Reply #18: Funding the NRA is protected as free political speech

[slackmaster]

...for their funding of the NRA and the attempts to halt any sort of reasonable measures to stop all the murder?

That's your personal opinion. I believe the NRA would disagree. If you don't like what the NRA does you are free to speak out against them. You are also free to join them and become a voting member so that you have some input into the makeup of the NRA board of directors. But you cannot sue someone over a difference of political views.

You are saying that corporate cabals can do whatever they want in terms of affecting government policy and never, ever need to worry about security features and regulations?

Influencing public policy is protected political speech.

That is what you are saying - that people do not have a right 'shake things up a bit' 'have a paradigm shift' 'rebrand their fight for the poor'.

No, I said that nobody should be able to sue someone else for things that are beyond their control.

And who exactly decides what is a frivolous law-suit?

Generally judges throw them out, as they have just about every lawsuit brought against gun manufacturers.