You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: You don't address the facts, Many of which took place publically such [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Trevelyan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. You don't address the facts, Many of which took place publically such
as Waco, NAFTA, draconian cuts in welfare and healthcare. I remember Clinton's mask dropping and sneering after the horrific houlocost at Waco "I'm sorry those people killed their children."

Hilary had several years to try to come up with another or a tweaked national healthcare plan but she did nothing. Why? Because the Bilderberg wanted and are still trying to make the US a third world country.

Think about what Kerry did on election night, he shut down his blog though there were desparate people like myself stunned by what was happening with the exit polls at 3am with a message that the moderators were tired, aside from a 45 minutes when despairing people were begging Kerry not to shut his blog down again and not to erase his months long blog, that he would be as bad as bush if he did, Kerry erased his months long blog and the comments from "election night" I saved some of them and have a site http://presidentkerrydeceptions.blogspot.com/ quoting some of the desparate comments and Kerry also removed anything critical of Bush that morning even before he conceded BEFORE the provisional and absentee ballots were even counted.

Why did Kerry do that?

I also have the article from the Village Voice which I guess you could call left-wing on my site dated Feb. 2004 when their was still time at the convention to elect a real Democratic candidate giving evidence that Kerry had his staff shred evidence that there were over a thousand POWs left in Vietnam. When a lawyer on his staff objected, Kerry said it wasn't hurting anyone, his staffer said it was hurting the POWs and their families.

Bush Senior wanted to use the funds for looking for POWs for drug trafficking and Ross Perot who was in charge has gone on record as saying he was threatened by bush, sr. when he tried to do his job both in the Skull and Bones article I mentioned and in a book called KISS THE BOYS GOOD-BYE by a journalist who was sick of the drug war fraud and quit a prestigious newspaper to write the story.

Why don't you address issues, many of which went on in plain sight, raised rather than insults like a FReeper?

Anyone who trusts Clinton and Kerry with all the information available is a bad as a Bushbot.
Another good site is http://www.StopTheLie.com about the PNAC and the left/right paradigm no longer holds.

Someone just commented on BlairWatch that Jack Straw is as bad as one of the Democrats being investigated in the Abramoff scandal is on the investigative subcommittee. Don't call me a right winger!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC