You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #58: It's like this... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Kevin Fenton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. It's like this...
There are two explanations as to why the WTC was blown up. There is the false-flag operation to stimulate war and there is the "explosives were there anyway" argument, which I favour (and which Griffin ignores, the way he ignores all other explanations for government malfeasance). Basically, after the 1993 bombing (the bombers tried to collapse one tower onto the other, which would then fall onto Lower Manhattan itself - just try imagining that) it is argued that a decision was taken to plant explosives, so that a tower could be taken straight town, instead of faling sideways in the event of repeat. This seems a better explanation to me because the demolition is so obvious (i.e. it looks obvious to me) - I'm amazed they've got away with it. Actually, I'm not sure they will. There must have been a company in the WTC that was used as cover to get the explosives inside. I had a look at the elevator service company, as many of the core columns were accessible from the elevator shafts and nobody would notice explosives being placed in an elevator shaft. This is what I found:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
The funny stuff starts in 1994, which provides (OK, inconclusive) support for my argument.

Yes, would say the poor air defense responsive is suggestive (but not proof) of government complicity, but that does not necessarily imply foreknowledge. In fact, the worsening quality of the response implies the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC