You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #68: An analysis that a detailed investigation would undertake... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
ROH Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. An analysis that a detailed investigation would undertake...
You wrote:
"Of special interest would be the prior performance within NORAD's Northeastern Air Defense Sector ("NEADS"), which is headquartered at Rome, New York. Such a cumulative analysis--with special attention to cases when passenger planes deviated from course in the air-traffic control zones within which the 9/11 attacks occurred--would provide indispensable context for serious research into the subject of air defense response on September 11. This data is currently unavailable to the public, and there is no indication such an analysis was undertaken by the Kean Commission."

Thank you - very important point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Pentagon Hole Explanation LARED  May-07-05 07:04 AM   #0 
  - National Geographic changing the name of the Persian Gulf  seemslikeadream   May-07-05 09:28 AM   #1 
  - National Geographic responds like a credible organization  LARED   May-07-05 10:28 AM   #2 
     - Why wasn't it prevented by standard operating procedures?  ROH   May-07-05 02:18 PM   #3 
        - SOP's????  LARED   May-07-05 04:24 PM   #6 
        - The comments are from David Ray Griffin  ROH   May-07-05 06:19 PM   #9 
           - Would it be too much to ask....  Make7   May-07-05 09:48 PM   #13 
              - The second link presents the author's comments  ROH   May-07-05 10:43 PM   #17 
                 - How's this for a brief explanation:  Make7   May-07-05 11:38 PM   #22 
                    - "... about 20 minutes after ground controllers lost contact."  ROH   May-08-05 08:27 AM   #27 
                    - Times  Make7   May-08-05 03:45 PM   #33 
                       - Let's align the events in the reports...  ROH   May-08-05 10:03 PM   #52 
                          - I don't get it.  Make7   May-09-05 02:26 AM   #56 
                             - "... about 20 minutes after ground controllers lost contact."  ROH   May-09-05 11:32 AM   #59 
                                - When an intercept might not really be an intercept.  Make7   May-09-05 12:34 PM   #60 
                                   - Whatever we may decide regarding these several somewhat differing reports,  ROH   May-09-05 05:05 PM   #62 
                                      - You brought up the issue of standard operating procedures.  Make7   May-10-05 04:42 AM   #63 
                                         - Let's look at your own comments on NORAD notification...  ROH   May-10-05 09:15 AM   #64 
                                            - just save me the effort and tell me  Make7   May-11-05 03:03 AM   #70 
                                               - As I have already mentioned to you (see above messages)...  ROH   May-11-05 08:41 AM   #71 
                                               - Why wasn't it prevented by standard operating procedures?  Make7   May-15-05 08:37 PM   #74 
                                               - Thank you for your investigations...  ROH   May-15-05 09:44 PM   #76 
                    - The NTSB report makes itself dubious...  JackRiddler   May-10-05 03:20 PM   #65 
                       - An analysis that a detailed investigation would undertake...  ROH   May-10-05 04:45 PM   #68 
        - How do you think the Pentagon is defended from air attack? (NT)  hack89   May-07-05 04:56 PM   #7 
           - See above message  ROH   May-07-05 09:39 PM   #12 
           - Your example show a test pilot on a routine training flight..  hack89   May-08-05 10:32 AM   #28 
              - Specific comments from Griffin on the Pentagon defenses are as follows...  ROH   May-08-05 11:07 AM   #30 
                 - Griffin is wrong.  hack89   May-08-05 12:38 PM   #32 
                    - Since the Pentagon is not protected,  DulceDecorum   May-08-05 08:20 PM   #47 
                    - I did not say that the Pentagon was not protected....  hack89   May-08-05 09:49 PM   #51 
                    - Hmmm  TomClash   May-15-05 09:18 PM   #75 
                       - Think Patriot PAC-3 Think real new (NT)  hack89   May-21-05 02:22 PM   #82 
           - If the Pentagon cannot frickin defend ITSELF  DulceDecorum   May-08-05 08:32 PM   #48 
           - Hm, apparently it's not...  JackRiddler   May-10-05 03:32 PM   #66 
              - The Pentagon is within spitting distance of a major airport..  hack89   May-22-05 03:50 PM   #84 
  - I didn't realize  Project_Willow   May-07-05 03:04 PM   #4 
  - .... about those folding wings,  DulceDecorum   May-08-05 07:55 PM   #44 
  - :chuckle:  boloboffin   May-07-05 03:11 PM   #5 
  - Pressure waves  LARED   May-07-05 05:21 PM   #8 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-08-05 06:38 PM   #39 
  - Oh my! The National Geographic provided a bogus field trip??  DulceDecorum   May-08-05 09:12 PM   #50 
     - Yes, DD, to keep their PBS funding.  boloboffin   May-09-05 06:58 AM   #57 
        - Most certainly.  DulceDecorum   May-09-05 09:20 AM   #58 
  - That's really interesting, thanks. But there are a few problems.  spooked911   May-07-05 08:56 PM   #10 
  - Something else?  LARED   May-07-05 09:08 PM   #11 
  - inferno location  demodewd   May-07-05 10:06 PM   #14 
  - Because  LARED   May-07-05 10:09 PM   #15 
     - true but..  demodewd   May-07-05 10:33 PM   #16 
        - I must ask  LARED   May-08-05 07:02 AM   #26 
           - incineration  demodewd   May-08-05 03:55 PM   #34 
  - self delete  meppie-meppie not   May-11-05 02:24 PM   #72 
  - no it didn't and "no serious person could hold that position". n't  meppie-meppie not   May-11-05 02:28 PM   #73 
  - "there are a few problems"  Make7   May-07-05 10:46 PM   #18 
     - re: debris  demodewd   May-07-05 10:50 PM   #19 
     - exactly!  spooked911   May-07-05 10:54 PM   #20 
     - Based on the size of the hole...  Make7   May-08-05 12:02 AM   #23 
        - it should have penetrated well into the building but didn't  demodewd   May-08-05 02:19 AM   #25 
           - fuel fires  Make7   May-08-05 04:04 PM   #35 
              - IMHO  demodewd   May-08-05 05:27 PM   #37 
                 - Shaped charges make little holes.  hack89   May-08-05 05:59 PM   #38 
                 - I'm not quite understanding your theory.  Make7   May-09-05 01:20 AM   #53 
                    - Did you see the discussion of the color of the fire? too red for gas fire?  philb   May-21-05 08:20 AM   #78 
                       - philb  demodewd   May-21-05 01:03 PM   #81 
     - We agree on the missing frames-- why were they deleted?  spooked911   May-07-05 11:06 PM   #21 
        - Was wasn't the video released?  Make7   May-08-05 12:25 AM   #24 
        - Reply  spooked911   May-08-05 10:58 AM   #29 
           - Why would it have to be caused by an explosion?  Make7   May-08-05 04:28 PM   #36 
        - Because pressure waves don't work that way  LARED   May-08-05 12:05 PM   #31 
           - From evaporation to pressure waves.  DulceDecorum   May-08-05 07:04 PM   #40 
              - DD, it's such a pleasure to 'see' you back in the forum  LARED   May-08-05 07:19 PM   #41 
                 - LARED, you know that it is the absolute truth  DulceDecorum   May-08-05 07:57 PM   #45 
                    - I really did miss you  LARED   May-08-05 08:06 PM   #46 
                       - Your job is safe.  DulceDecorum   May-08-05 08:36 PM   #49 
                          - Are you saying you are both spies? eom.  Make7   May-09-05 01:23 AM   #54 
                             - No.  DulceDecorum   May-09-05 01:39 AM   #55 
  - I like  MrSammo1   May-08-05 07:45 PM   #42 
  - Really????????  LARED   May-08-05 07:53 PM   #43 
  - Enough chit-chat.  yodermon   May-09-05 04:37 PM   #61 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-10-05 04:10 PM   #67 
  - Lamp-posts in front of the building  Borg   May-10-05 04:54 PM   #69 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-21-05 08:15 AM   #77 
     - And there's a report somewhere that says box being carried is wing of smal  philb   May-21-05 08:25 AM   #79 
        - I never heard that and I have looked into the Pentagon hit a lot  spooked911   May-21-05 12:43 PM   #80 
           - Have the Pentagon articles on Physics911 page been discussed here? link  philb   May-22-05 12:32 PM   #83 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC