janedoe
(540 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-14-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #98 |
| 99. Here's a hot campfire :-) |
| -Thermal image taken shortly after the plane crash in WTC |
Ice4Clark |
Aug-07-05 11:18 PM |
#0 |
-
Surely someone would have looked for a part number |
philb |
Aug-07-05 11:53 PM |
#1 |
-
The fires weren't that hot. Particularly since most of the fuel burned up |
spooked911 |
Aug-08-05 02:22 PM |
#2 |
 -
According to the first color image, |
janedoe |
Aug-08-05 03:11 PM |
#3 |
  -
How far away from the building was the picture taken? |
hack89 |
Aug-08-05 03:46 PM |
#5 |
   -
Excellent question |
LARED |
Aug-08-05 08:15 PM |
#7 |
  -
You really believe that? |
vincent_vega_lives |
Aug-12-05 07:41 AM |
#56 |
 -
Campfires burn at 400 to 600 degrees C. |
petgoat |
Aug-14-05 03:53 PM |
#98 |
 -
Here's a hot campfire :-) |
janedoe |
Aug-14-05 04:59 PM |
#99 |
 -
It's a Raging Inferno, LOL! n/t |
petgoat |
Aug-14-05 06:09 PM |
#100 |
 -
Melting Airplane Engines |
janedoe |
Aug-14-05 06:34 PM |
#102 |
 -
It depends on what nationality starts the fire, of course... |
mikelewis |
Aug-17-05 07:56 AM |
#131 |
 -
It's not what nationality starts the fire, silly. |
janedoe |
Aug-17-05 10:33 AM |
#132 |
 -
Nonsense |
hack89 |
Aug-08-05 03:40 PM |
#4 |
-
You don't know much about office buidlings, do you? |
pox americana |
Aug-08-05 07:53 PM |
#6 |
 -
You don't know much about sprinkler systems do you |
LARED |
Aug-08-05 08:19 PM |
#8 |
  -
I know enough to see that FEMA is lying, as usual. |
pox americana |
Aug-08-05 09:53 PM |
#11 |
   -
You really should do some research before responding |
LARED |
Aug-09-05 07:11 AM |
#17 |
  -
Speaking of critical thinking, the reports you keep citing are unreliable, |
pox americana |
Aug-09-05 07:48 AM |
#18 |
  -
The bottom line is that the sprinkler systems were not |
LARED |
Aug-09-05 08:08 AM |
#19 |
  -
Isn't it ironic |
janedoe |
Aug-09-05 08:14 AM |
#20 |
  -
Ironic wasn't the word I had in mind |
LARED |
Aug-09-05 08:31 AM |
#21 |
  -
Until you show me the system specifications |
pox americana |
Aug-09-05 11:49 AM |
#22 |
  -
Sorry, I'm not doing your homework for you |
LARED |
Aug-09-05 02:30 PM |
#24 |
  -
Standards are not specifications. |
pox americana |
Aug-09-05 07:40 PM |
#27 |
  -
Well, that true, but is there a point in telling us this? |
LARED |
Aug-09-05 07:58 PM |
#28 |
   -
You're telling me you don't know the difference |
pox americana |
Aug-09-05 08:15 PM |
#29 |
  -
Wow, did you make all that up yourself |
LARED |
Aug-09-05 08:21 PM |
#30 |
  -
I don't make stuff up, and I had lots of help. |
pox americana |
Aug-09-05 11:07 PM |
#35 |
  -
The specs aren't what you want either |
AZCat |
Aug-10-05 03:44 PM |
#37 |
  -
Yes, they are. |
pox americana |
Aug-10-05 10:08 PM |
#41 |
  -
Actually, I write specs all the time. |
AZCat |
Aug-10-05 10:18 PM |
#43 |
  -
Ahem, we're talking about NYC, not the O K Corral. |
pox americana |
Aug-10-05 10:35 PM |
#44 |
  -
Doesn't matter |
AZCat |
Aug-10-05 10:52 PM |
#45 |
  -
Sure. But we're talking about a fire sprinkler system. |
pox americana |
Aug-10-05 11:17 PM |
#46 |
  -
Actually, that's not entirely correct |
mikelewis |
Aug-11-05 06:19 PM |
#48 |
 -
very helpful! |
pox americana |
Aug-11-05 09:52 PM |
#49 |
 -
What does all out operation mean? |
LARED |
Aug-12-05 05:01 AM |
#54 |
 -
All of them... |
mikelewis |
Aug-12-05 04:57 PM |
#63 |
 -
Thanks for your response |
LARED |
Aug-12-05 06:54 PM |
#64 |
 -
That's not correct... |
mikelewis |
Aug-12-05 11:56 PM |
#67 |
 -
A question |
LARED |
Aug-13-05 07:11 AM |
#68 |
  -
Yes |
mikelewis |
Aug-13-05 08:11 AM |
#69 |
   -
I have an older copy of NFPA 13 at work |
LARED |
Aug-13-05 08:39 AM |
#70 |
    -
I'm not disputing your estimate, I just wonder where you derived this... |
mikelewis |
Aug-13-05 03:18 PM |
#78 |
   -
What do you make of this? |
Make7 |
Aug-13-05 09:26 AM |
#71 |
    -
It means mikelewis is right and the FEMA/NIST reports are horseshit. |
pox americana |
Aug-13-05 10:12 AM |
#72 |
   -
Can you elaborate on that? |
LARED |
Aug-13-05 10:15 AM |
#73 |
   -
I could, but I'm not going to belabor the obvious. |
pox americana |
Aug-13-05 10:23 AM |
#74 |
   -
Translated as |
LARED |
Aug-13-05 10:25 AM |
#75 |
   -
Clue: "multiple supply lines, pumps, tanks, and backup delivery systems." |
pox americana |
Aug-13-05 10:28 AM |
#76 |
   -
Slowly sound out the words |
LARED |
Aug-13-05 01:39 PM |
#77 |
   -
"The other side"? You mean the Bush-Cheney noise machine? |
pox americana |
Aug-14-05 02:31 AM |
#81 |
   -
No, the other side are those that read AND comprehend (n/t) |
LARED |
Aug-14-05 06:14 AM |
#82 |
   -
The nature of a fire sprinkler system... |
mikelewis |
Aug-13-05 04:25 PM |
#79 |
    -
Causes of failure... |
mikelewis |
Aug-13-05 06:19 PM |
#80 |
   -
FIREFIGHTER WILLIAM GREEN |
Make7 |
Aug-14-05 11:10 AM |
#88 |
  -
Let's see, "the water was falling down like rapids, ankle deep." |
pox americana |
Aug-14-05 12:02 PM |
#90 |
   -
I don't believe it was coached at all... |
mikelewis |
Aug-14-05 12:36 PM |
#93 |
  -
The pipes that lead to the floors are in core.... |
mikelewis |
Aug-14-05 12:18 PM |
#92 |
  -
The reason I posted the Firefighter interview.... |
Make7 |
Aug-14-05 08:50 PM |
#110 |
  -
mikelewis; please review these links and |
LARED |
Aug-14-05 07:16 AM |
#83 |
 -
Google isn't going to restore your credibility or Bush's |
pox americana |
Aug-14-05 07:44 AM |
#84 |
  -
Let me guess |
LARED |
Aug-14-05 07:50 AM |
#85 |
 -
I'm not sure what your asking... |
mikelewis |
Aug-14-05 09:40 AM |
#86 |
 -
This is where we disagree |
LARED |
Aug-14-05 01:43 PM |
#95 |
 -
2 systems, 4 supply lines, 5 pumps, and 6 5,000-gallon tanks |
pox americana |
Aug-14-05 03:46 PM |
#97 |
 -
So how does |
LARED |
Aug-14-05 08:00 PM |
#105 |
 -
Show me the specs and I'll tell you. |
pox americana |
Aug-14-05 08:26 PM |
#108 |
 -
What spec's are you looking for? (n/t) |
LARED |
Aug-14-05 09:47 PM |
#111 |
 -
The system specifications, obviously. n/t |
pox americana |
Aug-15-05 01:50 PM |
#117 |
 -
You think the system specs will tell you how |
LARED |
Aug-15-05 03:10 PM |
#118 |
 -
They'll show how much the system could deliver and for how long, yes, |
pox americana |
Aug-15-05 03:34 PM |
#119 |
 -
Thank you for making my point. I agree they are inaccurate |
LARED |
Aug-15-05 04:05 PM |
#121 |
 -
If your point is that NIST is feeding baloney to fools, you're welcome. |
pox americana |
Aug-15-05 04:11 PM |
#122 |
 -
Another well reasoned reply, (n/t) |
LARED |
Aug-15-05 05:02 PM |
#123 |
 -
LARED, you obviously don't know about the 15M gallon water tank at the WTC |
MercutioATC |
Aug-15-05 05:09 PM |
#126 |
 -
NFPA standards online. |
Make7 |
Aug-14-05 10:52 AM |
#87 |
 -
Okay... if you go to Chapter 11 Section 2.... |
mikelewis |
Aug-14-05 11:37 AM |
#89 |
 -
Past and present standards. |
Make7 |
Aug-14-05 12:08 PM |
#91 |
 -
They have to meet the current standards of when the sprinkler system... |
mikelewis |
Aug-14-05 12:45 PM |
#94 |
 -
Thanks. ( n/t ) |
Make7 |
Aug-14-05 08:41 PM |
#109 |
 -
Mike, I really appreciate you bringing your expertise to this forum |
petgoat |
Aug-15-05 05:05 PM |
#124 |
 -
A small electric short circuit started a blaze |
hack89 |
Aug-08-05 10:17 PM |
#13 |
  -
The Windsor building was concrete framed, burned 24 hrs, did not collapse, |
pox americana |
Aug-08-05 10:47 PM |
#14 |
 -
But it was packed with flammable materials... |
hack89 |
Aug-09-05 02:09 PM |
#23 |
 -
It was undergoing renovation |
pox americana |
Aug-09-05 07:38 PM |
#26 |
 -
There was about 60 tons per floor of flammable material in the WTC... |
hack89 |
Aug-09-05 08:45 PM |
#32 |
 -
That's why they had automatic sprinklers. |
pox americana |
Aug-09-05 11:05 PM |
#34 |
  -
And how did the sprinklers survive the impact? |
hack89 |
Aug-10-05 07:40 PM |
#39 |
 -
Just like the rest of the structure did. |
pox americana |
Aug-10-05 10:12 PM |
#42 |
 -
Your contention is not believable... |
hack89 |
Aug-11-05 03:44 PM |
#47 |
 -
That doesn't make it any less true. |
pox americana |
Aug-11-05 09:57 PM |
#50 |
 -
Interesting way to concede the point but thanks. n/t |
hack89 |
Aug-11-05 10:06 PM |
#51 |
 -
May I suggest the purchase of an English dictionary. n/t |
pox americana |
Aug-11-05 10:12 PM |
#52 |
 -
When you respond to a reasoned statement.. |
hack89 |
Aug-11-05 10:18 PM |
#53 |
 -
Sure. |
stickdog |
Aug-12-05 08:39 AM |
#59 |
 -
Read this .. do the math.. |
hack89 |
Aug-12-05 11:02 AM |
#62 |
 -
Look at this, then get a clue. |
stickdog |
Aug-12-05 08:05 PM |
#66 |
 -
Actually, since the building was only 30% occupied at best... |
mikelewis |
Aug-14-05 07:34 PM |
#103 |
 -
30% occupied? |
petgoat |
Aug-14-05 07:38 PM |
#104 |
 -
The WTC was only 30% occupied? At best? |
LARED |
Aug-14-05 08:03 PM |
#106 |
 -
Before I show you mine, you show me yours... |
mikelewis |
Aug-14-05 11:34 PM |
#112 |
 -
And I just discovered that I was wrong, it wasn't 30%.. can you guess... |
mikelewis |
Aug-14-05 11:41 PM |
#113 |
 -
I thought in your previous post you meant tenant occupancy. |
Make7 |
Aug-14-05 11:45 PM |
#114 |
 -
How many tenants were there? |
mikelewis |
Aug-15-05 12:22 AM |
#115 |
 -
Two hundred eighty. |
Make7 |
Aug-15-05 03:17 AM |
#116 |
 -
How many people worked in the towers? You're best guess. |
mikelewis |
Aug-17-05 02:00 AM |
#128 |
 -
Thirty Seven Thousand Six Hundred Twenty Nine. |
Make7 |
Aug-17-05 02:13 AM |
#129 |
 -
And what are you basing this guess on? |
mikelewis |
Aug-17-05 07:52 AM |
#130 |
 -
The percentage of total available square footage of ... |
Make7 |
Aug-18-05 06:29 AM |
#134 |
 -
test |
spooked911 |
Aug-17-05 11:23 AM |
#133 |
 -
WTC |
sabbat hunter |
Aug-15-05 04:00 PM |
#120 |
-
previous wtc fires |
slaveplanet |
Aug-08-05 09:28 PM |
#9 |
 -
You Got to be Kidding... |
carlvs |
Aug-08-05 09:54 PM |
#12 |
 -
I don't think they are hiding it... |
mikelewis |
Aug-14-05 06:34 PM |
#101 |
-
"none of them caught fire"/"catastrophic fires" |
petgoat |
Aug-08-05 11:07 PM |
#15 |
 -
Supposedly... |
Make7 |
Aug-09-05 12:54 AM |
#16 |
-
Yes, that guy is sampling steel. |
petgoat |
Aug-09-05 04:36 PM |
#25 |
-
The sulfur came from gypsum in the wall board. |
hack89 |
Aug-09-05 08:39 PM |
#31 |
 -
The Expert Metallurgists Don't Know Where the Sulfur Came From. |
petgoat |
Aug-10-05 01:29 AM |
#36 |
-
It wasn't explosives or detonators |
hack89 |
Aug-10-05 07:05 PM |
#38 |
-
I HATE disinformation. |
stickdog |
Aug-12-05 07:43 PM |
#65 |
-
I suppose... |
Make7 |
Aug-10-05 07:48 PM |
#40 |
-
You are speculating. Where is a shred of EVIDENCE that ANY |
stickdog |
Aug-12-05 08:35 AM |
#57 |
-
There was a part which landed on a rooftop |
undeterred |
Aug-08-05 09:30 PM |
#10 |
-
Mechanical Eng. debunks official story of WTC |
philb |
Aug-09-05 11:01 PM |
#33 |
-
It's only regurgitated CT sophistry (n/t) |
LARED |
Aug-12-05 07:21 AM |
#55 |
-
That's telling 'em. |
stickdog |
Aug-12-05 08:36 AM |
#58 |
-
What kind of reply would you expect? |
LARED |
Aug-12-05 08:45 AM |
#60 |
-
That only works when your views fit in with their theories. ( n/t ) |
Make7 |
Aug-12-05 08:49 AM |
#61 |
-
LARED, ASME, ME. There you go, am I now more believable |
petgoat |
Aug-14-05 01:58 PM |
#96 |
-
Is petgoat your real name? |
LARED |
Aug-14-05 08:08 PM |
#107 |
-
I'm not claiming "petgoat, ASME, ME" gives me credibility n/t |
petgoat |
Aug-15-05 05:08 PM |
#125 |
-
Is it safe to assume you believe that because |
LARED |
Aug-15-05 08:00 PM |
#127 |