You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: Try this one [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Try this one
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=476332052935635...

The collapse starts around 10 seconds into the video. At 20 seconds it is clearly not completely collapsed. One can make the argument the collapse was completely over somewhere past 20 seconds of fall time.

Look carefully at the bottom left of the video and you can see the heads of people moving in real time, not slow motion.

The video seem to be in real time, I pulled it off google in about 30 seconds. So unless you have a some legitimate reason to believe it is altered, you have a serious hole in you theory.

The interesting part will be to see if you have the intellectual back bone to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hard Evidence For Controlled Demolition medienanalyse  Mar-18-06 04:14 PM   #0 
  - I sucked at chemistry  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-18-06 04:31 PM   #1 
  - Makeup  simonm   Mar-19-06 05:09 PM   #80 
     - That charts shows an elemental analysis  LARED   Mar-19-06 05:31 PM   #81 
     - Here's another chart from the USGS site  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 07:25 PM   #83 
  - Fun with TYPOS!!! How many can YOU find? Let's count...  file83   Mar-18-06 05:06 PM   #2 
  - Out of line  JackRiddler   Mar-18-06 06:06 PM   #4 
  - It being 4.5 years since 9/11 isn't a "substantive" critique?  file83   Mar-18-06 10:17 PM   #10 
  - Perhaps it would be better if medienanalyse were to post in German. n/t  Make7   Mar-18-06 06:14 PM   #5 
  - May I ask you a Question.  jschurchin   Mar-18-06 05:58 PM   #3 
  - So what are the chemical characteristics of thermite  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-18-06 07:54 PM   #6 
  - 5-10 ppm of Uranium?  dailykoff   Mar-18-06 08:19 PM   #7 
  - Does uranium turn up  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 07:39 AM   #23 
     - Dunno, but that's 50-100 pounds of uranium  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 10:43 AM   #34 
        - According to the chart, they found about 10 ppm of uranium  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 11:00 AM   #36 
           - Perhaps from old smoke detectors  simonm   Mar-19-06 11:15 AM   #40 
           - And glow-in-the dark watch dials.  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 11:19 AM   #42 
           - Good question. The usual guestimate is 500,000 tons  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 11:17 AM   #41 
           - p.s. short answer: 5,000-10,000 pounds of uranium. (n/t)  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 11:30 AM   #44 
           - Weight of WTC  Kevin Fenton   Mar-19-06 11:48 AM   #47 
              - This article says there was 600,000 tons of fine particle dust  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 11:54 AM   #50 
                 - 5-10 ppm = 6,000-12,000 pounds of uranium  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 01:06 PM   #61 
                 - That doesn't make any sense  Kevin Fenton   Mar-19-06 03:14 PM   #74 
                    - Most of the buildings were concrete and wallboard  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 03:48 PM   #77 
                       - It's hard not to reach that conclusion.  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 08:05 PM   #84 
                       - Tests  simonm   Mar-19-06 08:37 PM   #85 
                          - None that I know of.  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 09:13 PM   #86 
                             - p.s. looks like one of those "heckuva job" situations:  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 09:55 PM   #87 
                             - Birth defects article:  dailykoff   Mar-22-06 01:00 AM   #110 
                       - I doubt it  Kevin Fenton   Mar-20-06 07:21 AM   #91 
                          - You admit that almost 50% of the building  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-20-06 07:34 AM   #92 
                             - From the photos I'd say it was closer to 90%.  dailykoff   Mar-20-06 08:24 AM   #94 
  - Thermite composition  simonm   Mar-18-06 09:13 PM   #8 
  - Iron oxide is also what magnetic computer disks are made of ..  hack89   Mar-19-06 09:36 AM   #28 
     - LOL - Finely pulverized floppy disks  simonm   Mar-19-06 11:01 AM   #37 
        - Sulfur is easy to explain  LARED   Mar-19-06 12:07 PM   #52 
        - Steel Sulfidation is not easy to explain  simonm   Mar-19-06 12:54 PM   #59 
        - The chart indicates  LARED   Mar-19-06 03:10 PM   #73 
        - I asked you before, but how do you liberate sulfur  Bouvet_Island   Mar-20-06 10:17 PM   #104 
           - Re:  LARED   Mar-21-06 07:10 AM   #109 
              - The source's link  Bouvet_Island   Mar-22-06 08:42 PM   #111 
        - pretty funny..nt  mirandapriestly   Mar-20-06 11:07 PM   #105 
  - Forgot magnesium  simonm   Mar-18-06 09:22 PM   #9 
  - Thermite isn't actually an explosive, is it?  mirandapriestly   Mar-18-06 11:11 PM   #11 
  - Then what other chemicals  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 04:18 AM   #15 
  - Calcium is contained in RDX military explosives  simonm   Mar-19-06 10:48 AM   #35 
     - You know  salvorhardin   Mar-19-06 04:29 PM   #79 
  - Thermite is great for cutting steel  simonm   Mar-19-06 10:34 AM   #33 
     - Neither are 757's  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 11:55 AM   #51 
     - I thought the discussion was about the World Trade Center. ( n/t )  Make7   Mar-19-06 12:52 PM   #58 
     - Another thing about thermite  mirandapriestly   Mar-20-06 01:23 AM   #88 
        - Is there any other substance  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-20-06 07:10 AM   #90 
           - You know, I haven't checked  mirandapriestly   Mar-20-06 09:51 AM   #96 
  - Top two elements: Silicon and Calcium.  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 06:13 AM   #19 
     - Easily explained  simonm   Mar-19-06 11:33 AM   #45 
     - The things is  mirandapriestly   Mar-21-06 03:22 AM   #107 
  - medieanalyse, I think Prof Jones  mirandapriestly   Mar-18-06 11:14 PM   #12 
  - Unable to think. Unable to write correctly. I am so sorry....  medienanalyse   Mar-19-06 03:30 AM   #13 
     - I didn't say anything about your spelling  mirandapriestly   Mar-19-06 02:52 PM   #72 
     - Who here claims "expertise" or "proof" with "physical evidence"?  mirandapriestly   Mar-20-06 11:30 AM   #98 
  - Hard evidence - no problem  Kevin Fenton   Mar-19-06 03:44 AM   #14 
  - You wouldn't have to ask those questions if  rman   Mar-19-06 04:30 AM   #16 
  - She doesn't believe the official story  Kevin Fenton   Mar-19-06 05:12 AM   #17 
     - Then how does medienanalyse explain the free fall collapse  rman   Mar-19-06 05:20 AM   #18 
        - Why would someone need to explain something  LARED   Mar-19-06 06:23 AM   #20 
           - Of course  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 07:41 AM   #24 
              - What does that have to do with my comments?  LARED   Mar-19-06 08:23 AM   #25 
                 - I don't believe anything  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 08:45 AM   #26 
                 - freefall  simonm   Mar-19-06 10:22 AM   #32 
                    - All 3 buildings fell basically with no resistance from the floors below  LARED   Mar-19-06 11:37 AM   #46 
                       - Lared, my favorite debunker - 110 floors in 10 seconds - I smell Bullshit  simonm   Mar-19-06 11:54 AM   #49 
                          - One problem; 10 seconds is a myth.  LARED   Mar-19-06 12:09 PM   #53 
                             - Prove it  simonm   Mar-19-06 12:13 PM   #55 
                                - Try this one  LARED   Mar-19-06 12:32 PM   #56 
                                - This one as well. One of your favorites  LARED   Mar-19-06 01:04 PM   #60 
                                   - The NIST reported that the towers fell at free fall speeds  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 01:11 PM   #62 
                                   - I believe that was FEMA, not the NIST  LARED   Mar-19-06 01:12 PM   #63 
                                      - FEMA too? NIST: "came down essentially in free fall  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 01:41 PM   #66 
                                   - wow you are amazing  simonm   Mar-19-06 01:21 PM   #64 
                                      - Wow, what a lame response  LARED   Mar-19-06 01:30 PM   #65 
                                         - Your attempts are lame  simonm   Mar-19-06 01:41 PM   #67 
                                            - I suspected there is a deficit of intellectual honesty  LARED   Mar-19-06 01:47 PM   #68 
                                               - Methodology  simonm   Mar-19-06 01:59 PM   #69 
                                                  - You are admonishing me on methodology????  LARED   Mar-19-06 02:05 PM   #70 
                                                     - methodology is important  simonm   Mar-19-06 03:42 PM   #76 
  - Every single photograph is hard evidence.  dailykoff   Mar-19-06 06:27 AM   #21 
  - Assuming you are in the States  LARED   Mar-19-06 06:34 AM   #22 
  - Photographic evidence - Seeing is believing  simonm   Mar-19-06 10:14 AM   #31 
  - Dust Analysis  Kai   Mar-19-06 09:12 AM   #27 
  - Could you edit your post?  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 10:09 AM   #30 
  - Perhaps you should give them more than 3 minutes to do so.  Make7   Mar-19-06 11:14 AM   #39 
  - Two problems with this analysis  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-19-06 03:59 PM   #78 
  - Here is another dust analysis ..  hack89   Mar-19-06 09:40 AM   #29 
  - official analysis ...  medienanalyse   Mar-19-06 11:10 AM   #38 
     - Explosions did occur  simonm   Mar-19-06 11:23 AM   #43 
     - I agree: pancakes are silent  medienanalyse   Mar-19-06 12:12 PM   #54 
        - View the video  simonm   Mar-19-06 12:37 PM   #57 
        - yawn. For sure. I know. That is what I said. n.t.  medienanalyse   Mar-19-06 02:51 PM   #71 
        - What's going on inside the building?  sgsmith   Mar-19-06 03:33 PM   #75 
        - Examples of pancaked collapses  mirandapriestly   Mar-20-06 10:05 AM   #97 
     - This was not an official analysis ..  hack89   Mar-19-06 06:09 PM   #82 
     - Despite all the discussion  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-20-06 05:28 PM   #101 
        - We don't need no stinking evidence to know they're guilty...  salvorhardin   Mar-20-06 06:42 PM   #102 
           - Oh I've got evidence  DoYouEverWonder   Mar-20-06 07:08 PM   #103 
  - Free Fall Proves Demolition, Images Show How Free Fall Attained  Christophera   Mar-19-06 11:49 AM   #48 
  - buildings didnt fall  sabbat hunter   Mar-20-06 08:22 AM   #93 
     - Oh, but they did  rman   Mar-20-06 09:13 AM   #95 
        - no they did not  sabbat hunter   Mar-20-06 11:50 AM   #99 
           - -very- close to free fall,  rman   Mar-20-06 01:38 PM   #100 
  - A Link for Andreas  Tobias   Mar-20-06 02:27 AM   #89 
  - delete by author  mirandapriestly   Mar-21-06 02:47 AM   #106 
  - We can't conclude ANYTHING ...  stickdog   Mar-21-06 05:38 AM   #108 
  - This is very uncomfortable....I agree with you.  MercutioATC   Mar-23-06 03:24 AM   #112 
  - There ARE WTC folks who noticed strange goings on. Weird  soothsayer   Sep-20-06 05:52 PM   #113 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC