Reply #19: Yes, let's address what's known

[sandnsea]

What's first known is that I wasn't talking about the invasion, I was talking about the vote. It's been a cute trick to distort the facts pertaining to both, to the point that some people say they knew the Niger document was faked so why did the Democrats vote for war.

"we invaded a sovereign country based on a pack of lies"

"we never believed the lies bush and cheney told and we saw thru Powell's lies at the U.N."

Of course you've stated you knew there were no WMD in Iraq, a cazillion times. Here are two statements in that regard. Don't pretend your haven't been harpingon "knowing" and that Democrats should have "known" what you did. Whether it's the WMD or an American President starting a war of choice. The only thing you knew is that you didn't like Bush.

Just like you "know" there "will NEVER be stability in Iraq while U.S. troops remain." You don't know that either, it's an opinion.

It's ideology. It's adherance to a polticial belief system that assumes the right is always wrong. Liking Presidents and adhering to ideology isn't what elected officials base the security of the country on. That's what Bush does.