You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #136: All alerts are considered. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #135
136. All alerts are considered.
Even if a thread has been locked, the mods can still go back and delete rule violations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Post questions about the new rules here. Skinner  Jan-15-04 01:19 PM   #0 
  - Thanks Skinner-  Dookus   Jan-15-04 01:23 PM   #1 
  - Quotes are legal in the title.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:25 PM   #2 
  - Drudge Is a Good Q  DoveTurnedHawk   Jan-15-04 01:26 PM   # 
  - Yeah, it's not uncivil to be PISSED  Hep   Jan-15-04 01:25 PM   #3 
  - Is there a question? (nt)  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:28 PM   #6 
     - Yeah,  Hep   Jan-15-04 01:31 PM   #15 
        - Did I presume what was in your heart? (nt)  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:33 PM   #20 
        - Maybe we should take this to PM.  Hep   Jan-15-04 01:36 PM   #25 
        - Hep... a couple of suggestions  salin   Jan-15-04 03:38 PM   #83 
  - what about:  spychoactive   Jan-15-04 01:25 PM   #4 
  - I would prefer that you not do it.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:28 PM   #8 
  - Is excessive use of the [b]bold[/b] feature a violation?  Padraig18   Jan-15-04 01:26 PM   #5 
  - Depends on how excessive it is, I guess.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:29 PM   #10 
     - Thanks!  Padraig18   Jan-15-04 01:31 PM   #13 
  - I miss the posters with under 250 posts.  jchild   Jan-15-04 01:28 PM   #7 
  - I am sorry too.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:30 PM   #11 
  - Please please please please please!  jchild   Jan-15-04 01:31 PM   #16 
  - Please do reconsider.  Redneck Socialist   Jan-15-04 02:15 PM   #46 
  - Ooooohhhhhkaaaay!  diamondsoul   Jan-15-04 02:33 PM   #60 
     - I just wanted to clarify this post a bit-  diamondsoul   Jan-16-04 10:42 AM   #137 
  - Would you consider a small revision?  Tom Rinaldo   Jan-15-04 01:32 PM   #17 
  - I like this idea.  Tatiana   Jan-15-04 01:36 PM   #24 
  - That does seem more equitable if admin and the mods can  nothingshocksmeanymore   Jan-15-04 02:07 PM   #41 
  - I like the idea too, but would add...  chiburb   Jan-15-04 02:23 PM   #49 
  - This seems reasonable.  edzontar   Jan-15-04 02:42 PM   #67 
  - I remember when Tom Rinaldo first showed up  OKNancy   Jan-15-04 02:34 PM   #62 
     - Thank you very much Nancy . n/t  Tom Rinaldo   Jan-15-04 03:26 PM   #79 
  - Thank you  Jerseycoa   Jan-15-04 01:29 PM   #9 
  - You've got the wrong rule, there.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:33 PM   #19 
  - I like the rules. n/t  Tatiana   Jan-15-04 01:31 PM   #12 
  - Thanks Skinner!  ParanoidPat   Jan-15-04 01:31 PM   #14 
  - LOL! A Du Stun Gun, huh.  jchild   Jan-15-04 01:32 PM   #18 
  - Reacting to a message  DancingBear   Jan-15-04 01:33 PM   #21 
  - No.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:34 PM   #22 
     - Don't be so indecisive  DancingBear   Jan-15-04 01:37 PM   #26 
        - Oh I Can Definitely See How A "Yes" Answer Would Invite All Sorts Of Abuse  arwalden   Jan-15-04 01:47 PM   #31 
           - LOL!  jchild   Jan-15-04 01:49 PM   #33 
  - how much leeway is there with sarcasm?  evil_orange_cat   Jan-15-04 01:35 PM   #23 
  - Not much.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:39 PM   #27 
     - Well,there goes 99% of my posts!  Forkboy   Jan-15-04 01:50 PM   #34 
  - What is a fake sig line?  MATTMAN   Jan-15-04 01:41 PM   #28 
  - If it looks like a sig line,  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:45 PM   #29 
     - Thanks.  MATTMAN   Jan-15-04 01:47 PM   #30 
     - Are all fake sig lines prohibited?  jchild   Jan-15-04 01:48 PM   #32 
        - Yeah, they're pretty much forbidden. (nt)  Skinner   Jan-15-04 01:52 PM   #35 
  - I for one like the new rules...  Democrats unite   Jan-15-04 01:54 PM   #36 
  - The appeal does still work.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 02:24 PM   #51 
  - Are you concerned that there will be..  mvd   Jan-15-04 02:00 PM   #37 
  - I have little doubt that the accusations of bias will continue.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 02:02 PM   #39 
  - At what point will you realize  Forkboy   Jan-15-04 02:01 PM   #38 
  - I realized that about a month ago, actually.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 02:05 PM   #40 
     - What we're learning  Forkboy   Jan-15-04 02:09 PM   #44 
     - I think these rules will help with civility  KaraokeKarlton   Jan-15-04 02:18 PM   #47 
     - If your employers are interested:  secondtermdenier   Jan-16-04 02:34 AM   #120 
        - I think the point he's trying to make  Dookus   Jan-16-04 02:43 AM   #121 
  - How about blatently silly but on-topic jokes to lighten things up?  mouse7   Jan-15-04 02:07 PM   #42 
  - I think that's fine.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 02:09 PM   #43 
     - 30 mins. of flaming... 30 mins of matcom's butt  mouse7   Jan-15-04 02:15 PM   #45 
     - Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo  Forkboy   Jan-15-04 02:23 PM   #50 
     - The moderator just locked "John Adams cannot win (pt. 2)" thread  mouse7   Jan-15-04 02:27 PM   #54 
  - about my sig  bearfartinthewoods   Jan-15-04 02:23 PM   #48 
  - I think I'll have to discuss this one with the moderators.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 02:27 PM   #55 
     - it isn't actually about the primary  bearfartinthewoods   Jan-15-04 02:35 PM   #64 
  - Is excessive use of  TrueAmerican   Jan-15-04 02:25 PM   #52 
  - I would think so. (nt)  Skinner   Jan-15-04 02:27 PM   #56 
  - A question about demerits...  Duder   Jan-15-04 02:26 PM   #53 
  - You don't get a second demerit if your appeal is denied.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 02:29 PM   #57 
     - I thought you got an extra one just for being bothersome by appealing :)  Duder   Jan-15-04 02:33 PM   #61 
  - What about  cheryl27   Jan-15-04 02:30 PM   #58 
  - Your sig is silly...  Duder   Jan-15-04 02:36 PM   #65 
     - No because  cheryl27   Jan-15-04 02:48 PM   #71 
        - Skinner?  cheryl27   Jan-15-04 02:52 PM   #73 
           - I don't think it lives up to the standard of "unambiguously positive"  Skinner   Jan-15-04 03:00 PM   #74 
              - Okey Dokey n/t  cheryl27   Jan-15-04 03:08 PM   #77 
  - can you punish people who report others excessively and gratuitously?  cryofan   Jan-15-04 02:30 PM   #59 
  - Is "Washington Monthly" a conservative news source?  democratreformed   Jan-15-04 02:34 PM   #63 
  - I don't know enough to say.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 02:44 PM   #69 
  - The link was posted on Democrats.com  democratreformed   Jan-15-04 02:47 PM   #70 
     - I think it's fine to post.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 03:01 PM   #75 
        - k - Thanks n/t  democratreformed   Jan-15-04 03:05 PM   #76 
  - oye yeah.....a list or guidance  bearfartinthewoods   Jan-15-04 02:48 PM   #72 
  - Joshua Micah Marshall Writes for Washington Monthly  DoveTurnedHawk   Jan-15-04 07:19 PM   #114 
  - My $.02  jmaier   Jan-15-04 02:38 PM   #66 
  - If the workload becomes too great  Skinner   Jan-15-04 02:43 PM   #68 
     - For what it's worth:  boloboffin   Jan-15-04 03:27 PM   #80 
        - Calling people "opponents" of a particular candidate is legal.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 03:28 PM   #82 
           - Thank you. n/t  boloboffin   Jan-15-04 03:38 PM   #84 
  - Thankyou for this opportunity. One question:  blm   Jan-15-04 03:21 PM   #78 
  - You are certainly welcome to discuss the candidates positions.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 03:27 PM   #81 
  - What is "uncivil" (regarding candidates)?  IndianaGreen   Jan-15-04 03:48 PM   #85 
  - Generally, if your comments are topical and accurate they are legal.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 04:16 PM   #89 
     - Thank you!  IndianaGreen   Jan-15-04 04:19 PM   #92 
  - What about talking about the DLC?  IkeWarnedUs   Jan-15-04 03:59 PM   #86 
  - I don't see any reason why you couldn't post about the DLC or PNAC.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 04:17 PM   #90 
  - I like the new rules for the most part  crunchyfrog   Jan-15-04 04:14 PM   #87 
  - We ditched the 250-post rule and the 1-month rule.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 04:18 PM   #91 
  - We just got rid of the 250-post rule, and the 1-month rule.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 04:15 PM   #88 
  - Can we talk about sex in The Lounge?  Paragon   Jan-15-04 04:22 PM   #93 
  - How about a post titled...  mouse7   Jan-15-04 04:35 PM   #94 
  - I can't see the context here.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 04:37 PM   #95 
     - Here's the link...  mouse7   Jan-15-04 04:40 PM   #96 
        - Please hit alert.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 04:43 PM   #97 
           - It's been hit. Several times.  mouse7   Jan-15-04 04:55 PM   #99 
              - Sometimes it takes a while.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 04:59 PM   #101 
  - Should people alert on posters who come onto peaceful threads  KaraokeKarlton   Jan-15-04 04:50 PM   #98 
  - The rules say posts have to be on-topic.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 04:58 PM   #100 
     - Thanks for the quick answer  KaraokeKarlton   Jan-15-04 05:00 PM   #102 
  - A comment, not a question: I've cleared out my ignore list because of the  AP   Jan-15-04 05:08 PM   #103 
  - You are very optimistic.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 05:09 PM   #104 
  - I'm sure it's going to mean more work for the mod's however.  AP   Jan-15-04 05:43 PM   #107 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-15-04 05:12 PM   #105 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-15-04 05:18 PM   #106 
  - We Think Alike, AP  DoveTurnedHawk   Jan-15-04 06:52 PM   #113 
     - Do you feel this way:? I WANT to engage with people with whom I disagree  AP   Jan-15-04 10:48 PM   #116 
  - I give up...sigh  KaraokeKarlton   Jan-15-04 05:57 PM   #108 
  - Although I don't know what post you're talking about,  AP   Jan-15-04 06:02 PM   #109 
  - I think we have a difference of expectations.  Skinner   Jan-15-04 06:16 PM   #110 
     - Furthermore, if the rule were "no clouds over sunny posts"  AP   Jan-15-04 06:26 PM   #111 
     - Actually AP I would just appreciate being able to post a thread  KaraokeKarlton   Jan-16-04 12:32 AM   #119 
     - I haven't looked at the thread since I logged on as of yet  KaraokeKarlton   Jan-16-04 12:04 AM   #118 
  - Kick  jmaier   Jan-15-04 06:50 PM   #112 
  - Kick to see how fair Skinner has been with those who posted here. He's  KoKo01   Jan-15-04 09:59 PM   #115 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-15-04 11:28 PM   #117 
  - Not a question, but I hope the mods could ease up a little.  rhite5   Jan-16-04 04:13 AM   #122 
  - We have no plans to ease up.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 08:38 AM   #125 
  - kick  jchild   Jan-16-04 08:35 AM   #123 
  - Can I say  xultar   Jan-16-04 08:37 AM   #124 
  - I wish you could.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 08:39 AM   #126 
     - What about  xultar   Jan-16-04 08:43 AM   #127 
     - OK one more and I'll shut up...What about?  xultar   Jan-16-04 08:44 AM   #128 
        - I think that's really enough of this.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 08:50 AM   #129 
           - I just wanted to give you a laugh and a smile as a gift  xultar   Jan-16-04 09:46 AM   #133 
              - Thanks.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 09:50 AM   #134 
  - Is my sig line okay?  curse10   Jan-16-04 08:55 AM   #130 
  - I think not.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 09:02 AM   #131 
     - Removed.  curse10   Jan-16-04 09:05 AM   #132 
  - a question about thread locking and alerts  bearfartinthewoods   Jan-16-04 10:17 AM   #135 
  - All alerts are considered.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 10:25 AM   #136 
  - is this unduly inflammatory?  goodhue   Jan-16-04 10:53 AM   #138 
  - Not sure if it's unduly inflammatory.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 10:59 AM   #139 
     - double standards?  goodhue   Jan-16-04 11:07 AM   #140 
        - I think it would be legal regardless of who it was said about.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 11:22 AM   #141 
           - fair enough  goodhue   Jan-16-04 11:26 AM   #142 
              - I've got a secret for you.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 11:40 AM   #143 
                 - thanks  goodhue   Jan-16-04 11:53 AM   #144 
                    - We have a rule requiring posts to be topical.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 11:55 AM   #145 
  - Why is it "inappropriate" to post a quote from a candidate?  jsw_81   Jan-16-04 02:59 PM   #146 
  - You need to re-read the GD:2004 rules.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 03:02 PM   #147 
     - But Drudge was only one of several sources that reported that quote  jsw_81   Jan-16-04 04:27 PM   #149 
        - Read the rules. There is actually a proper procedure for cases like this.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 04:30 PM   #151 
  - "If I wanted to vote for a Republican, I would"  WhoCountsTheVotes   Jan-16-04 04:24 PM   #148 
  - No, it's not.  Skinner   Jan-16-04 04:29 PM   #150 
     - Can I call them Bush Lite?  WhoCountsTheVotes   Jan-16-04 09:16 PM   #152 
  - I have one........... a poster in a Clark thread requesting a photo of  Clark Can WIN   Jan-16-04 09:51 PM   #153 
  - I would like to add that the same poster has gone on to more offensive  Clark Can WIN   Jan-16-04 10:10 PM   #154 
     - OK I'm sorry for asking but I was frustrated  Clark Can WIN   Jan-16-04 10:46 PM   #155 
  - kick  jchild   Jan-17-04 02:13 PM   #156 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC