w4rma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-16-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. "Given the choice between a …" Republican and a Democrat who openly |
|
Edited on Sat Apr-16-05 01:39 PM by w4rma
supports unpopular Republican policy, people will vote for the real Republican all the time.
"Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time"
It means that folks do not, in general, support Republican policy. Republican policy is very unpopular. So when a Democrat tries to run on enacting that unpopular policy, the Democrat will lose. But when a Republican runs for office, the folks who want that policy enacted assume that the Republican will enact the policy and the Republican can spend time convincing the folks who will be harmed by the policy that there is nothing to be worried about.
As to vote fraud before 2000, there may have been some vote fraud before 2000 against Democrats, but considering that these black box voting machines didn't come into play until 2000, I don't think vote fraud was the problem *before 2000*. Although I do think that Shrub probably beat Ann Richards via some vote fraud.
|
| -Analysis: The Democratic Party's 1994 Congressional Losses |
spaniard |
Apr-16-05 01:05 PM |
#0 |
-
excellent analysis |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 01:17 PM |
#1 |
 -
rightwing? He's at the Center for American Progress - very liberal |
spaniard |
Apr-16-05 01:24 PM |
#2 |
-
because he said something that blew their theory |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 01:33 PM |
#3 |
-
"Given the choice between a …" Republican and a Democrat who openly |
w4rma |
Apr-16-05 01:35 PM |
#4 |
 -
well, actually, I don't think thats what Truman meant when he said it |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 01:40 PM |
#5 |
-
Republican policy is *any* policy that benefits the ultra-wealthy at the |
w4rma |
Apr-16-05 01:52 PM |
#6 |
-
ok, that's fair |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 01:58 PM |
#8 |
-
Yes, imho. |
w4rma |
Apr-16-05 02:07 PM |
#10 |
-
hmmm... good answer |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 02:11 PM |
#11 |
-
Thank you. (nt) |
w4rma |
Apr-16-05 02:15 PM |
#12 |
-
There are A LOT of factors that contributed to the losses in 1994 |
Hippo_Tron |
Apr-16-05 01:53 PM |
#7 |
 -
if only everyone could be as insightful as you! |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 01:59 PM |
#9 |
-
Part of it is that I intend to go into politics |
Hippo_Tron |
Apr-16-05 02:20 PM |
#14 |
-
well, take it from someone already in politics |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 02:35 PM |
#15 |
-
You're already in politics? What/where? |
loudsue |
Apr-16-05 05:26 PM |
#21 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Apr-16-05 02:18 PM |
#13 |
 -
hmmm... Mrs. "1950" Posts |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 02:41 PM |
#16 |
-
Guess if you make a small, in-jest violation the good mods will let you |
Cats Against Frist |
Apr-16-05 02:54 PM |
#17 |
-
The way we were taught, they descended from the Federalists |
Hippo_Tron |
Apr-16-05 04:15 PM |
#18 |
 -
I'm not sure where the contention is |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 04:52 PM |
#19 |
-
The key difference is that there were no corporations in the 1790's |
Hippo_Tron |
Apr-17-05 05:03 PM |
#24 |
-
the reference wasn't about corporations |
wyldwolf |
Apr-17-05 06:32 PM |
#25 |
-
Great post, Cats! |
loudsue |
Apr-16-05 05:22 PM |
#20 |
-
It was passionate, but... |
wyldwolf |
Apr-16-05 05:58 PM |
#22 |
-
Bravo! |
Writer |
Apr-16-05 08:13 PM |
#23 |
-
I don't think a move to the left will necessarily win more elections, |
agincourt |
Apr-17-05 06:47 PM |
#26 |
-
Interesting... |
Q |
Apr-17-05 08:06 PM |
#27 |
-
We lost for lots of reasons |
dsc |
Apr-17-05 10:27 PM |
#28 |