You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #23: Michael Kinsley sucks [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
23. Michael Kinsley sucks
This is his opinion, not the Wahington Post's, unless I'm missing something. And who cares what he thinks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Downing Street Memo - No Smoking Gun according Wash. Post mikelewis  Jun-13-05 10:22 AM   #0 
  - spin, spin, spin all you want  ixion   Jun-13-05 10:26 AM   #1 
  - But the TRUTH must be supported  forgethell   Jun-13-05 10:34 AM   #8 
     - Continue to look for evidence? Naaaaaah!  gratuitous   Jun-13-05 10:44 AM   #9 
     - Exactly the point.  forgethell   Jun-13-05 11:28 AM   #21 
     - yellowcake: lie; aluminium tubes usage: lie; WMD capability: lie  ixion   Jun-13-05 11:05 AM   #18 
        - I don't know, but  forgethell   Jun-13-05 11:28 AM   #22 
  - this one person's opine!! editorial from yesterday.  rodeodance   Jun-13-05 10:27 AM   #2 
  - self delete.  mountainvue   Jun-13-05 10:45 AM   #10 
  - The writer is editorial and opinion editor of the Los Angeles Times.  katinmn   Jun-13-05 10:29 AM   #3 
  - here ya go WAPO  dweller   Jun-13-05 10:29 AM   #4 
  - Fuckin media whores shure have balls of brass. Got to give 'em that.  JohnyCanuck   Jun-13-05 10:30 AM   #5 
  - It has nothing to do with the left or the right, but the truth.  harrison   Jun-13-05 10:32 AM   #6 
  - That's all besides the point. I think we've been mistaken to label it...  Brotherjohn   Jun-13-05 10:33 AM   #7 
  - Exactly right.  wiggs   Jun-13-05 10:49 AM   #13 
  - Geez, I can't take the hypocrisy!  racaulk   Jun-13-05 10:46 AM   #11 
  - The fact that the intelligence was being fixed around...  mikelewis   Jun-13-05 10:48 AM   #12 
  - Bingo: it's an INTELLIGENCE memo--changing the subject to 'intentions'  Supersedeas   Jun-13-05 12:15 PM   #24 
  - (nevermind)  TahitiNut   Jun-13-05 10:50 AM   #14 
  - There is AN IMPORTANT SHRED of truth in this opinion piece:  Village Idiot   Jun-13-05 10:58 AM   #15 
  - I wonder if he wrote this before the 67 new memos were leaked?  cindyw   Jun-13-05 11:00 AM   #16 
  - okeydokey! Let's review...  Norquist Nemesis   Jun-13-05 11:01 AM   #17 
  - I think most of you aren't quite getting Kinsley (though he CAN be more...  Brotherjohn   Jun-13-05 11:16 AM   #19 
  - Kinsley is slightly tainted by having his head up *'s ass.  Roland99   Jun-13-05 11:25 AM   #20 
  - Michael Kinsley sucks  senseandsensibility   Jun-13-05 11:44 AM   #23 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC