Reply #82: I didn't ignore your question.

[Goldeneye]

I just thought your point was crap. There is no comparison between Hillary and the neocons. None. No democrat wanted to invade Iraq. Not one of them. Everyone who actively worked to get us into Iraq was a Neocon. The signatories of the PNAC? All neocons. The one's putting together bullshit evidence? Neocons. The ones awarding no-bid contracts? Neocons. The one's who ignored the rules of IWR and invaded Iraq? Neocons. The one's who kicked inspectors out of Iraq? Neocons.

Was Hillary involved in any of these things?

Now think about these questions: Do the neocons sign onto election reform legislation? Do they care about universal healthcare? Do they vote for minimum wage increases? Do they fight SS privatization? Do they vote against drilling in ANWR?

You throw all this crap together in one bundle and act like it means something. DLC doesn't mean Neocon. The DLC is a group of conservative democrats who are hawkish and who have a different idea for getting the democrats back in power. You can call them hawks if you want to, but don't call them neocons. There is no comparison. You can say they won't fix the problem because they are too conservative, but don't say it's because they are neocons, because they are NOT neocons.