You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #265: I agree. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #254
265. I agree.
"I think it's sad that this has become the subject of such ridicule."

At least you tried to test the collapse hypothesis.
I'm kind of surprised that the skeptics wouldn't encourage and dialogue on how to make it a better model for testing the idea, rather than insulting you. Wouldn't this be precisely the way for all of us to validate either side of the debate?

Perhaps your crude idea has provided someone with inspiration to develop a more exact model that would further the discussion and our understanding of the WTC collapse event.

Anyway, I appreciate your attempt to test the hypothesis....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC