You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: Collapse of the WTC buildings and military response to Flight 77 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. Collapse of the WTC buildings and military response to Flight 77
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 10:10 AM by Time for change
That's a very interesting story about the explosives in the elevator shafts. But I am totally confused as to the motive you ascribe to it. You attribute this idea to the "powers that be", and you suggest the primary motive was to prevent the building from falling over sideways in the event of a terrorist attack, if I understand you correctly.

So, are you saying that this idea was implemented by the Clinton administration or by foreign terrorists?

And are you saying then that this was done to save lives in the event of a terrorist attack? That sounds incredible to me, especially in view of the fact that when a terrorist attack did occur the response was to detonate the building (according to your theory), in a situation where (from everything I understand about this) had there been no explosives in the buildings, they probably would not have collapsed at all.


With regard to the military response to Flight 77, it seems to me that there are so many unanswered questions:

1) You agree that the military must have known about the attacks by 9:03 at the latest. Then why didn't they get a figher jet up in the air before 9:30?

2) Why were all those false versions put forth by the military and the 9/11 Commission to explain the lack of military response, as discussed in my OP?

3) You say, regarding Andrews AFB that "'combat units in the highest possible state of readiness'" does not mean alert fighters". Then why did they change their websites shortly after 9/11?

4) Do you think that the pilot of the plane had the required skill to hit the Pentagon where it was hit (That, as I assume you know, is another one of the arguments for the Pentagon being hit by something other than Flight 77, though I didn't discuss it in my OP).

5) And what about the meeting that Minetta had with Cheney shortly before the hit, testified to before the 9/11 Commission (discussed in my OP). The 9/11 Commission interpreted Cheney's orders as meaning orders to shoot down the plane. How could that possibly be? The military claims that they weren't even aware of Flight 77 until 9:34 -- yet Cheney is apparently right on top of the situation all along, telling the young man who kept on interupting his meeting that "the order still stands". Doesn't it make more sense that his order was carried out, and that order was to allow whatever happened to happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Flight 77, the Fake War on Terror, and the Dubai Port Deal Time for change  Feb-27-06 04:27 PM   #0 
  - An exceptional compilation. Nominated.  Just Me   Feb-27-06 04:34 PM   #1 
  - This is the new millenium version of JFK  EOO   Feb-27-06 04:37 PM   #2 
  - That's the big question I have...  KansDem   Feb-27-06 04:43 PM   #4 
  - That part of what happened on 9/11 is the most mind-boggling  EOO   Feb-27-06 04:50 PM   #6 
  - I think that the administration was complicit in the attacks  Time for change   Feb-27-06 06:12 PM   #11 
  - K&R... bookmarked  Canuckistanian   Feb-27-06 04:42 PM   #3 
  - Excellent, as always. Recommended. Bookmarked.  understandinglife   Feb-27-06 04:44 PM   #5 
  - really dumb  Bacchus39   Feb-27-06 04:50 PM   #7 
  - I'll try to address your concerns, but there's no need to call me dumb  Time for change   Feb-27-06 05:36 PM   #10 
  - The video is the biggest question to answer  IronLionZion   Feb-28-06 01:18 PM   #42 
  - your theory still has not accounted for the plane and the passengers.  MrSammo1   Feb-27-06 06:57 PM   #17 
  - so glad you took the time to post...  Psyop Samurai   Feb-27-06 07:22 PM   #22 
  - ...still has not accounted for the plane and the passengers.  MrSammo1   Feb-28-06 01:41 PM   #46 
     - I think you meant this reply to post # 7, right? n/t  Time for change   Feb-28-06 02:06 PM   #47 
        - Well............Duh......on my part.......  MrSammo1   Feb-28-06 02:34 PM   #51 
  - Then why were all the video tapes confiscated.  drdtroit   Feb-28-06 02:19 PM   #49 
  - Neither Has Your Comments - Show Us the Video of Pentagon Crash  we can do it   Mar-01-06 11:25 AM   #60 
  - I'm SO sick of these threads getting locked and moved  RazzleDazzle   Feb-27-06 05:00 PM   #8 
  - That summary has a tremendous amount of information in it - thank you  Time for change   Feb-27-06 06:21 PM   #13 
  - Me Too - I Am Withholding Any Further Donation Until It Ceases  we can do it   Mar-01-06 11:29 AM   #62 
  - Hyping Terror For Fun, Profit - And Power  iconoclastNYC   Feb-27-06 05:18 PM   #9 
  - Wow, that's amazing  Time for change   Feb-27-06 07:02 PM   #18 
  - moved... okay... but I can't even recommend posts in here  BelgianMadCow   Feb-27-06 06:12 PM   #12 
  - I had seen some 9/11 posts on GD recently, so I thought it was ok  Time for change   Feb-27-06 08:54 PM   #26 
     - I think the problem may be that scattered within  greyl   Feb-28-06 08:13 AM   #31 
        - Thanks - please tell me what assertions you are referring to n/t  Time for change   Feb-28-06 09:09 AM   #33 
           - The entire middle section.  greyl   Feb-28-06 09:30 AM   #34 
              - Can you be more specific?  Time for change   Feb-28-06 10:46 AM   #36 
                 - Compare your post 35 with the related info from this link:  greyl   Feb-28-06 11:26 AM   #37 
                    - Burden of proof...  EOTE   Feb-28-06 12:40 PM   #38 
                    - Burden of proof indeed.  greyl   Feb-28-06 01:14 PM   #41 
                    - In other words, you're telling me to go find out myself  Time for change   Feb-28-06 01:11 PM   #40 
                       - Suit yourself, I'm easy.  greyl   Feb-28-06 01:32 PM   #45 
                          - I'm sorry that I sounded confrontational about this  Time for change   Feb-28-06 02:16 PM   #48 
                             - Sure, yes that's what I had in mind. :) nt  greyl   Feb-28-06 02:21 PM   #50 
                                - Collapse of the twin towers  Time for change   Mar-02-06 07:57 PM   #68 
                                   - Did you hit "post" before  greyl   Mar-03-06 05:25 PM   #75 
                                      - I don't know what happened  Time for change   Mar-03-06 05:45 PM   #76 
  - Here is an excellent video  sunnystarr   Feb-27-06 06:37 PM   #14 
  - Yes, that is excellent indeed  Time for change   Feb-27-06 08:05 PM   #25 
  - The 9/11 Commission Report is a Whitewash.  reprehensor   Feb-27-06 06:45 PM   #15 
  - It certainly was  Time for change   Feb-27-06 07:09 PM   #20 
  - No more recs...  hootinholler   Feb-27-06 06:46 PM   #16 
  - Thanks for trying  Time for change   Feb-28-06 07:34 AM   #29 
  - There is a logical reason the FAA delayed in contacting NORAD  Jose Diablo   Feb-27-06 07:07 PM   #19 
  - Yes, that's a pretty good explanation  Time for change   Feb-27-06 07:12 PM   #21 
     - I keep going over this stuff.  atomic-fly   Feb-27-06 07:40 PM   #23 
        - Of course they have the MSM to help keep the lid on this  Time for change   Feb-27-06 08:03 PM   #24 
  - Loose Change II Giving Away Plain-Wrapper Copies At Cost!  corbett   Feb-27-06 10:18 PM   #27 
  - Thank you -- I just viewed the video that Sunnystar supplied yesterday  Time for change   Feb-28-06 07:30 AM   #28 
  - No they aren't.  greyl   Feb-28-06 08:07 AM   #30 
  - It's out now, just watch it on Google video for free nt  IronLionZion   Feb-28-06 01:22 PM   #44 
  - Or just watch it for free on Google Video  IronLionZion   Feb-28-06 01:21 PM   #43 
  - Your cavalier disregard for the facts  Kevin Fenton   Feb-28-06 09:07 AM   #32 
  - My response to your criticisms  Time for change   Feb-28-06 10:42 AM   #35 
  - Griffin's method is poor  Kevin Fenton   Feb-28-06 02:36 PM   #52 
  - I prefer the www.911review.com position  MrSammo1   Feb-28-06 03:02 PM   #53 
  - I'd like to get down to the heart of the matter  Time for change   Feb-28-06 03:20 PM   #54 
     - The difference between incompetence and MIHOP  Kevin Fenton   Feb-28-06 04:11 PM   #55 
     - I'd like to see if I understand your position correctly  Time for change   Feb-28-06 05:44 PM   #56 
     - It's like this...  Kevin Fenton   Feb-28-06 11:54 PM   #58 
        - Collapse of the WTC buildings and military response to Flight 77  Time for change   Mar-01-06 09:40 AM   #59 
        - Lots  Kevin Fenton   Mar-01-06 11:27 AM   #61 
           - I'm very skeptical about all this  Time for change   Mar-01-06 12:38 PM   #64 
              - Technical answer  Kevin Fenton   Mar-01-06 01:48 PM   #65 
                 - I see four reasons to favor the theory that the Bush administration had  Time for change   Mar-02-06 07:27 PM   #67 
                    - Unocal, etc.  Kevin Fenton   Mar-03-06 04:09 AM   #69 
                       - They couldn't have gotten near the NYSE  dailykoff   Mar-03-06 04:57 AM   #70 
                       - Map  Kevin Fenton   Mar-03-06 06:02 AM   #71 
                          - 1) Too far, 2) No  dailykoff   Mar-03-06 08:06 AM   #73 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-03-06 05:19 PM   #74 
                          - Afghanistan, Cheney  Kevin Fenton   Mar-04-06 01:51 AM   #77 
                             - Response  Time for change   Mar-04-06 07:39 AM   #78 
        - I like this argument.  Bushwick Bill   Mar-01-06 12:06 PM   #63 
           - Thank you  Kevin Fenton   Mar-01-06 02:23 PM   #66 
     - but that the no-757 argument at the Pentagon is an absolute donkey that do  MrSammo1   Feb-28-06 07:23 PM   #57 
     - This may clear it up some  The Straight Story   Aug-20-06 04:45 PM   #81 
  - About the differences in Manifests  The Straight Story   Aug-20-06 04:39 PM   #80 
  - ah yes, the infamous smoke and water jet covered hole  rman   Mar-03-06 06:29 AM   #72 
  - You know what makes a nice round hole in a building?  IronLionZion   Feb-28-06 01:04 PM   #39 
  - Griffin's book will go down in history as the best account of 9/11  rverne8   Aug-20-06 03:19 PM   #79 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC