You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #49: I have asked you at least five times [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Fiona Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. I have asked you at least five times
to define and specify this "societal interest". You have yet to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Carl Sagan on abortion rockydem  Dec-20-04 04:44 PM   #0 
  - One thread wasn't enough for you?  Fiona   Dec-20-04 04:47 PM   #1 
  - He was a lot more than just an astrophycisist.  rockydem   Dec-20-04 04:48 PM   #2 
  - Yet again  Fiona   Dec-20-04 04:50 PM   #4 
     - he puts forth a thoughtful arguement  rockydem   Dec-20-04 04:51 PM   #6 
        - or more likely  Fiona   Dec-20-04 04:52 PM   #7 
        - That quote was cherry-picked from the essay.  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 04:59 PM   #19 
           - HE'S NOT ANTI-CHOICE AND NEITHER AM I  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:01 PM   #25 
              - There IS regulation in the latter stages. It's the law of the land...  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:03 PM   #28 
                 - That's not how it has worked out, not at all  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:06 PM   #30 
                    - It has indeed "worked out that way." Third-trimester abortions.  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:09 PM   #36 
                       - they are rare, but really we have no idea  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:12 PM   #40 
                          - Again  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:15 PM   #44 
                          - we should do that  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:18 PM   #52 
                             - why?  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:20 PM   #56 
                                - because society has an interest in keeping its members from  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:21 PM   #59 
                                   - I know you can't.  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:23 PM   #63 
                                      - it is clear, crystal clear  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:27 PM   #64 
                                         - yes  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:28 PM   #65 
                                            - you will be able to have total freedom in the early stages  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:30 PM   #69 
                                            - Why are you speaking in the  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:31 PM   #70 
                                            - Wrong there is virtually no accountability  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:32 PM   #71 
                                            - Enough with the Harpers article  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:35 PM   #74 
                                            - it does not provide those protections  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:37 PM   #77 
                                            - Yet again  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:39 PM   #79 
                                            - it's not online (or you have to be a member)  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:40 PM   #82 
                          - "all I'm saying is that maybe there should be some restrictions"  Forkboy   Dec-20-04 05:15 PM   #45 
                             - IN THE LATER FUCKING STAGES ONLY  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:17 PM   #48 
                                - oh...  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:21 PM   #58 
        - Rocky, what is your beef today?  BlueEyedSon   Dec-20-04 04:55 PM   #11 
           - It all started when a bunch of people put down Harry Reid  rockydem   Dec-20-04 04:58 PM   #13 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-04 05:00 PM   #21 
  - Hey, not only that . . .  TaleWgnDg   Dec-20-04 05:08 PM   #32 
     - I know he did for fuck's sake I'm getting fuckin' sick  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:09 PM   #34 
        - Then how about editing the title of this thread?  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:10 PM   #37 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-04 05:12 PM   #39 
  - And some more from Dr. Sagan  BlueEyedSon   Dec-20-04 04:49 PM   #3 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-04 04:51 PM   #5 
  - Load of bullshit  Warpy   Dec-20-04 04:54 PM   #8 
  - The point is what should and should not be allowed  rockydem   Dec-20-04 04:58 PM   #15 
  - You HAVE better of Sagan  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Dec-20-04 05:00 PM   #20 
  - Yeah, I'm pretty pissed off, too. Sagan is a personal hero of mine.  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:02 PM   #27 
     - there's nothing wrong with what I did  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:07 PM   #31 
        - Your thread title completely misrepresents Sagan's position.  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:11 PM   #38 
           - My thread title is "Carl Sagan on abortion"  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:13 PM   #41 
              - ah  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:16 PM   #47 
              - It does misrepresent his position and I'm sure you know it. - n/t  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:18 PM   #51 
                 - forget it.  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:18 PM   #54 
                    - So, this will be the last of the abortion law threads you start today?  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:29 PM   #68 
                       - there will be more  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:33 PM   #72 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-04 05:36 PM   #76 
                          - Really, the swearing and put-downs...  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:44 PM   #87 
                             - WRONG  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:48 PM   #89 
                                - But you do understand that late-stage abortions...  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:50 PM   #90 
                                   - THEY ARE NOT REGULATED  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:52 PM   #93 
                                      - But why  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:53 PM   #94 
                                         - Because it's reasonable  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:56 PM   #97 
  - Sagan's quote is being taken out of context by the OP.  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:00 PM   #22 
  - Oh gee,another abortion thread  Forkboy   Dec-20-04 04:54 PM   #9 
  - even better  Fiona   Dec-20-04 04:55 PM   #10 
  - Aren't they always?  Warpy   Dec-20-04 04:57 PM   #12 
     - Just what I was thinking.  livinginphotographs   Dec-20-04 05:00 PM   # 
     - Seems that way,doesn't it?  Forkboy   Dec-20-04 05:00 PM   #24 
  - Well at least it isn't the 15th "Christmas under attack, no way" thread  JVS   Dec-20-04 04:58 PM   #17 
     - this is true  Forkboy   Dec-20-04 05:01 PM   #26 
  - IIRC, that was part of an essay in one of Sagan's last books...  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 04:58 PM   #14 
  - It is pro-choice - it's reasonably pro-choice  rockydem   Dec-20-04 04:59 PM   #18 
     - as I said elsewhere  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:00 PM   #23 
     - As if there is an "unreasonable" Pro-Choice?  SlackJawedYokel   Dec-20-04 05:18 PM   #53 
  - Is this a problem somewhere?  sandnsea   Dec-20-04 04:58 PM   #16 
  - Yet Sagan was pro-choice.  Jesus H. Christ   Dec-20-04 05:03 PM   #29 
  - I know he was, and so am I  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:08 PM   #33 
     - Here's how we should approach it....  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:09 PM   #35 
     - nope I think that is the wrong way  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:14 PM   #42 
        - I have asked you at least five times  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:17 PM   #49 
           - becaue it might be a human life  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:20 PM   #57 
              - Rather simplistic, don't you think?  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:22 PM   #61 
                 - nope we can and will arrive at a consensus that at some point  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:28 PM   #66 
                    - and you're describing  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:29 PM   #67 
                       - it's not like that  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:36 PM   #75 
                          - You have  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:38 PM   #78 
                             - the article is not online sorry otherwise I'd post it  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:39 PM   #80 
                                - NO  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:40 PM   #81 
                                   - lol  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:40 PM   #84 
                                      - I'm willing to live  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:44 PM   #86 
     - We should approach the issue by misleading people?  Zenlitened   Dec-20-04 05:15 PM   #43 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-04 05:16 PM   #46 
        - ooh... more swearing!  Fiona   Dec-20-04 05:17 PM   #50 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-04 05:19 PM   #55 
     - Uh-huh. Suuuuuure. (nt)  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Dec-20-04 05:54 PM   #95 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-04 05:22 PM   #60 
  - I'm actually glad you brought this up.  shockra   Dec-20-04 05:23 PM   #62 
  - I think that's an interesting point  rockydem   Dec-20-04 05:35 PM   #73 
  - I think you hit on something there.  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Dec-20-04 05:40 PM   #83 
  - self delete. why pander to this crap AGAIN???  AgadorSparticus   Dec-20-04 05:42 PM   #85 
  - I recently watched the whole "Cosmos" program he did in 1980  PlanetBev   Dec-20-04 05:55 PM   #96 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-04 05:46 PM   #88 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-04 05:51 PM   #91 
  - And your point is...? (nt)  MaineDem   Dec-20-04 05:51 PM   #92 
  - kick  Cheswick2.0   Dec-20-04 05:57 PM   #98 
  - Locking  Moderator   Dec-20-04 05:58 PM   #99 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC