You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: It's over. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
seatnineb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. It's over.
Forget it Merc.

On this issue you ,and far more importantly ,the story that you stick up for are lost.

And here is why.

At 9:57 the passenger assault began.Several passengers had terminated phone calls with loved ones in order to join the revolt.One of the callers ended her message as follows.."Everyone is running to First Class.I've got to go .Bye."
9/11 Commission Report.
Page 13.


The passenger who said this was one Sandy Bradshaw..A Flight attendant aboard Flight 93.

And this is what the 9/11 commission report purposefully failed to tell us about the timing of this call......


Bradshaw said he took his wife's call about 9:30 a.m. at their home in northwest Greensboro.

Bradshaw thinks they talked for five or 10 minutes.

Phil Bradshaw heard the phone drop. "We're all running to first class," were her last words. "I've got to go. Bye."


http://www.warroom.com/nyterrorism/flightattendant.htm

This puts the Counter-attack at roughly 9:35 to 9:40am.....Not at 9:57am.

Oh the lies,the lies......



















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Jeremy Glick and the collapsing south tower woody b  Jan-11-04 03:56 PM   #0 
  - bump  woody b   Sep-24-04 01:15 PM   #1 
  - Well spotted!  seatnineb   Sep-24-04 02:05 PM   #2 
  - Great...  woody b   Sep-24-04 04:31 PM   #6 
     - I'm sure he would be...  MercutioATC   Sep-24-04 05:53 PM   #7 
        - Hm  John Doe II   Sep-25-04 06:12 AM   #9 
           - I don't see how it's an issue.  MercutioATC   Sep-25-04 12:59 PM   #11 
              - Merc...you have been betrayed by the very story you believe in.  seatnineb   Sep-25-04 02:19 PM   #12 
                 - No I haven't...here's why:  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 03:16 AM   #14 
                    - No, not possible  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 03:43 AM   #16 
                       - You DO realize you're talking about a "grey area" of TWO minutes  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 04:15 AM   #17 
                       - The difference  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 04:22 AM   #18 
                          - So what?  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 04:26 AM   #19 
                             - Please  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 04:29 AM   #20 
                             - Wrong.  seatnineb   Sep-26-04 05:44 AM   #21 
                             - I really wish you'd skip the melodrama, seatnineb...  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 10:41 PM   #22 
                                - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-27-04 02:39 AM   #26 
                                - It's over.  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 08:36 AM   #30 
                                   - It salways the same isn't it?  RH   Sep-27-04 10:42 AM   #33 
                                   - Anomaly.  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 02:58 PM   #40 
                                      - Thanks again  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 03:02 PM   #41 
                                         - No.... I should thank you.  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 03:19 PM   #44 
                                         - ! Yes, I'm feeling a bit tired !  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 03:30 PM   #45 
                                         - Yeah!  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 03:42 PM   #46 
                                         - I repeat myself!  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 03:53 PM   #48 
                                   - Good find  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 12:52 PM   #35 
                                   - Anomaly.  RH   Sep-27-04 04:03 PM   #50 
                                      - Anomaly according to the F.B.I  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 04:56 PM   #65 
                             - You just ignore the facts that don't add up. So allow me to help.  stickdog   Sep-27-04 02:27 AM   #25 
                                - What doesn't add up?  RH   Sep-27-04 04:35 PM   #60 
                                   - Possible as described? No.  stickdog   Sep-27-04 05:02 PM   #66 
                                      - It is not obvious to me  RH   Sep-27-04 07:48 PM   #69 
                                         - YOU'D RATHER NOT RESORT TO HYPERBOLIC SPECULATION?  stickdog   Sep-27-04 10:35 PM   #70 
                                         - Perhaps you dont know what the word means,  RH   Sep-28-04 05:53 AM   #72 
                                            - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-28-04 01:20 PM   #87 
                                         - What's the use?  John Doe II   Sep-28-04 02:35 AM   #71 
                                         - No, I do not use my brain to invent evidence.  RH   Sep-28-04 05:59 AM   #73 
                                            - Nothing can dissuade the zealot who has already convinced himself  stickdog   Sep-28-04 01:24 PM   #88 
                                         - Hm  k-robjoe   Sep-28-04 11:14 AM   #81 
                                            - Denial  RH   Sep-28-04 12:11 PM   #83 
                                            - No RH  k-robjoe   Sep-28-04 12:46 PM   #84 
                                            - New theory?  John Doe II   Sep-28-04 12:58 PM   #86 
                                            - Your technique of trying to confuse the issue is tiresome.  stickdog   Sep-28-04 01:25 PM   #89 
                                            - The issue is clear enough.  RH   Sep-28-04 04:27 PM   #90 
                                            - So here is your explanation?!  John Doe II   Sep-28-04 04:44 PM   #91 
                                            - I have a hunch that  RH   Sep-28-04 06:28 PM   #92 
                                            - To chicken out  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 02:44 AM   #94 
                                            - How do you know  RH   Sep-29-04 03:44 AM   #96 
                                            - Please!  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 03:53 AM   #97 
                                            - It is perfectly possible not to mention.  RH   Sep-29-04 05:34 AM   #98 
                                            - Very usual  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 05:55 AM   #102 
                                            - "tonnes of documents"?  RH   Sep-29-04 07:41 AM   #104 
                                            - Who has to show a link?  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 09:06 AM   #109 
                                            - How would a link help?  RH   Sep-29-04 09:42 AM   #110 
                                            - NOBODY NOBODY NOBODY mentions this  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 09:47 AM   #111 
                                            - Absence of evidence is not  RH   Sep-29-04 10:05 AM   #112 
                                            - Wake me up  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 10:09 AM   #113 
                                            - !!  John Doe II   Sep-28-04 12:56 PM   #85 
                       - Correct me if I'm mistaken...  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 10:45 PM   #23 
                          - No  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 02:25 AM   #24 
                          - I can't explain the few minutes of difference. Perhaps Lyz Glick  MercutioATC   Sep-28-04 06:13 AM   #76 
                          - Lyz Glick  John Doe II   Sep-28-04 06:30 AM   #78 
                          - I'd disagree with your characterization.  MercutioATC   Sep-28-04 09:15 PM   #93 
                             - MercutioATC, it's not about that  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 02:46 AM   #95 
                             - based on Glick's phone call?  RH   Sep-29-04 05:51 AM   #101 
                                - PLEASE  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 05:58 AM   #103 
                                   - We should take that as a 'no', then,should we?.  RH   Sep-29-04 07:47 AM   #105 
                                      - Can you please for a change really read my post?  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 07:55 AM   #106 
                                      - I was kind enough to respond.  RH   Sep-29-04 08:43 AM   #107 
                                      - Super  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 09:01 AM   #108 
                             - So we have  k-robjoe   Sep-29-04 05:46 AM   #99 
                                - Please stay with me, k-robjoe!!  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 05:48 AM   #100 
                          - The CT was that  RH   Sep-28-04 09:00 AM   #79 
                          - Good work on this...  tngledwebb   Sep-28-04 11:36 AM   #82 
                          - No cell phone company records have ever been produced or even cited.  stickdog   Sep-27-04 02:46 AM   #27 
                          - Just thinking  k-robjoe   Sep-27-04 08:30 AM   #28 
                             - Indeed  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 08:34 AM   #29 
                             - I'd guess  RH   Sep-27-04 10:35 AM   #32 
                                - Reliable  k-robjoe   Sep-27-04 10:48 AM   #34 
                                - Where does your "five minutes" come from?  RH   Sep-27-04 01:08 PM   #36 
                                   - It has all been said already!  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 01:25 PM   #37 
                                   - Point 16 is nothing but hearsay.  RH   Sep-27-04 02:53 PM   #38 
                                      - Hearsay  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 02:57 PM   #39 
                                         - It is hearsay because  RH   Sep-27-04 04:07 PM   #52 
                                         - Great  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 04:14 PM   #53 
                                         - Sad.  RH   Sep-27-04 04:26 PM   #58 
                                         - Talking about politness  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 04:35 PM   #61 
                                         - My point is that  RH   Sep-27-04 04:39 PM   #63 
                                         - Whatever you've said  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 04:46 PM   #64 
                                   - Very simple Question.  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 03:10 PM   #42 
                                   - I am not a witness.  RH   Sep-27-04 03:53 PM   #49 
                                      - No intention of interrogation  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 04:06 PM   #51 
                                      - If you're saying that a version is deliberately false  RH   Sep-27-04 04:21 PM   #55 
                                      - Did Lyz Glick lie?  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 04:31 PM   #59 
                                      - I see no proof that Glick lied  RH   Sep-28-04 06:02 AM   #74 
                                      - ....  John Doe II   Sep-28-04 06:14 AM   #77 
                                      - rh  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 04:24 PM   #56 
                                      - In the words of many famous bluesmen, can I get a witness? (nt)  stickdog   Sep-27-04 04:25 PM   #57 
                                         - Not around here.  RH   Sep-27-04 04:36 PM   #62 
                                         - Not in the case of Flight 93.  stickdog   Sep-27-04 05:03 PM   #67 
                                         - Nice one!  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 05:34 PM   #68 
                                         - That's another issue.  RH   Sep-28-04 06:05 AM   #75 
                                   - Very simple Question.  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 03:10 PM   #43 
                                   - Where does my 5 minutes come from?  k-robjoe   Sep-27-04 03:50 PM   #47 
                                - I think it has to do with the timing of the "unarmed transport plane"  stickdog   Sep-27-04 04:16 PM   #54 
                             - Attas rolling of the plane?  RH   Sep-27-04 10:33 AM   #31 
  - Great find!  John Doe II   Sep-24-04 03:17 PM   #3 
  - Source  John Doe II   Sep-24-04 03:30 PM   #4 
     - Further confirmation...  woody b   Sep-24-04 04:26 PM   #5 
        - This timeline is over!  seatnineb   Sep-25-04 10:16 AM   #10 
  - This is highly highly important!!  John Doe II   Sep-25-04 01:48 AM   #8 
     - Okay...so what ???  sffreeways   Sep-25-04 10:49 PM   #13 
        - Why this is important  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 03:35 AM   #15 
           - It can be correct  RH   Sep-28-04 09:16 AM   #80 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC