You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #8: I read that earlier [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
RUMPLEMINTZ Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. I read that earlier
this morning. While it still can be used I think it's now worthless in any impeachment process. For a reporter to admit to destroying the original puts a big cloud over the whole thing. It's like someone just pulled the rug right our from under us. I'm not sure how effective the memo was going to be anyway without any direct quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -This quote about DSM really troubles me Catch22Dem  Jun-19-05 08:53 AM   #0 
  - I was just thinking the same thing as well.  Nickster   Jun-19-05 08:56 AM   #1 
     - Whew, brother,...what's up with AP?  Just Me   Jun-19-05 12:12 PM   #34 
     - The MINUTES are just icing on the yellowcake  Karenina   Jun-19-05 12:22 PM   #35 
     - Oh good, I'm glad you brought that up, I haven't seen that  Nickster   Jun-19-05 04:43 PM   #36 
  - Only If We Let Them  abluelady   Jun-19-05 08:57 AM   #2 
  - I thought the same thing...  terip64   Jun-19-05 08:59 AM   #3 
  - Well the British didn't deny it and a top level official in US affirms it  Maraya1969   Jun-19-05 08:59 AM   #4 
  - They affirmed that the content seemed correct.  igil   Jun-19-05 10:45 AM   #21 
  - Show me the originals of Bush's medical exams from 1972 and 1973  Vickers   Jun-19-05 09:01 AM   #5 
  - Sorry Charlie  Last Lemming   Jun-19-05 09:02 AM   #6 
  - He might have meant the originals he got, not the ones in the  FloridaPat   Jun-19-05 09:03 AM   #7 
  - Now that makes sense (n/t)  Catch22Dem   Jun-19-05 10:11 AM   #18 
  - I read that earlier  RUMPLEMINTZ   Jun-19-05 09:06 AM   #8 
  - If Dan Rather had done that...  kentuck   Jun-19-05 09:06 AM   #9 
  - Perhaps, they were faxed or emailed and he had to destroy them,...  Just Me   Jun-19-05 09:13 AM   #10 
  - Rawstory had an article about this - La la - are you here?  FLDem5   Jun-19-05 09:17 AM   #11 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-19-05 09:25 AM   #12 
  - Why would they add any more credibility than Blair ADMITTING THEY ARE TRUE  Karmakaze   Jun-19-05 09:32 AM   #13 
  - for reasons we can't understand  FLDem5   Jun-19-05 09:34 AM   #14 
  - I trust Conyers  seemslikeadream   Jun-19-05 09:44 AM   #16 
  - I think you explained that correctly..I had seen that same description  BleedingHeartPatriot   Jun-19-05 09:41 AM   #15 
  - The leaked documents were NOT leaked to take down bush..  Spazito   Jun-19-05 09:45 AM   #17 
  - If this was the cowed American press I would be worried  indie_voter   Jun-19-05 10:11 AM   #19 
  - So how would they stand up in a court of law  The Straight Story   Jun-19-05 10:35 AM   #20 
  - They probably wound't stand up very well.  igil   Jun-19-05 10:49 AM   #23 
  - The originals still exist  salin   Jun-19-05 11:01 AM   #24 
     - Not according to the quote in the original post  The Straight Story   Jun-19-05 11:09 AM   #25 
     - The wording IS confusing  indie_voter   Jun-19-05 11:18 AM   #28 
        - they were typed from verified photocopies I believe  FLDem5   Jun-19-05 11:44 AM   #29 
           - Yes and the source isn't the only person who has the minutes  indie_voter   Jun-19-05 11:48 AM   #32 
     - Yes  indie_voter   Jun-19-05 11:11 AM   #26 
  - Blair's office did not deny their authenticity  Frederik   Jun-19-05 10:46 AM   #22 
  - If this is true, then there is no evidence.  Pryderi   Jun-19-05 11:11 AM   #27 
  - Cool, so let's see them deny their authenticity.  Goldmund   Jun-19-05 11:45 AM   #30 
  - Don't be troubled, they have been verified by...  Spazito   Jun-19-05 11:46 AM   #31 
  - Unfortunately,  FearofFutility   Jun-19-05 04:56 PM   #37 
  - I've barely been following the DSM saga  brentspeak   Jun-19-05 06:29 PM   #38 
  - Destroyed because  indie_voter   Jun-19-05 06:35 PM   #39 
  - So why not pass them off to someone else?  brentspeak   Jun-19-05 06:42 PM   #40 
  - The Bush interview in 1999,  agincourt   Jun-19-05 06:53 PM   #41 
  - If there was any way to suggest they were fake, it would be done by now  four more wars   Jun-19-05 07:01 PM   #42 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC