You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: Who's struggling? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Who's struggling?
Me, nope I did my observation. I know what I see it's you asking me to go out on a limb. Damn try a new tune.

As for belief I don't have that limitation because I presented something that you can observe. Since observations happen one at a time it is best to limit such observations to the scope at which they can be best judged/understood.

I have a 19 month old and a 4 year old; I don't find you frustrating or your inability to rationalize facts for yourself self frustrating. I find it very robotic of you and your behavior attempting to get me explain something only people who have a problem with my views want me to explain. You obviously know how to read, I would suggest you do some research if you need answers. If you want to point out a problem with the scope of logic that I presented please do so, but don't distract the scope so you don't have to deal with the simple facts presented.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -19 crazy stripper lovin fanatics couldn't imagine they would do this libertypirate  Dec-10-05 11:34 AM   #0 
  - All the evidence had to be destroyed  musette_sf   Dec-10-05 12:00 PM   #1 
  - ***Excellent Post. WTFU, Expletives Appropriate. How Can We Accept Lies  Christophera   Dec-10-05 12:21 PM   #2 
  - Your thermodynamic model is flawed.  AZCat   Dec-10-05 12:23 PM   #3 
  - Heat is a form of energy am I right or am I wrong? /nt  libertypirate   Dec-10-05 12:27 PM   #4 
  - You are correct.  AZCat   Dec-10-05 12:32 PM   #5 
     - Beyond the context of this pile of rubble, you are absolutely correct /nt  libertypirate   Dec-10-05 06:22 PM   #8 
        - It is always correct. n/t  AZCat   Dec-10-05 09:43 PM   #9 
  - heat capacity =/= energy  rman   Dec-10-05 01:19 PM   #6 
  - The heat capacity is the ratio...  AZCat   Dec-10-05 09:50 PM   #10 
     - Sorry now you have reached bullshit land.... Jet Fuel speculation  libertypirate   Dec-11-05 11:26 AM   #11 
     - You believe people think jet fuel was still causing the fire  LARED   Dec-11-05 11:47 AM   #12 
     - Ah yes, the classic...  AZCat   Dec-11-05 09:29 PM   #14 
        - The question that implies guilt.  libertypirate   Dec-11-05 11:20 PM   #16 
           - Correcting thermodynamic misunderstandings...  AZCat   Dec-12-05 07:13 AM   #18 
              - Forcing the subject to exists in a perfect model doesn't make it  libertypirate   Dec-12-05 10:53 AM   #21 
                 - We are all in this together.  AZCat   Dec-13-05 06:29 AM   #30 
     - Are you saying burning jet fuel could have reached  rman   Dec-11-05 01:41 PM   #13 
  - Pedantically correct, but doesn't change the point being made  AlienSpaceBat   Dec-10-05 02:36 PM   #7 
  - I think we can rule out fuel from the plane.  Old and In the Way   Dec-11-05 10:48 PM   #15 
  - Did you see two buildings turn to dust before they hit the ground?  libertypirate   Dec-11-05 11:24 PM   #17 
     - Perhaps, what you saw was NOT  LARED   Dec-12-05 07:47 AM   #19 
        - I am still trying to figure out how a structure designed  libertypirate   Dec-12-05 10:02 AM   #20 
           - It only proves that Allah is indeed great.  petgoat   Dec-12-05 02:36 PM   #22 
           - Well , learn the difference between static and dynamic loads..  hack89   Dec-12-05 05:34 PM   #23 
              - Since the building had to fall apart before it could fall to the ground  libertypirate   Dec-12-05 09:21 PM   #26 
                 - It's not that hard..  hack89   Dec-13-05 06:02 AM   #28 
                    - Hold on there  dailykoff   Dec-13-05 04:12 PM   #34 
                       - Well,  hack89   Dec-14-05 07:10 AM   #38 
                          - MIT scientist  dailykoff   Dec-14-05 09:04 AM   #40 
                             - only one column need sag..  hack89   Dec-14-05 12:55 PM   #44 
                                - I'm afraid  dailykoff   Dec-14-05 02:15 PM   #46 
  - OK - so you tell us..  hack89   Dec-12-05 05:39 PM   #24 
  - Although I understand the question I hope you realize that it is least  libertypirate   Dec-12-05 09:11 PM   #25 
     - Proving me wrong does not prove you right..  hack89   Dec-13-05 06:06 AM   #29 
        - You obviously don't get it... I don't have to prove anything the evidence  libertypirate   Dec-13-05 09:50 AM   #31 
           - Mind if I ask a question?  LARED   Dec-13-05 10:59 AM   #32 
           - You don't have to imply jack shit about an observation, but you do about  libertypirate   Dec-13-05 11:00 PM   #35 
              - Please explain why you think  LARED   Dec-14-05 07:12 AM   #39 
                 - Conservation of Energy - a law not psuedo science  libertypirate   Dec-14-05 09:55 AM   #42 
                    - Is it safe to assume the term  LARED   Dec-14-05 11:07 AM   #43 
                       - There is no fuel on earth in quantities provided in that rubble  libertypirate   Dec-14-05 09:00 PM   #49 
                          - Burning for six weeks is  LARED   Dec-14-05 09:06 PM   #50 
                             - What exactly in those buildings could combust under neither rich nor lean  libertypirate   Dec-14-05 11:08 PM   #51 
                                - self deleted  hack89   Dec-17-05 10:23 PM   #54 
           - You make no sense..  hack89   Dec-13-05 03:41 PM   #33 
              - Are you color blind? Seems like a couple you fellas or ladies are  libertypirate   Dec-13-05 11:10 PM   #36 
                 - You're struggling a little here, aren't you?  hack89   Dec-14-05 06:57 AM   #37 
                    - Who's struggling?  libertypirate   Dec-14-05 09:39 AM   #41 
                       - Well, of course people who agree with you..  hack89   Dec-14-05 12:59 PM   #45 
                          - This is so basic, Do you not know what cause effect is?  libertypirate   Dec-14-05 08:55 PM   #48 
                             - I would still like to see your calculations...  AZCat   Dec-15-05 06:14 AM   #52 
  - Interesting take  unpossibles   Dec-13-05 01:04 AM   #27 
  - WTCs blown  savemefromdumbya   Dec-14-05 08:20 PM   #47 
  - Erm...perhaps it was some sort of explosive?  spangler   Dec-17-05 07:21 PM   #53 
     - You forgot a little coincidence, I know there is just so many  libertypirate   Dec-17-05 11:00 PM   #55 
        - ahh that's because....  spangler   Dec-18-05 10:01 AM   #56 
        - I am confused...  hack89   Dec-18-05 01:54 PM   #57 
           - Think trees  LARED   Dec-18-05 03:22 PM   #58 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC