You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #30: resorting to ad hominems indicates a losing argument [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. resorting to ad hominems indicates a losing argument
Want to commiserate with your one admirer?

Appeals to popularity only reinforce the perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  - kick!  Al-CIAda   Mar-27-05 04:48 PM   #1 
  - kick :-)  papau   Mar-27-05 04:49 PM   #2 
  - Okay! So now what? Innaugurate Kerry?  osiristz   Mar-27-05 04:51 PM   #3 
  - FOX News? You must be kidding. How about Conyers instead?  TruthIsAll   Mar-28-05 10:13 AM   #6 
     - Conyers would inquire about your "credentials"  foo_bar   Mar-28-05 02:25 PM   #8 
        - Go ahead. Ad Hominem. No refutation. Just naysay. Welcome Back. Not.  TruthIsAll   Mar-28-05 04:14 PM   #10 
           - there's still time for another edit  foo_bar   Mar-28-05 05:09 PM   #11 
           - Enjoy that walk.Oh, and thanks for kicking my thread.  TruthIsAll   Mar-28-05 05:26 PM   #12 
              - kick for truth!  foo_bar   Mar-28-05 07:53 PM   #14 
           - "very credited universities"  foo_bar   Mar-28-05 08:12 PM   #15 
           - You have not responded to my challenge. 'Nuff said.  TruthIsAll   Mar-28-05 09:39 PM   #18 
              - the clinical term is "projection"  foo_bar   Mar-28-05 11:37 PM   #20 
                 - It's not time that you lack; you have plenty of time for pomposity.  TruthIsAll   Mar-29-05 01:06 AM   #22 
                    - denier: n. one who denies [Webster]  foo_bar   Mar-29-05 07:16 AM   #27 
                       - You got me there. I spelled it wrong. Ok, I guess that means  TruthIsAll   Mar-30-05 12:18 PM   #38 
           - Has Conyers been given this info?  Freddie Stubbs   Mar-28-05 09:56 PM   #19 
              - probably not for lack of trying  foo_bar   Mar-29-05 12:16 AM   #21 
              - You must really be hurting right now.  TruthIsAll   Mar-29-05 01:22 AM   #24 
                 - resorting to ad hominems indicates a losing argument  foo_bar   Mar-29-05 08:28 AM   #30 
              - Does anyone know if Conyers has been given this information?  Freddie Stubbs   Mar-29-05 07:13 AM   #26 
  - Kick and nominate  DELUSIONAL   Mar-27-05 05:20 PM   #4 
  - kick and nominate  FLDem5   Mar-27-05 05:21 PM   #5 
  - Thanks again, TIA. n/t  BlueIris   Mar-28-05 12:17 PM   #7 
  - Kick it for after work n/t  LilBitRad   Mar-28-05 02:45 PM   #9 
  - I thought this stuff  tritsofme   Mar-28-05 05:38 PM   #13 
  - If I kept it there, I would not have had the pleasure of your post.  TruthIsAll   Mar-29-05 01:12 AM   #23 
  - TIA, you flat out rock  leftofthedial   Mar-28-05 08:17 PM   #16 
  - All This Info Is Fantastic, But It Only Makes Me  ChiciB1   Mar-28-05 08:36 PM   #17 
  - I don't know how TIA's math skills can be questioned  Awsi Dooger   Mar-29-05 04:11 AM   #25 
  - Awsie, focus on how they voted in 2000 and new voters, not gender...  TruthIsAll   Mar-29-05 07:19 AM   #28 
  - first learn what "mathematical proof" means  foo_bar   Mar-29-05 10:15 AM   #32 
     - DO YOU AGREE THAT THE 43% BUSH/37% GORE VOTER TURNOUT IS IMPOSSIBLE?  TruthIsAll   Mar-29-05 11:18 AM   #33 
  - the "skills" aren't in question, just the academic credentials  foo_bar   Mar-29-05 08:11 AM   #29 
     - Still questioning my academic credentials? You are totally in denial.  TruthIsAll   Mar-29-05 11:33 AM   #34 
  - Does anyone know if Conyers has been given this information?  Freddie Stubbs   Mar-29-05 09:29 AM   #31 
  - Patience. patience.  TruthIsAll   Mar-30-05 12:24 PM   #39 
  - By the way, has anyone given this information to Conyers?  captain crunch   Mar-29-05 12:10 PM   #35 
  - Conyers got the links yesterday..  TruthIsAll   Mar-29-05 02:39 PM   #36 
     - I suppose that he will be having a press conference in a few days  Freddie Stubbs   Mar-30-05 11:13 AM   #37 
     - Ah, sarcasm. Do you dream about Conyers -or have nightmares about him?  TruthIsAll   Mar-30-05 12:26 PM   #40 
        - You don't think that Conyers will publicize this material?  Freddie Stubbs   Mar-30-05 12:43 PM   #42 
     - Three days and still no word from Conyers...  Freddie Stubbs   Mar-31-05 11:50 AM   #45 
  - Wow! I didn't know that TIA was still providing comic relief!  ArkDem   Mar-30-05 12:33 PM   #41 
     - My same thought exactly ArkDem  Yupster   Mar-30-05 01:46 PM   #43 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-30-05 04:08 PM   #44 
        - I gotta tell ya that is GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  ArkDem   Mar-31-05 12:05 PM   #46 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC