You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: No one. and in response to an earlier post, "regime change" is in fact IL [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. No one. and in response to an earlier post, "regime change" is in fact IL
>>"regime change" is in fact ILLEGAL.<<

Nothing shrubbie and his cohorts do is illegal, whether it is or not. They write the rules as they go. Perhaps some true democracies will decide we need a regime change at home. Now wouldn't that be interesting.

From the looks of things from the Air Force 2025 deal, we certainly don't appear to be thinking about being at peace with ANYONE in the next 100 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Speaking of bush's Iraq War Resolution...could some freeping idiot show LynnTheDem  Jan-12-05 04:40 AM   #0 
  - Magnetic bearings and some democracts are alike in one respect,  4MoronicYears   Jan-12-05 05:09 AM   #1 
  - But did ANYONE vote for "Invasion of Iraq to spread democracy"?  LynnTheDem   Jan-12-05 05:28 AM   #2 
     - I believe there was a previous resolution...  punpirate   Jan-12-05 06:04 AM   #3 
        - You mean CLINTON'S "Iraq Liberation Act".  LynnTheDem   Jan-12-05 06:18 AM   #4 
           - Clinton's ILA that also specifically says...  LynnTheDem   Jan-12-05 07:10 AM   #5 
           - I'm not arguing that...  punpirate   Jan-12-05 07:16 AM   #6 
              - I know (and agree) with you here but the only AUTHORITY given for WAR  LynnTheDem   Jan-12-05 12:44 PM   #11 
                 - No one. and in response to an earlier post, "regime change" is in fact IL  4MoronicYears   Jan-12-05 07:00 PM   #17 
  - Also, the IWR came with conditions.  wiggs   Jan-12-05 08:45 AM   #7 
  - The IWR would have PREVENTED war if it had been adhered to properly.  blm   Jan-12-05 09:01 AM   #8 
     - Voting for the IWR was not a vote for the Iraq war.  txaslftist   Jan-12-05 09:14 AM   #9 
     - It was literally an  darboy   Jan-12-05 01:30 PM   #13 
        - Whoaaa, pardner...  txaslftist   Jan-12-05 04:52 PM   #16 
           - I agree he deserves blame  darboy   Jan-12-05 09:08 PM   #19 
     - if thats true  darboy   Jan-12-05 01:29 PM   #12 
        - So you fell for Bush's headfake? Go ahead, let Bush off the hook. That's  blm   Jan-12-05 02:16 PM   #14 
           - you are the one claiming he violated it  darboy   Jan-12-05 09:06 PM   #18 
  - We have an outlaw regime  htuttle   Jan-12-05 10:07 AM   #10 
  - I just want DUers to remember one thing...  Zhade   Jan-12-05 03:01 PM   #15 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC