Reply #11: MIHOP

[DrDebug]

For those who want an overview of all the physical evidence as well

By Stallion4

This is some of the most compelling evidence and information that I've been able to compile over the past few months that supports a 9/11 cover-up. The official government story says that an Arab named Osama bin Laden (still at large) engineered the whole thing while located in a cave somewhere in Afghanistan with the help of 19 other Arabs who hijacked U.S. commercial jets with box-cutters and flew them into the World Trade Center Towers and Pentagon with pinpoint accuracy. This is only a small portion of evidence and information that proves we've all been lied to by the United States government about what really happened on 9/11

http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread8820.html (Most complete version)

Mirror: http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/index.php/MIHOP

By Spooked911

I (=Spooked911) am dedicated to finding out the truth about 9/11. I think the evidence is incontrovertible that the WTC towers were blown up by controlled demolition on 9/11, as well as WTC7. Other aspects of that day are less clear, but all in all 9/ 11 appears to be a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the American people to generate bloodlust.

http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/

By Dr. David Ray Griffin
The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie
115 lies in the official report

In discussing my second 9/11 book, The 9/ 11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, I have often said, only half in jest, that a better title might have been “a 571-page lie.” (Actually, I was saying “a 567-page lie,” because I was forgetting to count the four pages of the Preface.) In making this statement, one of my points has been that the entire Report is constructed in support of one big lie: that the official story about 9/11 is true. Another point, however, is that in the process of telling this overall lie, The 9/ 11 Commission Report tells many lies about particular issues. This point is implied by my critique’s subtitle, “Omissions and Distortions.” It might be thought, to be sure, that of the two types of problems signaled by those two terms, only those designated “distortions” can be considered lies.

http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=551&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

Simple Math Proves that the 9/11 Account is a fabrication
by Elias Davidsson

The term “official 9/11 account” refers to the account of the events of Sept. 11, 2001, as presented in June 2004 by the Commission of Inquiry appointed by President George W. Bush, and complemented by other official documents issued by US government agencies. This account includes various details, such as identities of the alleged hijackers, identities of aircraft, timelines and other data used to prove that the crime of 9/11 was perpetrated by the named individuals under the orders or the inspiration of Osama bin Laden and other al Qaeda leaders.

It can be demonstrated by two straightforward mathematical techniques that the official acccount on 9/11 is simply not true.

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/DAV504A.html

How many coincidences are there? Isn't it time to reinvestigate 9/11?