Reply #153: I think Steven Jone's theory is convincing enough

[mirandapriestly]

but a biased agency that would say there is "no evidence" for a blast, would also say there is "no evidence" for thermite for the very reasons that make it such a good choice - it doesn't leave any conclusive proof - it's traces can be attributed to other things. After I found out that Jones was involved ending cold fusion research through a connection with the Department of Energy, I concluded that it's possible that this is a set up. In fact, it bears all the marks of one and not because there is anything wrong, really, with thermite.

*Thermite doesn't leave any conclusive trace
*Jones wasn't present at the public meeting with NIST where they discussed Thermite and said there was "no evidence" of explosions.
*The FAST removal of evidence, also makes proof difficult
*because Jones is the only person who has been taken even remotely seriously, thermite was all that NIST looked at, so they will say "no evidence" for thermite so controlled demolition is case closed-classic trick at work.

People like me are no match for the power and money of government agencies that are controlled by the Bush administration. If they want to deceive us they will.