Reply #31: I'm not going to back down because I am sick of this...

[originalpckelly]

Now I don't want to become engaged in a flame war or anything, but I do intend to be firm.

The conspiracy theory you and other people are advancing has many more holes than the conventional 9/11 attack theory.

1. What were those airplanes we all saw hit the towers?
2. Why would the people who planned the conspiracy use airplanes for the towers, yet not use an airplanes for Shanksville and the Pentagon?
3. Where did all the people go who were on the airplanes that hit the Pentagon?
4. Many have claimed the twin towers were brought down with a controlled demolition, why weren't there more explosives used?
5. How did explosives go unnoticed by the people in the towers?
6. Why didn't the people who supposedly blew up the towers, blow them both up at the same time?
7. 3,000 people were killed in the attacks, why wouldn't someone involved in the conspiracy, which would have to be massive, come forward out of conscience?

There are probably more questions than these few I thought up in a couple of minutes, why do these questions outnumber the conventional explanation, and why would someone think the conspiracy theory is more valid when it has far more unanswered questions to it?