You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: that's even WORSE for Bushco: if they WERE WMDs then why weren't [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. that's even WORSE for Bushco: if they WERE WMDs then why weren't
they either guarded, confiscated or destroyed?

Now THAT's incompetence! And.... if that's the WMD definition, then how many OTHER countries do we have to invade on that basis that have stock of these lethal and common 'WMD's?

Man, that is WEAK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Flopsweat: Prager just said explosives are "WMD"........LMAO Proud2BAmurkin  Oct-28-04 08:50 PM   #0 
  - & Sharpton cornered him like a rat, but Larry saved him with a commercial!  henslee   Oct-28-04 08:52 PM   #1 
  - Even worse for Bush. We were told what they were and where they  kikiek   Oct-28-04 08:52 PM   #2 
  - Dammit, Sharpton.  BullGooseLoony   Oct-28-04 08:52 PM   #3 
  - Sweeeeeeeet!!  oasis   Oct-28-04 08:53 PM   #4 
  - And he allowed the terrorists to take them...  Ksec   Oct-28-04 08:53 PM   #5 
  - That's not gonna work. If they WERE the WMD, wouldn't we have mentioned it  tomfodw   Oct-28-04 08:53 PM   #6 
  - Right, especially since we've destroyed 400,000 TONS of explosives  BullGooseLoony   Oct-28-04 08:57 PM   #7 
  - Maybe the only people in America that can think straight, tomfodw.  kimchi   Oct-28-04 08:58 PM   #9 
  - If they were WMD, why wasn't the discovery  Tansy_Gold   Oct-28-04 08:58 PM   #10 
  - But that's EXACTLY how they are going to spin it!  Kittycat   Oct-28-04 09:00 PM   #12 
     - Hi Kittycat!!  newyawker99   Oct-29-04 07:49 AM   #16 
  - I think they are saying 'WMD' on purpose -  dogtag   Oct-28-04 08:58 PM   #8 
  - Exactly. n/t  CarolynEC   Oct-28-04 09:00 PM   #13 
  - 26,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, 500 tons of  WilliamPitt   Oct-28-04 08:58 PM   #11 
  - Prager is an ass!  dennis4868   Oct-28-04 09:04 PM   #14 
  - HA! Then that will REALLY look like negligence! Nice try, tho!  Digit   Oct-28-04 09:09 PM   #15 
  - that's even WORSE for Bushco: if they WERE WMDs then why weren't  npincus   Oct-29-04 07:52 AM   #17 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC