You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: No, that's not true. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
34. No, that's not true.
You're forgetting that some people lie, and that some are delusional.
For those reasons, there are plenty of cases of eyewitness testimony being absolute and total bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -How reliable are eyewitnesses? jschurchin  May-09-06 04:16 PM   #0 
  - This is, FINALLY, something up my alley  Hope2006   May-09-06 05:15 PM   #1 
  - I agree with you, eyewitnesses are generally not that reliable  Sinti   May-09-06 06:53 PM   #2 
  - Absolutely agreed.  Jazz2006   May-09-06 07:18 PM   #3 
  - I could not agree more with this statement.  jschurchin   May-09-06 08:02 PM   #4 
  - Yes, but there is always SOME element of truth  Hope2006   May-09-06 09:49 PM   #6 
     - What are you on about?  Jazz2006   May-09-06 10:54 PM   #17 
     - Huh?  Hope2006   May-09-06 11:01 PM   #20 
        - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   May-09-06 11:04 PM   #21 
     - No, that's not true.  greyl   May-10-06 01:19 AM   #34 
        - Yes, you are correct  Hope2006   May-10-06 04:12 AM   #35 
  - Impressive...  Hope2006   May-09-06 09:44 PM   #5 
  - Jazz..you are an amazement  Hope2006   May-09-06 09:59 PM   #7 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   May-09-06 10:03 PM   #9 
     - Exactly, Miranda n/t  Hope2006   May-09-06 10:06 PM   #10 
     - Awww, what a cute tag team you two make...  Jazz2006   May-09-06 10:51 PM   #16 
        - See what I mean?  Hope2006   May-09-06 10:59 PM   #19 
           - Actually, yes, I am.  Jazz2006   May-09-06 11:17 PM   #23 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   May-09-06 10:49 PM   #15 
        - "tinhatters"  Hope2006   May-09-06 11:24 PM   #24 
           - How can "tinhatters" be considered a personal attack....  Jazz2006   May-09-06 11:28 PM   #25 
           - Come on, Jazz  Hope2006   May-09-06 11:37 PM   #26 
              - You should be more careful about the PMs you send, Hope....  Jazz2006   May-09-06 11:38 PM   #27 
                 - Sure, go ahead n/t  Hope2006   May-09-06 11:40 PM   #28 
                    - Nah, it's not my style to post something that comes into my  Jazz2006   May-09-06 11:58 PM   #29 
           - "tinhatters" sounds like  mirandapriestly   May-10-06 11:18 AM   #39 
     - No, you're wrong, Hope2006  Jazz2006   May-09-06 10:47 PM   #14 
        - Sorry Jazz...but you have not convinced me  Hope2006   May-09-06 10:58 PM   #18 
           - I'm not trying to "convince" you of anything.  Jazz2006   May-09-06 11:04 PM   #22 
  - Additionally the numbers are vastly inflated.....  catnhatnh   May-09-06 10:02 PM   #8 
  - Thanks so much for your logic!  mirandapriestly   May-09-06 10:08 PM   #11 
     - Thanks for the kind words....  catnhatnh   May-09-06 10:11 PM   #12 
        - heh heh..nt  mirandapriestly   May-09-06 10:16 PM   #13 
  - Sorry to interrupt the shitstorm...  KJF   May-10-06 12:27 AM   #30 
  - How dare you re-establish....  catnhatnh   May-10-06 12:59 AM   #31 
  - It is unfortunate, indeed, that a good thread was hijacked by a couple of  Jazz2006   May-10-06 01:00 AM   #32 
  - That's difficult to quantify beyond "they aren't very".  greyl   May-10-06 01:10 AM   #33 
  - Blah Blah Blah...  Peter Frank   May-10-06 05:34 AM   #36 
  - I gotta...  quickesst   May-10-06 06:58 AM   #37 
     - Nah, post 23 was the first ad hominem. nt  greyl   May-10-06 08:05 AM   #38 
     - You make them all the time, greyl  mirandapriestly   May-10-06 11:30 AM   #40 
        - It's all...  quickesst   May-10-06 12:08 PM   #43 
        - Sadly you're right  mirandapriestly   May-11-06 04:31 AM   #55 
        - That's an extreme exaggeration.  greyl   May-10-06 01:13 PM   #44 
        - Not true, miranda.  Jazz2006   May-10-06 06:07 PM   #49 
     - Welcome to the DU quickesst...  Peter Frank   May-10-06 02:40 PM   #46 
     - Not so, quickesst  Jazz2006   May-10-06 06:04 PM   #48 
  - Just an observation  Bjarne Riis   May-10-06 11:33 AM   #41 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-10-06 01:37 PM   #45 
  - You must be joking!  Bjarne Riis   May-10-06 04:15 PM   #47 
  - Bjarne Riis. Flying aircraft without formal training does not  Jazz2006   May-10-06 06:20 PM   #51 
  - What happened to your post, greyl?  Jazz2006   May-10-06 07:00 PM   #52 
  - You've misunderstood, Bjarne Riis  Jazz2006   May-10-06 06:11 PM   #50 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-06 04:27 AM   #54 
     - For someone who  Jazz2006   May-15-06 01:15 AM   #56 
     - Stop responding to my posts  mirandapriestly   May-15-06 04:16 AM   #57 
        - Right. Just as soon as you stop lying about me and trying to disparage  Jazz2006   May-15-06 04:26 AM   #58 
  - Ah, Memories of a faulty eyewitness  simonm   May-10-06 11:54 AM   #42 
     - Sadly,  Jazz2006   May-11-06 12:57 AM   #53 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC