You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: We DO have hard evidence of nationwide voting "glithces & irregularites" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. We DO have hard evidence of nationwide voting "glithces & irregularites"
Yet no coordinated effort to even talk about investigating & reforming those problems either.

DEMS are too afraid(?) corrupt(?) to go on TV and make noise about investigating what is FACTUAL and known about voting "irregularites & glitches"- much less for talking about an investigation about what has not been loked into.

The BIG QUESTION is: "WHY???"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Are senators too afraid to contest the election because they don't know Nikepallas  Jan-01-05 05:47 PM   #0 
  - Their affraid of biting their own butts.  Cobalt Violet   Jan-01-05 05:49 PM   #1 
  - Holding office is more important than saving the country  IndianaGreen   Jan-01-05 09:58 PM   #45 
  - I haven't been convinced otherwise  jarab   Jan-01-05 05:53 PM   # 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-01-05 05:53 PM   #2 
  - Will take incredible balls.....  grumpy old fart   Jan-01-05 05:56 PM   #3 
  - Sounds like we need a Woman!  zann725   Jan-01-05 08:09 PM   #34 
  - Sen. Robert Byrd.  tblue37   Jan-02-05 02:50 AM   #55 
  - Retribution from * if it doesn't work  signmike   Jan-01-05 05:57 PM   #4 
  - The thing for me, and I think for a lot of Democrats, is that  BullGooseLoony   Jan-01-05 06:00 PM   #5 
  - No, that is not the reason. That is an excuse. Here is why...  Dr Fate   Jan-01-05 06:15 PM   #8 
  - I KNOW all that!  BullGooseLoony   Jan-01-05 06:37 PM   #13 
  - I hear you. I was making a larger point...  Dr Fate   Jan-01-05 06:43 PM   #17 
     - Well, that's true.  BullGooseLoony   Jan-01-05 06:46 PM   #18 
        - We DO have hard evidence of nationwide voting "glithces & irregularites"  Dr Fate   Jan-01-05 06:57 PM   #19 
           - WHY? Because we have evidence of "glitches & irregularities..."  IStriker   Jan-01-05 07:59 PM   #31 
              - Did any of the said glitches favor Kerry?  Dr Fate   Jan-01-05 08:23 PM   #36 
              - I'm sick of being the party of excuses.  Dr Fate   Jan-01-05 08:38 PM   #40 
              - Oh really?  magellan   Jan-02-05 01:14 AM   #54 
                 - All I'm saying is that in 2000, everybody was shocked...  IStriker   Jan-02-05 10:09 AM   #58 
                    - Did any of the "glitches & irregularities" favor Kerry?  Dr Fate   Jan-02-05 02:57 PM   #60 
                       - I don't want them to ask the question; I want them to answer it...  IStriker   Jan-03-05 11:26 AM   #63 
  - Amazing how they shrivel and shrink away from the "Liar" word  calimary   Jan-01-05 08:24 PM   #37 
     - It must be because they are liars too.  Dr Fate   Jan-01-05 08:28 PM   #38 
        - I think they're bought by corporate America  lulu in NC   Jan-01-05 08:38 PM   #41 
           - But they are losing their seats in every election...  Dr Fate   Jan-01-05 08:41 PM   #42 
  - BGL that is the whole point, to actually GET the evidence and see what  AZDemDist6   Jan-01-05 06:18 PM   #9 
  - And yet, without at least some  forgethell   Jan-01-05 06:38 PM   #14 
  - put it under the guise of the HAVA act. Oversight (to see how the  AZDemDist6   Jan-01-05 06:58 PM   #20 
  - And yet,  forgethell   Jan-01-05 07:08 PM   #26 
  - There IS credible statistical evidence  Debs   Jan-01-05 07:27 PM   #29 
  - Evidently not.  forgethell   Jan-01-05 11:40 PM   #51 
  - a republican court?????  bobbieinok   Jan-02-05 01:07 AM   #52 
     - Courts are  forgethell   Jan-02-05 09:47 AM   #57 
  - So, all that we're shooting for here is a simple enquiry?  BullGooseLoony   Jan-01-05 06:38 PM   #15 
     - see post above (#20) n/t  AZDemDist6   Jan-01-05 06:59 PM   #21 
  - plausable deniability  gristy   Jan-01-05 06:29 PM   #10 
  - Please. You are not speaking for me.  higher class   Jan-01-05 06:34 PM   #11 
  - Then show me.  BullGooseLoony   Jan-01-05 06:41 PM   #16 
     - take a look at this thread from the Homepage....  AZDemDist6   Jan-01-05 07:04 PM   #24 
        - THAT is a great start.  BullGooseLoony   Jan-01-05 07:22 PM   #28 
  - Have you actually looked at the issue or have you expected to have it  shance   Jan-01-05 07:06 PM   #25 
  - The Ohio recount is enough to postpone an Electoral Vote  dannynyc   Jan-01-05 09:59 PM   #46 
  - They should be more afraid of what it's going to do to our country  Debbie13   Jan-01-05 06:04 PM   #6 
  - Hell, they cant even call Bush "corrupt" or a "liar" -which is 100% true.  Dr Fate   Jan-01-05 06:10 PM   #7 
  - They're afraid because  catbert836   Jan-01-05 06:36 PM   #12 
  - Just ask Max Cleland or Tom Daschele how well that works.  Dr Fate   Jan-02-05 03:00 PM   #61 
  - Maybe...  KSAtheist   Jan-01-05 07:03 PM   #22 
  - Everyone is on the "take." n/t  itzamirakul   Jan-01-05 07:03 PM   #23 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-01-05 07:11 PM   #27 
  - I hope they know we have all thought about this too  proud patriot   Jan-01-05 07:45 PM   #30 
  - Name one that has the courage to commit  DistressedAmerican   Jan-01-05 08:01 PM   #32 
  - Why do they even want to be a representative if they have to  higher class   Jan-01-05 08:21 PM   #35 
  - No attack on spinelessness for political gain  DistressedAmerican   Jan-01-05 08:37 PM   #39 
  - Why be a representative at all?  Yupster   Jan-01-05 10:02 PM   #47 
  - Se. Robert Byrd.  tblue37   Jan-02-05 02:56 AM   #56 
  - They're afraid of retaliation...professionally and personally.  zann725   Jan-01-05 08:06 PM   #33 
  - Because they don't want to look like kooks.  Silverhair   Jan-01-05 09:45 PM   #43 
  - Telling the truth is "too radical"  Dr Fate   Jan-02-05 03:03 PM   #62 
  - It has happened before. Sometime in the 60's I think.  Silverhair   Jan-01-05 09:49 PM   #44 
  - It happened in 1876 for sure  Yupster   Jan-01-05 10:08 PM   #48 
     - I was talking about a challenge to the EC from a senator.  Silverhair   Jan-01-05 10:48 PM   #49 
  - the REAL answer lies in five letters: M . . . O . . . N . . . E . . .Y  OneBlueSky   Jan-01-05 11:29 PM   #50 
  - Maybe they are still hoping to get swing voters  sampsonblk   Jan-02-05 01:11 AM   #53 
  - They're soft and lazy. They know they'd have to do extra work if they  w4rma   Jan-02-05 11:54 AM   #59 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC