99. I really don't think that the Justices would accept jurisdiction.
Edited on Sat Jan-29-05 10:22 AM by Pepperbelly
Particularly Darth Rhenquist's Court. I don't see any way that they would agree to hear the case. Not with the Bush v. Gore majority still sitting there. The Fortas precedent is not a legal precedent but a political one. And it would be far more valuable than as a demonstrator of hypocracy. It would be an unmistakable and undeniable instance of gop attempts to circumvent democratic safeguards against tyrany within the USA.
And that would be powerful stuff. And it would be true.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
