Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm  RagingInMiami   Dec-04-05 12:19 PM   #28 
     - Please refer to this post:  MH1   Dec-04-05 12:48 PM   #30 
        - Please enlighten me about your rude awakening  RagingInMiami   Dec-04-05 12:52 PM   #31 
        - The OP is not asking for it.  fudge stripe cookays   Dec-04-05 01:17 PM   #32 
  - There is ONE cosponsor on Obama's bill: John Kerry  MH1   Dec-04-05 10:32 AM   #7 
  - Thank you for putting this together. GREAT! I'm going to fax a copy. Rec!  Beam Me Up   Dec-04-05 10:38 AM   #8 
  - You got it, Sheri. Well done! When you're done, mail him the thread.  sfexpat2000   Dec-04-05 10:40 AM   #9 
  - Kicked & fax sent!!!  sellitman   Dec-04-05 11:02 AM   #13 
  - That's right! Scream your head off about this!  Independent_Liberal   Dec-04-05 11:17 AM   #18 
  - OHIO folks: why not support Strickland???  MH1   Dec-04-05 11:18 AM   #19 
  - Yes, Strickland is a Democrat.  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 11:21 AM   #20 
  - Sheri, are you advocating taking support from the Democratic Party?  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 11:23 AM   #21 
  - If the Democratic Party leadership sells out to big business, then  rhett o rick   Dec-05-05 12:04 AM   #94 
  - Well said. The Dems really need to get on top of this issue.  glitch   Dec-04-05 11:27 AM   #22 
  - Done.  MuseRider   Dec-04-05 11:50 AM   #23 
  - Why was this resolution made fun of here at DU?  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 11:54 AM   #24 
  - I don't know.  skipos   Dec-04-05 12:02 PM   #27 
  - It's a very weak statement ...given that there are those of us involved  KoKo01   Dec-04-05 05:39 PM   #43 
  - Excellent, we must keep the election fraud issue alive! k/r  blue4barb   Dec-04-05 11:57 AM   #25 
  - Paper ballots NOW! Hand counts NOW!!!  In Truth We Trust   Dec-04-05 12:46 PM   #29 
  - Yes! And another petition in the same spirit:  Humor_In_Cuneiform   Dec-04-05 01:28 PM   #33 
  - Howard Dean was present for the BBV Demo of how a monkey was  Humor_In_Cuneiform   Dec-04-05 01:30 PM   #34 
  - Are you sure that he was present?  Freddie Stubbs   Dec-05-05 11:30 AM   #102 
     - Votergate the Movie  Humor_In_Cuneiform   Dec-08-05 12:38 AM   #110 
  - Done - and I'll spread the word as well. nt.  cyberpj   Dec-04-05 02:04 PM   #35 
  - Curious, does the green party have it's own message board to  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 02:18 PM   #36 
  - Besides Strickland, a democrat, who else is running in Ohio?  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 02:30 PM   #37 
  - A couple things...  reprehensor   Dec-04-05 04:05 PM   #38 
  - So you are saying withhold funds and give to a Green candidate?  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 04:26 PM   #40 
  - DON'T AGREE WITH RUSH-HOLT BILL  JohnWxy   Dec-04-05 04:25 PM   #39 
  - what if: helping Bob win on a Green ticket really help the Dems ...  kansasblue   Dec-04-05 05:09 PM   #41 
  - How?  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 05:17 PM   #42 
  - The Conyers Report: What Went Wrong in Ohio...  reprehensor   Dec-04-05 05:47 PM   #44 
  - You don't have to "play nice". You can have your own party.  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 06:12 PM   #45 
     - I'd rather see reform in the DNC gameplan, but thanks for the offer!  reprehensor   Dec-04-05 06:53 PM   #47 
        - But I refer to the letter.  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 07:02 PM   #48 
           - Kind of an Escher sketch, isn't it?  reprehensor   Dec-04-05 07:57 PM   #53 
              - It got my attention because it is unfairly targeting one person.  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 08:06 PM   #55 
  - Adding my KICK  election_2004   Dec-04-05 06:15 PM   #46 
  - Thanks!!!  nicknameless   Dec-04-05 07:07 PM   #49 
  - Dean HAS to address what HAS HAPPENED. Not just how he wants to  nicknameless   Dec-04-05 07:42 PM   #50 
  - It is his job to plan future campaigns. He is doing his job.  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 07:50 PM   #51 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-04-05 08:31 PM   #56 
        - "yappy dog posts" new one.  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 08:38 PM   #57 
        - "You obviously have absolutely NOTHING meaningful to say"  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 08:48 PM   #58 
        - Regardless of the fact that Dean is THE head of the DNC, you CONTINUOUSLY  nicknameless   Dec-04-05 08:57 PM   #61 
           - It is about 3rd party, you may just not realize it.  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 09:02 PM   #62 
              - The only thing that election fraud has to do with 3rd parties is the vote-  nicknameless   Dec-04-05 09:16 PM   #63 
                 - Careful, an agenda is surely underway, Dean is obviously ruffling  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 09:30 PM   #64 
                    - Unless Dean "takes down" election fraud, we can kiss the Democratic  nicknameless   Dec-04-05 09:38 PM   #68 
                    - Are you part of BBV, Bev's group?  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 09:41 PM   #70 
                    - My, my -- what a surprise! Another idiotic question!  nicknameless   Dec-04-05 09:51 PM   #72 
                       - Why are you doing this?  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 10:08 PM   #77 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-04-05 10:13 PM   #80 
                          - The entire point of the OP is that Dean isn't loudly addressing the issue  nicknameless   Dec-04-05 10:38 PM   #87 
                    - Unless Dean takes down election fraud? I didn't realize that Dean  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 10:06 PM   #76 
                       - Dean's refuses to address the issue of election fraud -- the #1 issue  nicknameless   Dec-04-05 10:24 PM   #85 
                          - Oh I see, and while one spends all his time on this one issue,  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 10:33 PM   #86 
                             - What do you think is the source of ALL issues facing us now? --  nicknameless   Dec-04-05 10:45 PM   #88 
                    - I much appreciate your posts today.  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 09:40 PM   #69 
                       - Your the only reason I logged on today and am risking the wrath  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 09:54 PM   #73 
                          - Not just Dean, but the party itself being denied donations.  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 10:10 PM   #78 
                             - I am not even a registered Dem nor would I ever become one simply  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 10:20 PM   #82 
        - "relentless" "pathetic" "yappy dog"  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 09:42 PM   #71 
        - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Dec-04-05 11:09 PM   #89 
  - I will join your effort ; seems no one gives a shit in Missouri so my $$$  NoFederales   Dec-04-05 07:54 PM   #52 
  - Are you a green party member?  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 09:31 PM   #65 
     - No.  NoFederales   Dec-04-05 09:34 PM   #67 
     - I don't see posters upset with Dean the DNC leader so much; frustration  NoFederales   Dec-04-05 09:54 PM   #74 
        - And as we all know, its so easy for Dean to be heard, I mean after  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 10:11 PM   #79 
        - It is not my intention to lure, or be lured, into provocative spins,  NoFederales   Dec-04-05 10:20 PM   #83 
           - Surely such words make sense only to the one spinning them..  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 10:24 PM   #84 
        - See, you are also withholding support just as we are getting started....  madfloridian   Dec-04-05 10:15 PM   #81 
           - Will you support the Democratic Party when they are controlled by  rhett o rick   Dec-05-05 12:01 AM   #93 
              - This is such a sad thread. You don't even know Dean's goal...  madfloridian   Dec-05-05 12:10 AM   #95 
                 - I support Dean. I am only saying that we shouldn't blindly support  rhett o rick   Dec-05-05 12:17 AM   #96 
  - KICK  faithnotgreed   Dec-04-05 08:55 PM   #59 
  - K&R- come on HJoward- kick some damn ass--- eom  FogerRox   Dec-04-05 08:57 PM   #60 
     - Perhaps if Dean had more loyal supporters he could kick anyone's ass..  AuntPatsy   Dec-04-05 09:33 PM   #66 
  - awesome letter  gristy   Dec-04-05 10:00 PM   #75 
  - I won't support any Democrat that isn't willing to FIGHT for  rhett o rick   Dec-04-05 11:57 PM   #92 
  - kick for democracy  rman   Dec-05-05 05:54 AM   #97 
  - None Dare Call it Stolen.  reprehensor   Dec-05-05 06:03 AM   #98 
  - I want my candidate in 2008 to stand up to the Swift Boaters,  rhett o rick   Dec-05-05 11:10 AM   #101 
  - Bob Fitrakis doesn't seem to like Democrats:  Freddie Stubbs   Dec-05-05 12:02 PM   #103 
  - He doesn;t like CORRUPTION, in any party or candidate. Has nothing  Amaryllis   Dec-06-05 06:13 PM   #108 
     - Then why doesn't he run as a Democrat and reform the party?  Freddie Stubbs   Dec-07-05 07:06 AM   #109 
  - Fitrakis: "DEMOCRATS SHOULD VOTE FOR TED STRICKLAND"  Aaaargh   Dec-05-05 12:41 PM   #104 
  - Resolution in Support of Election Reform (Adopted by DNC)  MaineDem   Dec-05-05 06:46 PM   #106 
     - Silly person, they don't want to see this.  madfloridian   Dec-05-05 07:02 PM   #107 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC