You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #16: To be on the right side of the left but the left side of the right [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. To be on the right side of the left but the left side of the right
make one centrist. Your analysis cuts off the entire right side of the spectrum. To be the right wing of the Dem Party still puts you to the left of the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -How bad a screwing was the DLC compromise? Warren Stupidity  May-23-05 09:36 PM   #0 
  - You left off "We screwed the Republicans pretty good."  jobycom   May-23-05 09:41 PM   #1 
  - "Fristians" == "republicans"  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 09:42 PM   #2 
     - yeah, well  jobycom   May-23-05 09:43 PM   #3 
  - Don't know. Let's see what happens after these eight judges.  Massacure   May-23-05 09:45 PM   #4 
  - uh-oh what does it mean if "screw you ..." wins?  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 09:46 PM   #5 
  - I don't understand spinning this as a DLC deal  LittleClarkie   May-23-05 09:47 PM   #6 
  - Perhaps two of them were not DLC'ers  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 09:49 PM   #8 
     - oh and I worded the poll to be light-hearted  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 09:51 PM   #12 
     - To be on the right side of the left but the left side of the right  LittleClarkie   May-23-05 09:55 PM   #16 
        - The DLC is not centrist.  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 10:09 PM   #21 
           - Two questions: Does Clinton typify the DLC?  LittleClarkie   May-23-05 10:11 PM   #23 
              - lets see  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 10:55 PM   #33 
  - For the Dems,  mmonk   May-23-05 09:48 PM   #7 
  - The ones spinning this as a win the most  LittleClarkie   May-23-05 09:56 PM   #17 
  - It's too soon to tell.  FubarFly   May-23-05 09:50 PM   #9 
  - DLC? WTF?  TheBorealAvenger   May-23-05 09:51 PM   #10 
  - Joementum EOM  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 09:53 PM   #14 
  - Talk About Your Push-Polls /nt  demwing   May-23-05 09:51 PM   #11 
  - Political analysts at week's end are going to tab this one as a win for us  Old Crusoe   May-23-05 09:52 PM   #13 
  - I consider the appointment of three shitheads with more to follow  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 09:54 PM   #15 
     - What appointment?  LittleClarkie   May-23-05 09:57 PM   #18 
     - oh ok right sorry  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 10:00 PM   #19 
     - Do you seriously expect Rep. senators not to vote for them?  Mass   May-23-05 10:16 PM   #26 
        - I'm waiting to see  LittleClarkie   May-23-05 10:18 PM   #27 
           - There isn't a single instance of compassion, fairness or  pgh_dem   May-23-05 11:09 PM   #35 
     - They were shitheads prior to tonight's deal and we didn't have the votes -  Old Crusoe   May-23-05 10:01 PM   #20 
     - Theocratic poseur leaders like to tell their flock they are oppressed  TheBorealAvenger   May-23-05 10:13 PM   #24 
        - It is shameful, and you're right about that strategy. If I hear the --  Old Crusoe   May-23-05 10:42 PM   #29 
     - What was going to keep them from getting confirmed ANYWAYS?  davepc   May-24-05 03:06 AM   #39 
        - So explain to me what happens next time.  Zhade   May-24-05 06:20 AM   #42 
        - Sorry but I don't see it that way.  Warren Stupidity   May-24-05 06:21 AM   #43 
           - The republicans are not some monolithic bloc  davepc   May-24-05 08:52 AM   #45 
  - At best, we got Frist to take a step back  realpolitik   May-23-05 10:10 PM   #22 
  - Sorry but Byrd signed on that.  Mass   May-23-05 10:14 PM   #25 
  - Here's the list:  bvar22   May-23-05 10:54 PM   #32 
     - I do not disagree with you  Mass   May-24-05 06:11 AM   #41 
  - Extremists on both sides (note: that includes myself and you)  Chicago Democrat   May-23-05 10:25 PM   #28 
  - so if it ain't bad for frist  Warren Stupidity   May-23-05 10:58 PM   #34 
  - The Working Americans and poor got the royal screwing...  bvar22   May-23-05 10:48 PM   #30 
  - we were sold out  dajoki   May-23-05 10:50 PM   #31 
  - We need to dump Reid.  genius   May-24-05 12:45 AM   #36 
     - if we had public opinion on our side we could have done better  LuPeRcALiO   May-24-05 12:49 AM   #37 
     - Who would replace Reid?  Cynot   May-24-05 02:29 AM   #38 
        - he'd be replaced by conventional wisdom on the internet  foo_bar   May-24-05 03:27 AM   #40 
  - The usual screwing by the usual suspects.  CWebster   May-24-05 06:32 AM   #44 
  - I'm not entirely sure what to think yet.  Cynot   May-24-05 12:18 PM   #46 
  - When you can't know how bad you've been screwed, shouldn't ask!  zann725   May-24-05 12:29 PM   #47 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC