I'm puzzled why the Gov't (and associated advocates) would bother to continue promoting the absurd idea that WTC 7 collapsed as the result of several fires in corners of the building. There's never been an allegation that any of Wacky Caveman Osama's coke snortin' "radical" Islamic jeehaws had anything to do with bringing it down, so I don't understand why they won't just say: "A decision was made to deliberately bring down WTC 7 with explosives...to eliminate any possibility of further loss of life, blah blah blah."
What's the purpose of adamantly clinging to an indefensible theory that is becoming little more than a big joke?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
