Tactical Progressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-05 12:26 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-09-05 12:52 AM by Tactical Progressive
Gore has the name recognition and the following, and his Presidency was interrupted by a corrupt Supreme Court. He is owed, besides the fact that he is probably the best political candidate - at the very least one of the very best political candidates - that Democrats have.
General Wesley Clark I can't say enough good things about. He was my clear choice throughout the primaries from start to finish. Unfortunately he has no experience in elected office and not nearly the name recognition or political following that a long-time national figure like Gore has. The Vice-Presidency will give him that experience, which really does matter, and the exposure too. I have no doubt that under Gore he, like Gore under Clinton, would be a highly involved VP and not Quaylish window dressing. I look at VP seasoning as a positive consideration, not an obstacle. For fellow Clark fans, that means 16 years topside instead of just 8, assuming things work out, so not to fret.
I've been thinking about this since the election, and the more I think about it the better it sounds.
Btw, I'm also a huge Hillary fan and would love her as a candidate too if I think the times are right for that in three years.
|