You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #51: Never underestimate a man's ability to underestimate a woman. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
51. Never underestimate a man's ability to underestimate a woman.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -What the Hell is SO WRONG with a WOMAN in the White House? opihimoimoi  Oct-04-05 05:22 PM   #0 
  - I hear you! n/t  TallahasseeGrannie   Oct-04-05 05:23 PM   #1 
  - You mean Hillary. Right?  Wilms   Oct-04-05 05:24 PM   #2 
  - They NEVER mean Boxer, do they? *sigh*  dicksteele   Oct-04-05 05:25 PM   #6 
  - No kidding... I'd support a Boxer ticket 100%  mikelewis   Oct-05-05 02:34 PM   #81 
  - I would mean someone with integrity, like  Skidmore   Oct-05-05 02:22 PM   #76 
  - Hey I have no beef with a woman in the WH  nadinbrzezinski   Oct-04-05 05:24 PM   #3 
  - I agree Clinton is too centrist...but I also dislike these legacy  formernaderite   Oct-04-05 10:19 PM   #55 
  - wouldn't it be great  sad_one   Oct-04-05 05:24 PM   #4 
  - Yep Boxer for president  nadinbrzezinski   Oct-04-05 05:26 PM   #7 
  - Well........  ewagner   Oct-04-05 05:25 PM   #5 
  - Depends on what woman  incapsulated   Oct-04-05 05:26 PM   #8 
  - Nothin. Don't listen to these fuckers. People are saying that they  xultar   Oct-04-05 05:27 PM   #9 
  - Margaret Thatcher wasn't all that in England.  GOPNotForMe   Oct-04-05 05:28 PM   #10 
  - Belief in the superiority of one gender is the definition of sexism  jpgray   Oct-04-05 05:28 PM   #11 
  - Obviously, you are correct....but in all fairness...we should give them an  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 05:36 PM   #16 
  - There's nothing wrong with a woman. Except she wouldn't get elected.  lindisfarne   Oct-04-05 05:28 PM   #12 
  - Yup nt  skipos   Oct-04-05 06:17 PM   #39 
  - We would all be too busy trashing her appearance and speculating  swag   Oct-04-05 05:30 PM   #13 
  - I wasn't talking about Hillary, but if she turned out to be the winner  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 05:33 PM   #14 
  - NO WOMAN CAN WIN AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME.  Totally Committed   Oct-04-05 05:35 PM   #15 
  - I don't know about that  incapsulated   Oct-04-05 05:38 PM   #20 
  - Its part of an evolutionary process towards bettering our Society  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 05:57 PM   #32 
  - No way do we have to live with it.  mcscajun   Oct-04-05 05:51 PM   #27 
  - I am really old now...  Totally Committed   Oct-04-05 06:02 PM   #33 
  - No, I can't tell you things have gotten better...only different.  mcscajun   Oct-04-05 06:21 PM   #42 
  - I am not sure I like Emily's List too much, they are not really  dorktv   Oct-05-05 02:34 PM   #82 
     - I wouldn't limit myself to EMILY's list either. I just threw that out as  mcscajun   Oct-05-05 05:06 PM   #98 
  - No, I don't accept that.  Andromeda   Oct-04-05 06:25 PM   #43 
  - Oh my  Nederland   Oct-04-05 05:37 PM   #17 
  - LOL, did ya notice???  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 05:38 PM   #19 
  - the bathroom off the oval office has 8 stand up urinals in a row ....  Botany   Oct-04-05 05:37 PM   #18 
  - Um....it Does? Really?  mcscajun   Oct-04-05 05:42 PM   #23 
  - honest  Botany   Oct-04-05 05:46 PM   #26 
     - Ha!  mcscajun   Oct-04-05 05:51 PM   #29 
  - Nothing a plumber can't rectify in a day or two....  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 06:25 PM   #44 
  - The Question was ...not if a woman can get elected, but if she could do it  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 05:40 PM   #21 
  - Of course a woman could!  Totally Committed   Oct-04-05 06:08 PM   #35 
     - If a woman can read, understand warnings...she be two steps ahead of BUSH  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 06:27 PM   #45 
  - Yeah! Go Barbara Boxer!  Crunchy Frog   Oct-04-05 05:40 PM   #22 
  - What's wrong with a Woman in the White House? Absolutely  mcscajun   Oct-04-05 05:45 PM   #24 
  - Not defending his job with Katrina,  Cloister   Oct-04-05 05:46 PM   #25 
  - No complaints except for misspent $30 million dollars which was given away  CottonBear   Oct-04-05 05:51 PM   #28 
  - While Brown wasn't there for Rita, his team was....sho nuff...  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 06:20 PM   #41 
  - It's a man's world...  caledesi   Oct-04-05 05:54 PM   #30 
  - Its all screwed up cause we got a GOOD SYSTEM but failed to put good fuel  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 06:17 PM   #38 
  - the problem is  Maine-ah   Oct-04-05 05:56 PM   #31 
  - WORM ran France too until the FishMonger wives stormed the Bastille  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 06:13 PM   #36 
  - nothing is wrong with it. I just don't want a woman that is a big ass  roguevalley   Oct-04-05 06:05 PM   #34 
  - That goes without saying...the filter would make sure we got a good one...  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 06:14 PM   #37 
  - But, but, women have, you know,...  Andromeda   Oct-04-05 06:20 PM   #40 
  - Well that is why the invented braids. Women can hide their hair.  dorktv   Oct-05-05 02:38 PM   #85 
  - Nothing! Which one do you think we can get in there?  Jim4Wes   Oct-04-05 06:27 PM   #46 
  - Right ideal, wrong time...................  mrcheerful   Oct-04-05 06:30 PM   #47 
  - We got plenty of Women out there on both sides of the aisle that wouild  opihimoimoi   Oct-04-05 07:25 PM   #48 
  - Women are fine......just not Hillary.  yourout   Oct-04-05 07:44 PM   #49 
  - Boxer would be fine by me  mmonk   Oct-04-05 07:57 PM   #50 
  - Never underestimate a man's ability to underestimate a woman.  DinahMoeHum   Oct-04-05 08:11 PM   #51 
  - LOL, I like that one  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 10:48 AM   #59 
  - Depends on the woman...  renie408   Oct-04-05 08:41 PM   #52 
  - I agree. Both are looking so much better than the Babbler.  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 10:51 AM   #60 
  - Boxer would be great, but we wouldn't attribute so much to gender  Muddy Waters Guitar   Oct-04-05 10:04 PM   #53 
  - Boxer looking good. ..History shows mixed reviews re women leaders  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 10:56 AM   #61 
  - Nothing is wrong with a woman in the White House  AntiCoup2K4   Oct-04-05 10:11 PM   #54 
  - Libby Dole? Kay Bailey Hutchison? Condi? Harriet?  zulchzulu   Oct-04-05 10:32 PM   #56 
  - Of course not,,,they have to go thru the process...the primaries  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 11:00 AM   #62 
  - Nothing, as long as it isn't Hillary . n/t  wisteria   Oct-04-05 10:49 PM   #57 
  - If Condi/Hutchinson/Hughes got the nom, I wouldn't vote for them too  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 11:06 AM   #64 
  - Look here Learn something from our current history  radio4progressives   Oct-05-05 12:54 AM   #58 
  - So Ann Coulter would make a perfect President just because she's female?  AlGore-08.com   Oct-05-05 11:03 AM   #63 
  - No one suggests we grab any woman off the street for the job  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 11:10 AM   #65 
  - Nothing, as long as the script, the acting, and the execution don't suck.  tasteblind   Oct-05-05 11:10 AM   #66 
  - Are we talking about the Status Quo??? LOL  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 12:21 PM   #68 
     - No, Commander-in-Chief.  tasteblind   Oct-05-05 12:29 PM   #70 
        - Bush sez he has a Philosophy....I wonder about that....what kind??  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 02:03 PM   #71 
  - As long as it's the right woman, nothing  enough already   Oct-05-05 11:49 AM   #67 
  - Someday, the search/filter will yeild a good one. A woman to lead us into  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 12:24 PM   #69 
  - A woman wouldn't....  snappyturtle   Oct-05-05 02:08 PM   #72 
  - I would guess...Only if provoked....  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 02:34 PM   #80 
  - In reality, nothing. To the good ol' boys currently in charge, everything.  Peake   Oct-05-05 02:12 PM   #73 
  - what evidence you have of gender determining behavior in politics?  jackthesprat   Oct-05-05 02:14 PM   #74 
  - ??? Who said that?  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 02:55 PM   #92 
     - if your thesis is the biological, gender basis of war making,  jackthesprat   Oct-05-05 02:59 PM   #94 
        - The vast majority of Aggression lies with MEN...not Women  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 04:57 PM   #96 
           - confusing the fact that men have had the power,  jackthesprat   Oct-06-05 12:31 PM   #101 
  - You mean like Margaret Thatcher? n/t  Dark   Oct-05-05 02:16 PM   #75 
  - No, Condi Rice!  FightinNewDem   Oct-05-05 02:27 PM   #78 
  - I never proposed we get a woman soley on her sex to lead the Nation  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 02:47 PM   #89 
  - Margret was many things to different peeps....they all have pressures from  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 02:37 PM   #84 
  - This post is sexist  paineinthearse   Oct-05-05 02:26 PM   #77 
  - Exactly... I agree...and what is more sexist than having the ole boy club  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 02:33 PM   #79 
     - clarence thomas  jackthesprat   Oct-05-05 02:36 PM   #83 
     - The filter broke down with partisan manuvering resulting in CT getting in  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 02:45 PM   #88 
        - terrible  jackthesprat   Oct-05-05 02:51 PM   #91 
     - Yes, but  paineinthearse   Oct-05-05 02:40 PM   #86 
        - Only if she convinces you during the primaries/filter....that she is the  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 02:43 PM   #87 
           - I don't need campaign rhetoric to influence me  paineinthearse   Oct-05-05 02:47 PM   #90 
              - Then you become part of the de facto filter at the poll, vote against her  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 02:57 PM   #93 
  - You mean like Laura Bush? Don't scoff, it's been done before at the  rhett o rick   Oct-05-05 03:00 PM   #95 
     - I don't think she could handle the job,,,she wouldn't make it past the  opihimoimoi   Oct-05-05 05:01 PM   #97 
        - She can't be any worse than Bushy. He is just a front anyway. nt  rhett o rick   Oct-05-05 10:50 PM   #99 
           - The Nation would scoff at her even trying...IMOH anyway  opihimoimoi   Oct-06-05 12:29 PM   #100 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC