Reply #20: Why don't you produce some odds for us, or even some evidence.

[autorank]

Or even read the article and comment on it. The piece showed how there were identifiable problems with election integrity in Clermont before 2004, during 2004 and during the recount. The "humidity" was just an excuse.

If these people will call John Murtha a coward, they'll do about anything like: invade Iraq; despoil the environment at our great peril; neglect national disasters, i.e., Katrina; steal 2000 outright (no argument left there, i.e., "felon purge" in FL taking 50,000 blacks who should have voted (were not felons) OFF THE BALLOT.

The election stunk. Look at how well Hackett did in the first two rural counties listed below--which went 72% for the Republican 8 months previously.

Look how well he did in small precincts in Clermont. What do you think that's about?

The election stunk and Schmidt's attack on Murtha is a direct result of that election. People who deny election fraud on faith based or personal anecdotal excuses enable the election of the Jean Schmidt's of the world.