You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #159: Your premise that the bolts failed is of the Zipper-Pancake epoch [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #157
159. Your premise that the bolts failed is of the Zipper-Pancake epoch
in WTC analysis. NIST has repudiated the "weak truss clips" theory. Now the dogma is
that your bolts are so freaking strong that saggy floors pulled the perimeter columns
inward and buckled them. AFAIK no one has stepped forward to defend the MIT/NOVA/Scientific
American/Nat'l Geographic theories from NIST.

If the bolts are so weak, how did collapsing floors tear down the 47 15" X 36" core columns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC