You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: how bout we get over the 2006 hump first? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. how bout we get over the 2006 hump first?
I know I know this is a sport for some but we need to get over that hump first, that is our price right now... 2006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Warner-Clark 2008? DeepModem Mom  Nov-10-05 10:13 AM   #0 
  - But is that enough?  Midlodemocrat   Nov-10-05 10:15 AM   #1 
  - I think they're good candidates for anywhere.  DeepModem Mom   Nov-10-05 10:21 AM   #4 
  - I agree. I live in VA and I think Mark Warner  Midlodemocrat   Nov-10-05 10:25 AM   #8 
     - I'm not an anti-Hillary person, like some here. I don't know...  DeepModem Mom   Nov-10-05 10:47 AM   #19 
        - I have always liked her.  Midlodemocrat   Nov-10-05 11:39 AM   #21 
           - Their worst nightmare -- Hillary in the WH. Yep, it would be fun! nt  DeepModem Mom   Nov-10-05 12:22 PM   #25 
              - Um, no, it wouldn't....  election_2004   Nov-11-05 05:55 PM   #56 
  - But who says that Virginia and Arkansas would be the only states  FrenchieCat   Nov-10-05 10:26 AM   #10 
     - I was stating, and the OP agreed, that I don't think we should  Midlodemocrat   Nov-10-05 10:30 AM   #14 
     - True!  DeepModem Mom   Nov-10-05 10:45 AM   #18 
  - Turn it around  Texas_Kat   Nov-10-05 10:17 AM   #2 
  - Yeah -- I worked for Clark in '04. I love him. There's just a lot of...  DeepModem Mom   Nov-10-05 10:22 AM   #6 
  - how bout we get over the 2006 hump first?  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-10-05 10:21 AM   #3 
  - I agree -- I was just sort of pipe-dreaming for the future. nt  DeepModem Mom   Nov-10-05 10:23 AM   #7 
  - I agree, but I don't think there is any harm  Midlodemocrat   Nov-10-05 10:26 AM   #9 
  - I like the way you think...  nickshepDEM   Nov-10-05 10:22 AM   #5 
  - I like Warner/Clark or Clark/Warner for 2008...  SteppingRazor   Nov-10-05 10:26 AM   #11 
  - Good point!  DeepModem Mom   Nov-10-05 10:28 AM   #12 
  - Clark's not middle-of-the-road, though.  Clark2008   Nov-11-05 10:18 AM   #47 
  - Warner/Clark is great, Clark/Warner is greater  phylla   Nov-10-05 10:29 AM   #13 
  - Clark -Warner makes much more sense. Here's why  Tom Rinaldo   Nov-10-05 10:32 AM   #15 
  - Good thinking, Tom. nt  DeepModem Mom   Nov-10-05 10:39 AM   #16 
  - I love your thinking. This makes perfect sense. n/t  Tatiana   Nov-10-05 11:52 AM   #22 
  - I like it.  Zynx   Nov-10-05 12:03 PM   #24 
  - I think that's flawed analysis  Awsi Dooger   Nov-10-05 09:19 PM   #31 
     - You say flawed but we see things differently  Tom Rinaldo   Nov-10-05 10:52 PM   #35 
        - Carter was a one term governor.  Zynx   Nov-11-05 10:07 AM   #43 
        - I trust you. I'll just stand corrected. Thanks n/t  Tom Rinaldo   Nov-11-05 10:13 AM   #44 
        - Carter had 8 years in state senate before elected gov n/t  Jai4WKC08   Nov-11-05 02:04 PM   #55 
        - If Warner doesn't run for Senate in '06  Jai4WKC08   Nov-11-05 01:56 PM   #53 
  - But in my opinion, that ticket should be turned around  FrenchieCat   Nov-10-05 10:45 AM   #17 
  - You make a good case. (I worked for Clark in '04.) nt  DeepModem Mom   Nov-10-05 10:49 AM   #20 
  - Clark/Warner would get my vote. In fact Clark/????? would too.  Auntie Bush   Nov-10-05 11:53 AM   #23 
  - Not both  kwolf68   Nov-10-05 12:36 PM   #26 
  - Yes to Wes.  Totally Committed   Nov-10-05 01:08 PM   #27 
  - Republicans control the state legislature with a veto-proof margain  Ignacio Upton   Nov-10-05 10:39 PM   #34 
     - Don't care. He didn't have to sign on with the DLC, and  Totally Committed   Nov-11-05 08:06 AM   #37 
        - Al From:Warner is one of "our candidates": Clinton, Vilsack, Warner & Bayh  flpoljunkie   Nov-11-05 08:13 AM   #40 
           - Thanks for the backup! eom  Totally Committed   Nov-11-05 11:05 AM   #49 
  - Got the order wrong IMO  AndreaCG   Nov-10-05 07:50 PM   #28 
  - Warner/Richardson is an invincible ticket in normal times  billbuckhead   Nov-10-05 08:26 PM   #29 
     - Yeah... invinceable.  Totally Committed   Nov-11-05 08:08 AM   #38 
  - Not interested in Warner in the least. nt  BullGooseLoony   Nov-10-05 08:27 PM   #30 
  - Yawn, one from column A and one from column B  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-10-05 10:26 PM   #32 
  - "Vision" is the key word.  BullGooseLoony   Nov-10-05 10:27 PM   #33 
     - BullGooseLoony...  Totally Committed   Nov-11-05 08:09 AM   #39 
  - I'm in!!!  Hyernel   Nov-10-05 11:21 PM   #36 
  - yawn- no its not- Conyers and Boxer makes tons more sense-- They are leade  FogerRox   Nov-11-05 09:45 AM   #41 
  - Do you think they would be able to win state like IA, OH, MO, and FL?  Zynx   Nov-11-05 10:18 AM   #46 
     - Not necessarily  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-11-05 11:57 AM   #50 
        - I wasn't refering to gender and race. I was refering to ideology.  Zynx   Nov-11-05 12:45 PM   #51 
           - According to your take on the situation,  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-11-05 01:32 PM   #52 
  - warner-biden  JABBS   Nov-11-05 09:52 AM   #42 
  - Ive actually been thinking about that ticket a lot lately.  nickshepDEM   Nov-11-05 11:03 AM   #48 
  - Flip it.  Clark2008   Nov-11-05 10:16 AM   #45 
  - I like it but electorally speaking would that give us the win?  DanCa   Nov-11-05 02:01 PM   #54 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC