Just Me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
| 34. Whew, brother,...what's up with AP? |
| -This quote about DSM really troubles me |
Catch22Dem |
Jun-19-05 08:53 AM |
#0 |
 -
I was just thinking the same thing as well. |
Nickster |
Jun-19-05 08:56 AM |
#1 |
  -
HE PHOTOCOPIED THEM AND RETURNED THE ORIGINALS |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-19-05 11:59 AM |
#33 |
| -
Whew, brother,...what's up with AP? |
Just Me |
Jun-19-05 12:12 PM |
#34 |
| -
The MINUTES are just icing on the yellowcake |
Karenina |
Jun-19-05 12:22 PM |
#35 |
| -
Oh good, I'm glad you brought that up, I haven't seen that |
Nickster |
Jun-19-05 04:43 PM |
#36 |
| -
Only If We Let Them |
abluelady |
Jun-19-05 08:57 AM |
#2 |
| -
I thought the same thing... |
terip64 |
Jun-19-05 08:59 AM |
#3 |
| -
Well the British didn't deny it and a top level official in US affirms it |
Maraya1969 |
Jun-19-05 08:59 AM |
#4 |
| -
They affirmed that the content seemed correct. |
igil |
Jun-19-05 10:45 AM |
#21 |
| -
Show me the originals of Bush's medical exams from 1972 and 1973 |
Vickers |
Jun-19-05 09:01 AM |
#5 |
| -
Sorry Charlie |
Last Lemming |
Jun-19-05 09:02 AM |
#6 |
| -
He might have meant the originals he got, not the ones in the |
FloridaPat |
Jun-19-05 09:03 AM |
#7 |
| -
Now that makes sense (n/t) |
Catch22Dem |
Jun-19-05 10:11 AM |
#18 |
| -
I read that earlier |
RUMPLEMINTZ |
Jun-19-05 09:06 AM |
#8 |
| -
If Dan Rather had done that... |
kentuck |
Jun-19-05 09:06 AM |
#9 |
| -
Perhaps, they were faxed or emailed and he had to destroy them,... |
Just Me |
Jun-19-05 09:13 AM |
#10 |
| -
Rawstory had an article about this - La la - are you here? |
FLDem5 |
Jun-19-05 09:17 AM |
#11 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-19-05 09:25 AM |
#12 |
| -
Why would they add any more credibility than Blair ADMITTING THEY ARE TRUE |
Karmakaze |
Jun-19-05 09:32 AM |
#13 |
| -
for reasons we can't understand |
FLDem5 |
Jun-19-05 09:34 AM |
#14 |
| -
I trust Conyers |
seemslikeadream |
Jun-19-05 09:44 AM |
#16 |
| -
I think you explained that correctly..I had seen that same description |
BleedingHeartPatriot |
Jun-19-05 09:41 AM |
#15 |
| -
The leaked documents were NOT leaked to take down bush.. |
Spazito |
Jun-19-05 09:45 AM |
#17 |
| -
If this was the cowed American press I would be worried |
indie_voter |
Jun-19-05 10:11 AM |
#19 |
| -
So how would they stand up in a court of law |
The Straight Story |
Jun-19-05 10:35 AM |
#20 |
| -
They probably wound't stand up very well. |
igil |
Jun-19-05 10:49 AM |
#23 |
| -
The originals still exist |
salin |
Jun-19-05 11:01 AM |
#24 |
| -
Not according to the quote in the original post |
The Straight Story |
Jun-19-05 11:09 AM |
#25 |
| -
The wording IS confusing |
indie_voter |
Jun-19-05 11:18 AM |
#28 |
| -
they were typed from verified photocopies I believe |
FLDem5 |
Jun-19-05 11:44 AM |
#29 |
| -
Yes and the source isn't the only person who has the minutes |
indie_voter |
Jun-19-05 11:48 AM |
#32 |
| -
Yes |
indie_voter |
Jun-19-05 11:11 AM |
#26 |
| -
Blair's office did not deny their authenticity |
Frederik |
Jun-19-05 10:46 AM |
#22 |
| -
If this is true, then there is no evidence. |
Pryderi |
Jun-19-05 11:11 AM |
#27 |
| -
Cool, so let's see them deny their authenticity. |
Goldmund |
Jun-19-05 11:45 AM |
#30 |
| -
Don't be troubled, they have been verified by... |
Spazito |
Jun-19-05 11:46 AM |
#31 |
| -
Unfortunately, |
FearofFutility |
Jun-19-05 04:56 PM |
#37 |
| -
I've barely been following the DSM saga |
brentspeak |
Jun-19-05 06:29 PM |
#38 |
| -
Destroyed because |
indie_voter |
Jun-19-05 06:35 PM |
#39 |
| -
So why not pass them off to someone else? |
brentspeak |
Jun-19-05 06:42 PM |
#40 |
| -
The Bush interview in 1999, |
agincourt |
Jun-19-05 06:53 PM |
#41 |
| -
If there was any way to suggest they were fake, it would be done by now |
four more wars |
Jun-19-05 07:01 PM |
#42 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
