You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: You implied that it was due to being a VP candidate n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. You implied that it was due to being a VP candidate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Isn't Bob Kerrey's image, like, way beyond repairing mouse7  Dec-22-03 03:02 PM   #0 
  - What is BOB Kerrey running for?  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 03:03 PM   #1 
  - He's trying to position himself for VP  mouse7   Dec-22-03 03:40 PM   #9 
     - Show me ONE credible story that anyone is promoting  HopeLives   Dec-22-03 04:32 PM   #15 
        - Google Bob Kerrey at Google News: 149 hits  mouse7   Dec-22-03 04:46 PM   #20 
           - Or you're about to be appointed to the 9/11 commission n/t  SahaleArm   Dec-22-03 04:48 PM   #21 
           - In other words, you made it up.  HopeLives   Dec-22-03 04:52 PM   #22 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-22-03 05:00 PM   #24 
           - You implied that it was due to being a VP candidate n/t  SahaleArm   Dec-22-03 05:03 PM   #26 
           - no kidding.  HopeLives   Dec-22-03 05:11 PM   #29 
              - Yeah... nobody discusses politics on blogs, right  mouse7   Dec-22-03 05:18 PM   #31 
           - Demonstrates poor reading skills, the writer was referring to Cleland  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:22 PM   #46 
              - Pot calling kettle black  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:35 PM   #54 
                 - No I do understand and you deliberately misled in your opening post  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:51 PM   #64 
                    - People don't "throw" their hat in the VP ring  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:58 PM   #69 
                       - Whatever  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 08:00 PM   #73 
                          - I report, you distort and pray.  mouse7   Dec-22-03 08:09 PM   #78 
                             - You have not proven your point . Better luck next time.  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 08:11 PM   #80 
                                - Merry Christmas :)  mouse7   Dec-22-03 08:15 PM   #82 
                                   - I'm Jewish  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 08:15 PM   #83 
                                      - Happy Hannakah! :)  mouse7   Dec-22-03 08:18 PM   #85 
           - Another link  mouse7   Dec-22-03 05:07 PM   #27 
           - A link which eliminates him as a choice?  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:21 PM   #45 
              - It's a poll which lists him as a potential match for Clark  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:34 PM   #53 
                 - WTF does NK of India have to do with this?  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:44 PM   #59 
                    - That's the homeland of the Sihks...  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:46 PM   #61 
                       - Oh I get it..you deliberately cloud the issues by pretending BOB KERREY  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:53 PM   #65 
                          - I have proof. Links are there.  mouse7   Dec-22-03 08:00 PM   #72 
                             - I made it clear in my first post on the thread that I knew the difference  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 08:03 PM   #75 
                                - Wait, don't go, hear more about Korea's Kims plus Andersens in Denmark.  oasis   Dec-22-03 08:10 PM   #79 
           - another  mouse7   Dec-22-03 05:14 PM   #30 
           - This is your evidence that Bob Kerrey is being considered for VP? ROFL  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:20 PM   #44 
           - another  mouse7   Dec-22-03 05:21 PM   #32 
              - nothing on this link demonstrates that BOB KERREY is being considered  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:24 PM   #47 
           - That's so untrue -  bitchkitty   Dec-22-03 08:21 PM   #87 
              - Evan Bayh got 129  mouse7   Dec-22-03 08:45 PM   #89 
  - What are you talking about. What is Bob Kerrey running for?  vi5   Dec-22-03 03:03 PM   #2 
  - Most number of hits on google based on his evidence presented  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 11:48 PM   #92 
     - You don't even know what Google news is, either  mouse7   Dec-23-03 12:08 AM   #94 
        - Give me a fucking break..another ad hominem attack?  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-23-03 01:34 AM   #96 
  - Ah, the informed ones  WilliamPitt   Dec-22-03 03:06 PM   #3 
  - Thanks for your nasty assumptions about fellow DU-ers... (n/t)  helleborient   Dec-22-03 04:17 PM   #12 
  - Yes...yes it is...  Sir_Shrek   Dec-22-03 03:08 PM   #4 
  - Thank God, it IS just you.  Kerryfan   Dec-22-03 03:10 PM   #5 
  - Baseless, whether referring to John Kerry  Rowdyboy   Dec-22-03 03:14 PM   #6 
  - Put up solely for flame bait. I searched your posts in LBN and it is clear  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 03:16 PM   #7 
  - Hey, if evidence has appeared to clear Bob Kerrey, do tell :)  mouse7   Dec-22-03 03:48 PM   #10 
     - Nothing demonstrates he's running for elective office so you have a bit  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:27 PM   #49 
  - It's seems a DUer's image may need a bit of repairing.  oasis   Dec-22-03 03:21 PM   #8 
  - I love this thread!  Devils Advocate NZ   Dec-22-03 04:15 PM   #11 
  - Typical Supporters of an unnamed candidate  sleipnir   Dec-22-03 04:23 PM   #13 
  - Hell yeah...  Devils Advocate NZ   Dec-22-03 04:36 PM   #18 
     - So are you suggesting Biden/Lugar which Dean supported was an ANTI-WAR  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:58 PM   #70 
  - Well, CNN flashed something about Bob Kerrey before quake  mouse7   Dec-22-03 04:34 PM   #16 
  - Don't tell me that you're fooled that easily.  HopeLives   Dec-22-03 04:34 PM   #17 
  - Fooled how?  Devils Advocate NZ   Dec-22-03 04:41 PM   #19 
  - Sorry if you can't figure it out.  HopeLives   Dec-22-03 05:02 PM   #25 
     - Maybe you can help me, too, as I can't figure it out  sleipnir   Dec-22-03 05:09 PM   #28 
     - We can figure out that you didn't know who Bob Kerrey was.  mouse7   Dec-22-03 05:24 PM   #33 
     - Sorry buddy, the only people that were fooled were your  HopeLives   Dec-22-03 09:25 PM   #90 
        - Yeah... you go on believing that.  mouse7   Dec-22-03 09:42 PM   #91 
     - I can't believe you did it! Hahahaha!  Devils Advocate NZ   Dec-22-03 06:20 PM   #36 
        - Thank God these people weren't around for JFK campaign  mouse7   Dec-22-03 06:40 PM   #39 
  - For an anti-John Kerry hit, I'd post Sun. Late Edition transcript  mouse7   Dec-22-03 04:54 PM   #23 
  - It was the part that mentions "running for elective office".  Old and In the Way   Dec-22-03 06:14 PM   #35 
  - Keeping BOB KERREY out of a VP slot is a BIG issue  mouse7   Dec-22-03 06:23 PM   #37 
     - No, you are just being disingenuous in your posts on this thread..  Old and In the Way   Dec-22-03 07:09 PM   #41 
        - Are Tiger Woods and James Woods the same person, too?  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:26 PM   #48 
  - When was BOB Kerrey formally accused of war crimes? Did I miss the case?  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:16 PM   #42 
  - Vice President is an national elective office  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:31 PM   #51 
     - YOu still have failed at demonstrating he is being considered by anyone  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:43 PM   #56 
        - You admit you cannot tell the difference between Bob and John  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:50 PM   #63 
           - No I never admitted that. You deliberately framed the post in an ambiguous  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:54 PM   #67 
  - Where is there any evidence that Bob Kerrey is running for anything  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 11:50 PM   #93 
     - Evidence that he is considered a possible candidate all over thread  mouse7   Dec-23-03 12:19 AM   #95 
  - Dooooooooooooooooooooooh!!  windansea   Dec-22-03 04:27 PM   #14 
  - when you have a selected president guilty of treason,  leetrisck   Dec-22-03 06:09 PM   #34 
  - Why are we discussing Bob Kerrey?  ibegurpard   Dec-22-03 06:37 PM   #38 
  - The whole Dean/Clark VP thing got VP talk started  mouse7   Dec-22-03 06:43 PM   #40 
     - PROVE IT  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:16 PM   #43 
        - Yeah... like I said, don't visit Korea  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:28 PM   #50 
           - Do you have ANY evidence as to the fact that BOB KERREY is in the running  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:34 PM   #52 
           - Do you know the difference between Tiger Woods and James Woods  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:43 PM   #58 
              - *best Regis impression* Is that your final answer?  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:46 PM   #60 
                 - The poll is and posts are there. That's proof  mouse7   Dec-22-03 07:54 PM   #66 
                    - Wow...still demonstrating poor reading skills since in my very first post  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:56 PM   #68 
                       - You're admitting you can't tell Bob and John apart, not me.  mouse7   Dec-22-03 08:03 PM   #74 
                          - I'd have to repeat myself as much as you to continue in this conversation  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 08:08 PM   #77 
           - If BOB KERREY ever runs for vp in Korea, be sure to let us know.  oasis   Dec-22-03 07:38 PM   #55 
  - Bob Kerrey admitted to participating in war crimes.  bandera   Dec-22-03 07:43 PM   #57 
  - He was also on the board of the Committee to Liberate Iraq but the thread  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 07:48 PM   #62 
     - So?  bandera   Dec-22-03 07:59 PM   #71 
        - My point exactly. I don't think you and I disagree.  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 08:07 PM   #76 
           - Link for poll to for Clark VP choices with Kerrey up there. Case closed.  mouse7   Dec-22-03 08:13 PM   #81 
           - Yes and in that link he was eliminated. Even gadfly bloggers disprove your  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 08:17 PM   #84 
           - You and I disagree only on the importance of it.  bandera   Dec-22-03 08:20 PM   #86 
              - We don't even disagree on that  nothingshocksmeanymore   Dec-22-03 08:35 PM   #88 
  - I am locking this....  Moderator   Dec-23-03 05:32 AM   #97 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC