Reply #66: Your point about 2006 is well taken, but

[Admiral Loinpresser]

a new politics is emerging. News cycles and political campaigns are now continuous. Cyberspace is now in the process of replacing TV as the dominant force in politics. We are seeing a populist debating process on this website which has never been possible in recorded history and I think it's a good thing. Activists will play a greater role in the nomination process, replacing the pre-TV "smoke-filled room" methodology and the TV-era money-raising methodology.

Dean has said we must run campaigns for four years and in 50 states and I agree. So we are fighting for the soul of the party and perhaps the people shall decide, finally.

That said, I look for potential candidates (and their organized supporters) to focus like a laser beam on 2006 races after Jan. 1. To do otherwise would not be pragmatic, because of the backlash criticism that would follow.

The real excitement of presidential politics will probably mean MORE activity for 2006 candidates, as boosters try to increase their own influence locally by volunteering for congressional candidates.

Excitement is a good thing if the energy can be channeled. I think it will be.